Voice message, posted without a caption

Channel
Malik Mumbai Pro
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,851subscribers
+17,781 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001321794791 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel |
| Description | @Malikmumbaichatbot Cricket match analysis, stats & insights. All content is for informational & educational purposes only. No guarantees. No promotion of gambling. Play responsibly. |
| Created | 5 November 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 76,851 | -34 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 76,885 | -50 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 76,935 | +17,902 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 59,033 | -37 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 59,070 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 5 November 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.501%
- avg views ÷ 76,851 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 385
- 27 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.283%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 27
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (5 November 2019 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,387 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 2
- Videos
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 00s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2019 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Voice message, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Voice message, posted without a caption
Final Ka Baap Malik Mumbai 💪
❤1
1.5 Limit Se Kha Loo
Venkat Ramna Govinda 🙏🙏🙏🙏 Manchester Vs Trent Winner - Manchester 💖 Double Limit Match 😍 75P Trent Hai Fav Khaoo Malik Mumbai Venkat Ramna Govinda Power 💪💪💪💪
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
CPL Bhi Karenge Aaj 👍 Venkat Ramna Govinda Power 💪💪💪💪
❤1
42P Mila 💪👍😘 Venkat Ramna Govinda Power 💪💪💪💪 @Malikmumbaipro Ab Roz aayenge Free Ho Gaya
Entry Already Audio Me De diya .! 👆
Voice message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@MalikBhai · 338,760#1
@Baazigarcc · 16,893#2
@wicket_call00 · 14,439#3
@sunil_bhatia_ipl_cricket · 1,201#4
@Sunilbhatia_cricket · 24,731#5
@nitu8900 · 17,082#6
@Asg_jackpot_king · 14,143#7
@sanjay_goyal_tips · 2,800#8
@ORIGlNAL_12TH_MAN · 4,917#9
@Surya_Bhai_Bombay · 22,463#10
@Sanjay_Goyal_Cricket · 8,676#11
@AJAY_BHAI · 11,169#12
@SAKSHIPREDICTIONOFFICIAL · 10,089 (as read 19 August 2026)#13
@Ayush_Bazigarrr · 10,587#14
@TOSS_MATCH_PAID_REEPORT · 913#15
@bettytips · 38,693#16
@sarthakpredictioncricket · 1,121#17
@goldminechannel · 109,088#18
@Puneet_jackpot_special · 762#19
@Sunil_bhatia_sunil_bhatiya · 103,991#20
@Durban_Dada_Vip6 · 2,559#21
@MUMBAITOSSLINE · 43,232#22
@PUNTER_KI_PANCHAYAT_CRICKET_IPL · 8,930#23
@YcvXMsxjNQg4ZGY1VSGandhi · 11,876#24
@Sunil_bhatia_811 · 11,203#25
@ALL_MATCH_FIX_PREDICTION_CRIKET · 23,751#26
@INDIAN_PREMIER_LEAGUE_TIPPER · 5,920#27
@BadshahCricketkings · 106,691#28
@NeharikaShinde4938 · 18,465#29
@malik_mumbai_sirs · 6,776 (as read 19 August 2026)#30
@VSRPOWERR · 121,798#31
@crictossline21 · 44,025#32
@VSGTHhundredLPLTOSSmatch · 1,606#33
@baazigarayush_baazigar · 839#34
@TigerLine786 · 10,076#35
@Mahendra_Singh_Dhoni_MS_Dhoni · 831#36
@doncricke · 1,167#37
@matchtraders1 · 2,001#38
@Bcci_Fixer_Toss · 543#39
@ARYANTHEBRANDTOSS · 60,347#40
@Market_Toss_Load_Ranga_Rao · 70,489#41
@sixsensecricketprediction · 1,572#42
@Fantasykingpawan · 1,543#43
@BahubaliLinee · 17,193#44
@CRICKETMARKETLOAD24 · 4,862#45
@OCTOPUSFIXERDADA · 7,372#46
@indianline111 · 4,939#47
@cricketbettingtips6979 · 21,635#48
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · 21,576#49
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,064,002#50
@Rock_star_raj_bhai_3 · 419#51
@ARYAN_THE_BRAND_MATCHH · 59,236#52
@kingamaker91 · 15,349#53
@ALaurencefoxbrand397paisakamao · 48,444#54
@vsgline2 · 140,126#55
@cricketlinefree · 4,272#56
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MalikBhai · 338,760
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 19 August 2026
@Sunil_bhatia_sunil_bhatiya · 103,991
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 19 August 2026
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro18 · 75,256
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 August 2026
@BadshahCricketkings · 106,691
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Malik Mumbai Pro” (@Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel), 76,851 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.