Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for B A H U B A L I

Channel

B A H U B A L I

@BahubaliLinee

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,568subscribers

-379 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001105356205
TypeChannel
Username@BahubaliLinee
DescriptionLive non live all matches line free B A H U B A L I LINK 👇👇 https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEHiZa3UIjfbKtIAYA https://t.me/+9VaIgqd_DMg2ZDM1 PAID PROMOTION CONTACT = @vkman
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 31 December 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BahubaliLinee

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 32 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/58536776 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC@BahubaliLinee/6124115 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@BahubaliLinee/6124119 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/58536816 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC1.00under a minute
@BahubaliLinee/6156087 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/588564721 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/589191126 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC@BahubaliLinee/6162354 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/59964592 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC@BahubaliLinee/6266884 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@BahubaliLinee/6266888 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine/59964633 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine42 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41–1)
@vsgline218 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 hours@vsgline2 (18–0)
@cricket_line_fast_news_app_live9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 hours@cricket_line_fast_news_app_live (7–2)
@wbt_ferrari_ground_cricbuzz_line8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9919 hours@wbt_ferrari_ground_cricbuzz_line (6–2)
@Quickline2476 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007.8 hours@Quickline247 (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 36 of the 36 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 123 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 32 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

LIVE (Watch Story )
@Livee_scoree_Line · Channel
112,981 subscribers
VSG LINE - MARKET STATS
@vsgline2 · Channel
106,638 subscribers
KING
@King_Analaysist · Channel
31,424 subscribers
Gʀᴏᴜɴᴅ Lɪɴᴇ™
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · Channel
30,843 subscribers
Ranbir Roy (VSG)
@ranbirroyofficialVsgDada · Channel
30,641 subscribers
ROLEX BHAI 👑
@bettingg · Channel
27,386 subscribers
KING
@shiv_Analayis · Channel
26,492 subscribers
QUICK LINE 247
@Quickline247 · Channel
24,122 subscribers
Shefalii Bagga
@ShefaliBaggaOfficiall · Channel
23,943 subscribers
Malik Mumbai Backup
@malikmumbaibackupk · Channel
23,412 subscribers
FERRARI LINE
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · Channel
18,449 subscribers
KARISHMA TIPS
@karishma_tips_krisha_session_mac · Channel
17,859 subscribers
WOMENS T20 BLAST SESSION
@womens_t20_blast_session · Channel
13,554 subscribers
GHODA LIVE TV LINE🏏🏏
@ghodaline · Channel
12,382 subscribers
PUNEET JACKPOT KING
@puneet_jackpot_punit_agarwal_tip · Channel
11,935 subscribers
Ishita Tips ♥️
@ishita_aditi_tips_karina_pandey · Channel
9,761 subscribers
TIGER LINE
@TigerLine786 · Channel
9,450 subscribers
CRICKET LINE GURU
@cricket_line_fast_news_app_live · Channel
9,375 subscribers
CRICBUZZ LINE
@wbt_ferrari_ground_cricbuzz_line · Channel
8,505 subscribers
Rapid Line
@Rapidlinee · Channel
8,294 subscribers
ADHEERA [ THE JACKPOT KING ]
@sessionq · Channel
7,083 subscribers
VIKRAM SINGH GANDHI
@vikram_singh_gandhi_ranbir_roy_7 · Channel
6,897 subscribers
TOSS MAFIYA
@baazigar_prediction · Channel
6,168 subscribers
JUPITER CRICKET PREDICTION
@toss_jupiter_cricket_prediction · Channel
5,888 subscribers
ALL CRICKET MATCH TOSS REPORT
@all_cricket_match_toss_report_fr · Channel
5,256 subscribers
FERRARI LINE
@ferrari_bullet_altair_groundline · Channel
4,206 subscribers
THE GODFATHER ⚡️
@cricketliveupdate6 · Channel
1 subscribers

4 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.

Growth

16,07417,94717,010.517,5686 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -379. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,793–18,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 06:4717,568-16
8 Nov 2026, 16:0717,584-10
7 Nov 2026, 10:3717,594-18
6 Nov 2026, 08:3617,612-2
5 Nov 2026, 09:5117,614-9
4 Nov 2026, 08:1917,623-8
3 Nov 2026, 06:2817,631-11
2 Nov 2026, 07:0817,642-16
1 Nov 2026, 08:3717,658-53
31 Oct 2026, 08:4517,711-36
30 Oct 2026, 06:4517,747-18
29 Oct 2026, 08:0617,765-9
28 Oct 2026, 07:3917,774-20
27 Oct 2026, 04:4717,794-25
26 Oct 2026, 02:4617,819-57
25 Oct 2026, 02:2917,876+824
24 Oct 2026, 02:2017,052-19
23 Oct 2026, 00:4917,071+997
22 Oct 2026, 01:4816,074-13
20 Oct 2026, 20:0616,087first reading

Engagement

1,090 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 75 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.333%
avg views ÷ 17,568 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.6
300 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
300
of 1,090 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held1,090 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total17,570
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
93
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 300 posts held from the last 30 days (1.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,090 posts we hold for @BahubaliLinee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@BahubaliLinee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @BahubaliLinee as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FERRARI LINE
@Ferrari_Bullet_Cricket_LiveLine · 18,449
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 2 October 2026
CRICKETT - L I N E
@crickettline · 21,471
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 14 August 2026
Gʀᴏᴜɴᴅ Lɪɴᴇ™
@GROUND_IPL_LIVE_LINE · 30,843
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
Baazigar...
@Baazigarbazigars · 24,131
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 14 September 2026
F E R R A R I
@RealFarrariLinee · 54,905
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 23 August 2026
Baazigar ™
@BazzigarRealBazzigar · 91,496
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 22 August 2026
🅶🅾🅻🅳🅼🅸🅽🅴🆂 by RKS
@goldminechannel · 32,947
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 15 August 2026
Vikram Singh Rathode..
@VSRPOWERR · 96,435
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
TIGER TOSS LINE™
@TIGERTOSSLINEE · 21,190
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 20 September 2026
Shrutika Arora
@Shrutika_Anjali_Arora · 21,656
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 4 October 2026
👑 Divya toss queen 👑
@ipl_bigbash_preidiction · 60,937
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 11 September 2026
जय बजरंग बली ( 2018 )
@Shubhamarjunn · 37,352
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 27 August 2026
Golu808080
@Golu808080 · 4
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 3 September 2026
Malik Mumbai Pro
@Malik_Mumbai_Pro_Channel · 56,908
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“B A H U B A L I” (@BahubaliLinee), 17,568 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BahubaliLinee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.