ThinQ IAS pinned «https://youtube.com/shorts/35v1_y210Hw?feature=share»

Channel
ThinQ IAS
@ThinQIAS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,044subscribers
+855 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001696137017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ThinQIAS |
| Description | Your one stop solution for CSE! A mentor guided initiative for UPSC CSE. For PSIR - t.me/thinqiaspsir Value Addition Notes! UPSC PYQ Solutions! UPSC Essay Strategy! UPSC Notes! UPSC Mentorship by Interview appeared! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ThinQIAS |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:27 | 30,044 | +5 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 09:57 | 30,039 | -9 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 30,048 | +84 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 29,964 | +101 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 29,863 | +31 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 29,832 | +18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 29,814 | +31 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 29,783 | +9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 29,774 | +25 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 29,749 | +24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 29,725 | +28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:55 | 29,697 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:47 | 29,703 | +17 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 29,686 | +22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 29,664 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 29,662 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 29,660 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 29,633 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 29,623 | +20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 29,603 | first reading |
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.9%
- avg views ÷ 30,044 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,290
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 72 (23 July 2026 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 55,920 |
| Reactions total | 87 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Oct 2026, 23:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 318
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 448
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,605 reactions across 55 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 796 | 49.6% | |
| 🔥 | 433 | 27.0% | |
| 😁 | 171 | 10.7% | |
| 😢 | 69 | 4.30% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 2.80% | |
| 💯 | 27 | 1.68% | |
| 👌 | 23 | 1.43% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 1.12% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 0.935% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 0.312% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.125% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.062% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,605 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtube.com/shorts/35v1_y210Hw?feature=share
❤7👍4
PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2017 ⬆️ Choose the correct option
- (a)71%
- (b)15%
- (c)10%
- (d)4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕰️ PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2017 Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) ? 1. It decides the RBI's benchmark interest rates. 2. It is a 12-member body including the Governor of RBI and is reconstituted every year. 3. It functions under the chairmanship of the Union Finance Minister. Select the correct answer using the code given below : (a) 1 only (b) 1 and 2 only (c…
❤3
🗞️ UPSC DAILY CA · 8 Oct 2026 · The Hindu · p.1 📌 RBI raises repo rate to 5.5%, shifts stance to 'calibrated tightening' 🧩 GS3 · Economy › Inflation & Monetary Policy 🔥 Must-read · 🎯 Prelims + Mains · 💡 Static Hook ⚡ Crux in one line The MPC raised the repo rate by 25 bp to 5.50%, ending a pause after 125 bp of cuts, because the West Asia conflict pushed up crude prices and CPI is expected to average about 5.8% ov…
❤6🙏1
🗞️ RBI raises repo rate to 5.5%, shifts stance to 'calibrated tightening' ⚡ The MPC raised the repo rate by 25 bp to 5.50%, ending a pause after 125 bp of cuts, because the West Asia conflict pushed up crude prices and CPI is expected to average about 5.8% over the next three quarters. GDP growth is still projected at 7.1% for 2026-27. 👇 Full UPSC breakdown & a real PYQ poll below
👌2❤1
PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2025 ⬆️ Choose the correct option
- (a)41%
- (b)38%
- (c)18%
- (d)3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🗞️ UPSC DAILY CA · 8 Oct 2026 · The Hindu · p.7 📌 India's cement footprint stands in its way to net-zero emissions 🧩 GS3 · Environment & Ecology › Climate Change 🔥 Must-read · 🎯 Prelims + Mains · 💡 Static Hook ⚡ Crux in one line Cement is hard to abate: about 60% of its CO2 comes from calcining limestone, not fuel. India emits 0.62 t CO2 per tonne of cement and output may rise nearly fivefold by 2070. Options incl…
🕰️ PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2025 Consider the following statements : Statement I : Studies indicate that carbon dioxide emissions from cement industry account for more than 5% of global carbon emissions. Statement II : Silica-bearing clay is mixed with limestone while manufacturing cement. Statement III : Limestone is converted into lime during clinker production for cement manufacturing. Which one of the following is cor…
❤1
🗞️ India's cement footprint stands in its way to net-zero emissions ⚡ Cement is hard to abate: about 60% of its CO2 comes from calcining limestone, not fuel. India emits 0.62 t CO2 per tonne of cement and output may rise nearly fivefold by 2070. Options include refuse-derived fuel, lower-clinker blended cements, public procurement of green cement, traditional lime binders and, finally, carbon capture. 👇 Full UPSC b…
❤2
Nobel Prize Physics 2026 Explained: IceCube Neutrino Observatory https://youtube.com/shorts/ICPrLMEV0Qs?feature=share
❤2
Brain Switch | Nobel Prize in Medicine 2026 | Optogenetics🏆🧠 #science https://youtube.com/shorts/qjSZCTiSuNc?feature=share
❤9💯3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @ThinQIAS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2017 ⬆️ Choose the correct option
- (a)71%
- (b)15%
- (c)10%
- (d)4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2025 ⬆️ Choose the correct option
- (a)41%
- (b)38%
- (c)18%
- (d)3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
PYQ · UPSC Prelims 2015 ⬆️ Choose the correct option
- (a)23%
- (b)18%
- (c)36%
- (d)23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@mehak_jainAIR17 · 59,930#1
@TeamKJS · 84,527#2
@csepaper2atish · 117,604#3
@darkhorsecse · 35,998#4
@PSIR_Civils_Front · 21,211#5
@psir101 · 10,317#6
@legendbhaiyaupsc · 81#7
@UPSCCSEMains2024 · 1,095#8
@csetopper · 174,558#9
@smartaspirants15 · 11,410#10
@Clearvisionforupsc · 66,342#11
@UPSC_ATEEQ · 6,736#12
@studymaterialandyou · 19,424#13
@UnderStandUPSC · 114,068#14
@chandarprabha289upsc · 8,745#15
@air17swati · 22,803#16
@theanonymousupscaspirant · 255,763#17
@POLITICALSCIENCEUGCNETJRFANDCSIR · 14,008#18
@X_IAS · 108,604#19
@SocioResources · 11,296#20
@vyasaiasofficial · 20,868#21
@SociologyOptionalAnswerWriting · 15,725#22
@QEP_2025 · 147 (as read 8 September 2026)#23
@TGPSC_MAINS · 6,569#24
@karmayogi_ias · 54,589#25
@UPSCPrelimsWithNeelesh · 40,419#26
@essaykaise1 · 23,520#27
@cdwarzone · 16,139#28
@UPSCFIX · 87,514#29
@upsccsechaicoffee · 2,535#30
@upsc_sarthi · 57,815#31
@justupscpyq · 33,312#32
@csepreparationAIR18way · 14,583#33
@socialcurrents · 3,791#34
@iascorridor · 25,656#35
@Neil_You · 16,454#36
@IASdwijgoel · 26,492#37
@sriasofficial · 30,944#38
@brainstormingsociologyca · 7,841#39
@StudySmartIASPCS · 31,552#40
@upscsupersimplified · 41,328#41
@freeupscmaterials2026 · 22,337#42
@SleepySociology · 13,217#43
@SleepyClasses · 83,684#44
@SociologyWithNeelesh · 6,261#45
@upscpdfs25 · 34,129#46
@sid_randheer · 6,376#47
@AnimeshPradhan_AIR2 · 61,945#48
@JatinJainAIR91 · 4,038#49
@upsc_essayy · 4,424#50
@csewarriors · 10,030#51
@PSIRbyKapilSikka · 6,553#52
@AyushiPradhanias · 8,639#53
@benjopjose · 16,456#54
@EnlightIAS8_official · 135,271#55
@UPSCFRATERNITY · 12,147#56
@neetishashtra · 12,300#57
@ias_raskun · 9,933#58
@VisionIAS_UPSC · 396,964#59
@synias · 5,811#60
@RajasthanAkhada · 757#61
@UPSCcafenotes · 7,742#62
@dheerajpanchal · 23,808#63
@iaspcspathshala · 187,504#64
@cse_toppers_notes · 44,306#65
@csp23info · 46,433#66
@UPPCS_PT · 12,091#67
@renotenotes · 1,938#68
@ReadersRepublic9 · 17,354#69
@SociologyTasks · 4,753#70
@sociomentor2 · 6,287#71
@AnCbyKJS · 8,314#72
@Official_Captain_Invincible · 10,213#73
@upsc_ethics_pdf · 9,529#74
@TheRobotNewspaper · 5,883#75
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@IASdwijgoel · 26,492
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
@sriasofficial · 30,944
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
@PSIR_Civils_Front · 21,211
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 September 2026
@UpscPrelimsTestSeriesss · 46,469
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
@drneharajput_ias · 19,536
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 September 2026
@asad_zuberi · 22,949
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@Clearvisionforupsc · 66,342
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@studymaterialandyou · 19,424
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 October 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThinQ IAS” (@ThinQIAS), 30,044 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ThinQIAS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.