$SEXY https://x.com/sexysynthetic/status/2073208274250236379?s=46&t=gO2-lsTdxBytgtsHygYxdQ

Channel
TedzCryptoAnn
@TedzCryptoAnn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002346834049 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TedzCryptoAnn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TedzCryptoAnn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 27 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 87
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 85
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
(SOL) Goblin 👺 6M push before cooling down around 5.5M — exactly the type of move that wakes the timeline up. Called this while it was still sitting in the trenches, and now the narrative is starting to spread everywhere. What’s making this even crazier is the amount of attention Goblins are suddenly getting online. Every big AI account keeps talking about how ChatGPT 5.5 is somehow “obsessed” with Goblins, and now…
I gave u 6k entry to all Almost 15x to everyone🔥🔥🔥
Photo, posted without a caption
https://pump.fun/coin/74QJe2wU8PeGqv4iKddUZLdDzHU2me6z9MLpBTfHpump gambled here . -amber
Photo, posted without a caption
BSC🟡🔥 #好想抄底,币安官方表情包里面塞得这个二创的表情包 ,考古,好想抄底 ,纯情绪盘🟡🔥 0x19dae32509d9f883c4d84a21f3975b5dec604444
Aped $VNUT 500k Funny meme, vaping squirrel getting lots of attention on X. Let’s see Watch your entry here dyor https://dexscreener.com/solana/8drcdmpftp8ddp4uqtog3brzdwhx2y5c3ykd3jkgbyzp
Just saw that the CEO of DOGEOS is following the $TARO X account and the CA ends with ‘doge’. 👀 6MFiqqkS4MUwmkoa8sj5UJcFzJGVxHD1yEpoyRRUdoge
So much game in here https://x.com/cyrilXBT/status/2034634956643737701?s=20
Did a quick 8X on this little gamble Solid gains always take profits folks, gonna recap more shortly who’s ready💹🍿
$Billy 7ggRo5RyxKrkqcujse5WbvG4cVCKtkiivfnoL849pump Dyor
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TedzCryptoAnn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,122,467 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@alphageeks · 13,4721 post🦇 BATMAN GAMBLE 🎲
@BatmanGamble · 4,0611 postBruisers Calls
@bruiserscalls · 22,3791 postBunny's Crypto Reviews ∆
@bunnycalls · 8,9961 postNatalia Calls || 娜塔莉亚的电话
@CobraGems · 10,2821 postDEGEN LABS 🧪
@DEGEN_LABS_OFFICIAL · 2121 post小胖交易中心(Dwen Marketing)
@Dwen_Exchange · 36,8451 postEdenCalls
@edenscalls · 5,7901 postkelu's calls
@kELUSCALLGOOOO · 4,3901 postKobe's Gambles
@kobesgambles · 16,4051 postSarah’s Promised Land ♡
@sarahonchain · 3,9641 postКриптон
@TonKrypTON · 9,9961 postWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 627,0831 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TedzCryptoAnn” (@TedzCryptoAnn), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TedzCryptoAnn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.