Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Точка Опоры для экспертов | Психолог, Коуч ICF

Channel

Точка Опоры для экспертов | Психолог, Коуч ICF

@TO_PSY

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,945subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001774853481
TypeChannel
Username@TO_PSY
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TO_PSY

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9232,0201,971.57 August 2026 — 2,006 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,006 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,010 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,011 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,016 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,020 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,005 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,995 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,998 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,936 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,938 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,928 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,923 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,930 subscribers24 September 2026 — 1,945 subscribers1,9457 August 202624 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 49 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,908–2,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 21:211,945+15
17 Sept 2026, 00:381,930+7
13 Sept 2026, 03:571,923-5
9 Sept 2026, 05:381,928-10
4 Sept 2026, 08:201,938+2
1 Sept 2026, 03:161,936-62
29 Aug 2026, 12:381,998+3
26 Aug 2026, 01:541,995-10
23 Aug 2026, 00:242,005-15
19 Aug 2026, 13:162,020+4
16 Aug 2026, 21:282,016+5
13 Aug 2026, 09:462,011+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:272,010+4
7 Aug 2026, 10:542,006no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:162,006first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

973 reactions across 19 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥23123.7%
💯17618.1%
custom 530794701077769533212012.3%
❤10410.7%
👍777.91%
🤝626.37%
🍾343.49%
💋282.88%
custom 5305425770485662054272.77%
🤩272.77%
⚡151.54%
custom 5310256019555762354141.44%
🆒141.44%
🎉131.34%
🤗90.925%
🏆70.719%
custom 532380047809657282360.617%
custom 533028012775232275440.411%
custom 530765714772985473130.308%
custom 532334026805583877020.206%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 973 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TO_PSY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC88 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @valhakudrivpudre

Ну мёд а не подкаст

🔥10💯9🤝6👍1🤩1🆒1

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC91 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🎤 Мне срочно нужен трафик! Рассказываю, почему я сейчас отказываю экспертам в коуч-группе и почему новые подписчики не решают проблему продаж. В тему подкаста: 🔗 80% экспертов не пройдут этот тест. 📲 Почему люди подписываются и почему уходят? ➡️ Рубрика #Саша_Дело_Говорит

💯13🎉11❤10🤝4custom 53079470107776953322👍1🤩1🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC127 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⬆️Научиться продавать не самая сложная задача. Гораздо сложнее: ⭕️ перестать бояться рассказывать о себе; ⭕️ перестать чувствовать, что навязываешься, когда говоришь о своих услугах; ⭕️ начать получать удовольствие от продаж. Именно это — главный результат работы со мной. Продажи могут стать интересными и естественным продолжением вашей экспертности. Я в это верю. Так работаю сама и помогаю прийти к этому своим кл…

💯17🔥16custom 530794701077769533211🤝2⚡1🤩1🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC115 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iskryschastia

Саша, прям я до встречи с тобой! Очень было страшно рассказывать о себе не то, чтобы продавать. А теперь я знаю как экологично продавать и кайфовать от этого❤️

❤13🔥12🤩11

3 Aug 2026, 08:58 UTC164 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

⬆️ Собрала программу Коуч-группы «Проявленность и Личный Бренд 2.0». … но если коротко, мы будем совершать действия: проявляться, создавать контент, внедрять. И, конечно, будем работать с тем, что не даёт эти действия совершать регулярно: — страх чужого мнения; — страх, что не получится; — страх осуждения; — саботаж и прокрастинация; — стыд в блоге и продажах. Группа идеально подойдет экспертам, которые: — устали …

🔥19custom 530794701077769533215custom 531025601955576235414👍6❤2🏆2🤩2

2 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC167 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @litsom_k_rebenku

О, Саша! Я себя узнала в этом подкасте. Именно с тобой я начала продавать, перестала себя обесценивать, перестала искать поводы, чтобы "не делать", а стала делать и получать результаты.

🔥20💯18🤝14❤3

2 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC167 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🎤 «Все вокруг продают, а я одна не могу. У меня есть знания и кейсы, но я не начинаю .. Как начать действовать?» Рассказываю, почему эксперт может иметь знания, кейсы и сильный продукт и всё равно не продавать. Почему новые обучения, очередная упаковка и десятый сертификат — это очень красивый способ не идти в продажи. А главное, что действительно помогает начать действовать ⚡️ Как всегда #Саша_Дело_Говорит

🔥22💯19👍14🆒3❤2🏆2⚡1

30 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC232 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

🎤 Почему идеальные эксперты вызывают меньше доверия? — чем сильнее мы стараемся выглядеть профессионально, тем больше дистанция между нами и аудиторией; — где граница между искренностью и «вывалить душу наизнанку»? — что действительно сближает с аудиторией? Если надоело «перекати-поле» под публикациями и тишина в заявках — послушай #Саша_Дело_Говорит ▶️ И приходи в группу «Проявленность и Личный Бренд 2.0».

💯21🔥19custom 530794701077769533216🎉1👍1🆒1custom 53302801277523227541

29 Jul 2026, 16:29 UTC222 views96 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подкаст переносится по очень уважительной причине! ❤️ Сегодня у нас 4 года со дня свадьбы, а я опять забыла… пожалуй это превращается в нашу летнюю традицию)) Поэтому сегодня выбрала не работу, а нас. Ну и поздравления принимаются ⤵️

🍾34custom 530542577048566205427💋19custom 53238004780965728236❤5custom 53302801277523227543custom 53233402680558387702

28 Jul 2026, 17:54 UTC224 views62 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, про мат! 📱 Я тут в Threads запустила личный челлендж «без мата» 🍿 Делюсь наблюдениями в реальном времени: про клиентов, про котов и про то, как тяжело быть кулюторным экспертом, когда жизнь подкидывает приколы. И спасибо, что выше делитесь мнениями про идеальность. Завтра запишу подкаст и разберу, почему глянец в экспертном блоге скорее отталкивает. Есть что сказать…

🔥22custom 530794701077769533219👍13❤3💯2🤩2🆒1

28 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC211 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⬆️ Отличный вопрос! Обсудим? Пишите в комментариях под этим постом.

❤10💯9🤝6custom 53076571477298547313🤗1

28 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC202 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @miliuchihina_psy

Кстати, действительно послушала бы мнения на тему идеальности)) Поделитесь: у кого это вызывает доверие и экспертизу, а кого отталкивает? 🤔

❤16💯10🤝9

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TO_PSY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Текст в тексте
@textvtexte · 22,321
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Точка Опоры для экспертов | Психолог, Коуч ICF” (@TO_PSY), 1,945 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TO_PSY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.