Channel
@TONSharksNFT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001751966315 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TONSharksNFT |
| Description | Main chat Eng\Ru @ English: @TONShark_NFT Asia: @TONSharksNFT_Asia |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TONSharksNFT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 41 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 41 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
128 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 84 | 65.6% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 24.2% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.47% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 4.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2022 to 2 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Возможно некоторые уже заметили что им начали поступать на счет жетоны LPX. В рамках площадки Looplex в ближайшее время запуститься партнерский проект TON Nard - это нарды не выходя из телеграм. Будет реализована функция обмена жетонов LPX на игровые фишки, а так же возможность получать за них уникальные по внешнему виду NFT игровые поля, кости и т.д.
🔥7👍2
На акуленка под номером #60 проходит аукцион. Рарность: Common + 1,000 LPX Длительность 1 час https://getgems.io/collection/EQBjJnKi12-vzxSPoyWKTbmkLKsdWI8q22Xrk3WsFzMVadNA/EQBGYq9O2Kak6Xe_CaKL70HugiwYGHjrrety7nB6-MifAIOj
🔥8
На акуленка под номер #48 проходит аукцион. Его фон уникален и будет представлен в единственном экземпляре. Так же победитель аукциона получит 10 000 жетонов LPX. В случае если цена продажи на аукционе превысит 100 TON то кол-во жетонов будет увеличено до 30 000. Начальная цена 30 ТОН https://getgems.io/collection/EQBjJnKi12-vzxSPoyWKTbmkLKsdWI8q22Xrk3WsFzMVadNA/EQAXMYGqb7y4a5VG02Bw7Px5ZohElBxYZeaGAIkIKdQTF3Fo
🔥7👍1
На первом этапе раздачи жетонов каждый холдер акулят получит жетоны LPX из расчета 1 TON - 100 LPX. В ближайшее время они начнут поступать на баланс. В будущем по мере развития проекта Looplex коэффициент будет уменьшаться. Так же сообщаем вам что пресейл закрыт и пока возможность приобретения акулят остается на вторичном рынке. В честь минта 50 акуленка мы так же проведем аукцион на одно NFT
Beta Roadmap Так же в ближайшее время мы начнем раздачу жетонов среди холдеров Акул, Горилл и некоторых партнерских проектов. В будущем вы сможете использовать эти жетоны на площадке Looplex, либо обменять их на NFT \ TON
🔥9
В ближайшем будущем мы запустим площадку Looplex - dex\marketplace для обмена игровыми предметами, аккаунтами, валютой и т.д. Looplex будет выступать в роли моста между традиционными торговыми площадками. У нас геймеры и ре-селлеры со всего мира смогут обмениваться с помощью TON Payments
🔥7
https://getgems.io/collection/EQBjJnKi12-vzxSPoyWKTbmkLKsdWI8q22Xrk3WsFzMVadNA
🔥9
Всем привет! Рады сообщить, что совсем скоро наши акулы отправятся в свое первое плавание! А это значит, каждый из вас сможет увидеть их во всей красе. Минт начинается в ближайшее время и NFT будут отправлены на кошельки из WL в порядке очереди.
🔥17
Не хотите ли пообедать лапшой с акулятинкой? Тем временем, нам не до обеда! Впереди минт и широкая компания по продвижению коллекции. Будьте вместе с нами!
👍11🔥4
Месяц назад команды TON Sharks, @TON_NFT_COLLECTION и @TONs_of_Gorillas организовывали выставку NFT в Москве. Мероприятие оказалось настолько успешным, что было решено прыгнуть выше плавника и ветки, устроив ещё более масштабный ивент. Это будет первая в мире TON NFT выставка! В ближайшую неделю мы объявим дату и место нашего следующего мероприятия, на котором, к слову, будут и наши NFT. Будем очень рады видеть вас …
🔥5❤3
Акулы — настоящие хищники метавселенных. Но даже они могут быть милыми и забавными! Держитесь! К берегам The Open Network приближается кровожадная пиратская шхуна. Вы будете хрустеть на наших зубах, словно печеньки Oreo.
👍10🔥4
💎 The First NFT Exhibition Sponsored by TON Society, Getgems.io and Rocketon.org. On 29 April, over 2,000 NFT fans, creators, and developers gathered at the NFT exhibition to celebrate NFT art projects worldwide. The Open Network’s first-ever digital art exhibition was organized by Artur Fadeev from TON community, Telegram channels Louis Ivanovich Vuiton, NFT CONF, and TON NFT Collection. The event saw many notab…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TONSharksNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 680,910 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TONSharksNFT named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON NFT Sharks” (@TONSharksNFT), 41 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TONSharksNFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.