Channel
@CryptoGreenEng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
209subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001616415863 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoGreenEng |
| Created | 13 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoGreenEng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 209 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 209 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 13 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
41 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 43.9% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 22.0% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2022 to 10 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hi all! 🔥 All the May holidays we not only rested, but also of course worked in honor of the environment and of course our collection! Well, if in essence, then we were ennobling the territory that we have for planting our trees, or rather your nft 🥰 We have finally signed all the necessary papers with the Botanical Garden of the Russian Federation and are ready to plant all your trees, aka NFT 🥳 Well, in the spi…
🔥2❤1
Crypto Green ENG pinned a photo
Pre-sale? 🧐 🔥 Yes, we are launching our first presale round with the sale of 1000 Common NFT and 200 Rare Tree NFT And what are the prices? 🌲Common Tree NFT - 30 TON 🌳Rare Tree NFT - 500 TON And where to buy? The collection is available for purchase on the marketplace from our friends from BITON! The guys made it possible to buy NFT without authorization 😉 Your procedure: 1. Choose your favorite green friend…
❤3
What is the value of NFT Crypto Green? 1️⃣ Combining with the real world of ecology We differ from everyone else in that our NFT is not just a picture, but a whole digital document of the ownership of the tree that we will plant. By purchasing the NFT of our collection, you just buy a picture, but also support the global ecology 🧙♀️ 2️⃣ Real Crypto Product Yes, we are doing not only the NFT Crypto Green collecti…
🔥6
And here is the NFT of rare trees 🔥😉
🔥5❤3👍3
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍3
Hello everyone We made our own stickers🥳🔥
❤8🥰1
Hello everyone As we said earlier, we are launching - DAO CryptoGreen 🔥 What will the participant of our DAO get ? - Community of like-minded people - The opportunity to work with us - Participate in the development of the project - The opportunity to get to our private parties - Exclusive investment analytics There will be two ways to get into the DAO 🧑🚀 1) Own two NFTs 2) Pay for a 10 TON monthly subscription …
👍3
Hello everyone! Today we have prepared our updated roadmap 🔥 1st quarter of 2022 - Market analysis and idea formation - Project development - Launching the DAO - Conducting a presale round 2nd quarter of 2022 - Official mint and listing on marketplaces - Preparation and planting of trees - Integration into the metaverse - Conclusion of partnerships with foundations and companies 3rd quarter of 2022 - Integration…
❤3
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @CryptoGreenEng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 981,731 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CryptoGreenEng named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Green ENG” (@CryptoGreenEng), 209 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoGreenEng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.