Channel
@Kbuzz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,465subscribers
+354 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001450622035 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kbuzz |
| Description | ≌𝐖𝐞 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐊𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐧 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐈𝐂, 𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐌𝐀, 𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐘𝐋𝐄 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐞! 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐝𝐨 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝗔𝗱𝘀 ⎇ @KbuzzAds᭨ 𝗨𝗡𝗞 ⎇ @ARCHIVEkbuzz᭨ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kbuzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 17,465 | -49 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 17,514 | +485 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 17,029 | -29 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 17,058 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 17,078 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 17,097 | -14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 17,111 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 177,730 |
| Reactions total | 8,792 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,792 reactions across 37 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 1,528 | 17.4% | |
| 💔 | 1,091 | 12.4% | |
| 😐 | 855 | 9.72% | |
| 🤣 | 616 | 7.01% | |
| 💅 | 612 | 6.96% | |
| 🤯 | 550 | 6.26% | |
| 💘 | 548 | 6.23% | |
| ❤🔥 | 487 | 5.54% | |
| 🤬 | 430 | 4.89% | |
| 👍 | 401 | 4.56% | |
| 🥴 | 294 | 3.34% | |
| 🙏 | 256 | 2.91% | |
| 👎 | 215 | 2.45% | |
| 🤷 | 193 | 2.20% | |
| 🔥 | 178 | 2.02% | |
| 🥰 | 176 | 2.00% | |
| 🍓 | 118 | 1.34% | |
| 👀 | 54 | 0.614% | |
| 😘 | 34 | 0.387% | |
| 💋 | 31 | 0.353% | |
| 14 further kinds | 125 | 1.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,792reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Kbuzz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
‼️ بیتیاس (خصوصاً نامجون و جیهوپ) بخاطر حمایت علنی، حضور تو کنسرت و تعامل نزدیک و صمیمیشون با مجرم ”کریس براون “ 🤢 (ابیوزر و زن ستیز، متجاوز، سابقه خشونت جنسی، کتک زدن زنان و..) بشدت بین مردم منفور شدن و توسط فندون خودشون هم دارن کنسل میشن. ᯓ @Kbuzz
🤬248👀18😐16🤯11
Posted without readable text
😭81🤣23👌5👍1
بوی گروپ ایرانی-کیپاپی رو هم دیدین دیگه؟ 😬
👎64😭14👍6🤯2
یه بوی گروپ ترک (ترکیهای) با اسم ”کراش“ چند روزیه شروع بکار کردن و دبیو ترکشون حسابی سروصدا کرده. 🇹🇷 یه سری هم دارن بهشون هیت میدن و میگن استایل کیپاپ رو کپی کردن درحالی که اصلا بهشون نمیخوره و بد از آب درامده. ᯓ @Kbuzz
❤🔥118🤣58👍14🤯3
دنبال یه چنل از آپدیت های کورتیسای؟؟🔝
💘5💯2
💭 : بیشتر از همه به چه کسایی احترام میذارین؟؟ مارتین ᠉فکر کنم سونبهـهامون. مارتین گفت به بیتیاس و توباتو سونبههاشون احترام زیادی میذاره و یکی از دلایلی که برای بیگهیت اودیشن داده، همین بوده.
🍓85🤣25❤🔥6💘5
سولیون انمیکس وقتی ازش پرسیدن به خدا یا دین خاصی اعتقاد داره یا نه: «من مذهبی نیستم (ولی هیچ شانسی رو از دست نمیدم) و تو روزای مهم به درگاه همهی خدایان دعا میکنم.» 🙏 ᯓ @Kbuzz
🙏256🤣146😭18🤝6
❗وینتر و جونگکوک یه پست در مورد ”زیبایی پرتره جدید ماه“ رو هردو باهم تو اینستاگرام لایـک کردن 🌑؛ و امروز تو انجمنای کره ای یه پست با این متن ”جونگ کوک و وینتر دیگه حتی سعی هم نمیکنن پنهانش کنن ! شاید اگه این اتفاقات یک یا دو بار میافتاد میگفتیم تصادفیه، اما وقتی اینهمه موضوع و نشونهٔ به هم متصل دور و بر این دو نفر رو میگیره، واقعاً سخته باور کنیم که با هم قرار نمیرن![...]“ خیلی ویو گرفته. از اون سمت یه سری فنا …
🤷193🌚12👀6💯5
این عکس چااونوو از دیروز نزدیک 3 میلیون ویو گرفته و مردم براش گگ شدن و فکر کردن واقعیه؛ اما یه ادیت ساختهشده با AIـه و عکس واقعی سمت راستیه. 🫢 ᯓ @Kbuzz
🔥178👀16💋7😭3
خــــفن ترین چنل از 𝖢𝖮𝖱𝖳𝖨𝖲 قطعا اینجــــاست 🍅 🖇️ جــواب کدوم سـوال رو نمـیدونی؟! تـپ تـپ کن روش چرا مارتـین قبل از دبیو معروف بود؟ 🔝 🌟##@?? کدوم عضو توی المپیـــک اجرا داشته؟ راز اسم گروه کورتیس چیه؟ کدوم عــضو چندسال خارج از کره زندگی کرده؟ ## فکـــتهایی از کورتیس که خیلی از کوئــر ها هم نمیدونن 💢 🍅 تــــ🧛ــرجمه، آپـــــدیت و تمام ❗️ برنامههای کورتـــــیس :: cortis🥹
🎅7⚡3💯1
➖
💅7💯1
ریوجین ایتزی اخیراً آهنگ ’REDRED‘ کورتیس رو کاور کرده و بخاطرمهارتـش واکنشای خوبی گرفته.🤩 اما همزمان یه بحث داغ بین کیپاپرا راه افتاده؛ و یه توییت با 50K لایک گفته بود ”غمانگیزه که ایتزی یه زمانی یکی از بزرگترین گروه نسل چهار بود، اما حالا برای جلب توجه باید سراغ هایپ آیدلای تازهکار بره“..❕ ᯓ @Kbuzz
💔338😭13❤🔥8👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Kbuzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Kbuzz named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙆׳ 𝘽𝙪𝙯𝙯 🐝” (@Kbuzz), 17,465 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kbuzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.