3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between â snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean âno change observedâ, never âinterpolatedâ. The vertical axis spans 6,791â6,811 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log â every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:17
6,793
-15
12 Aug 2026, 19:03
6,808
-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:45
6,809
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 20 April 2026 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ¡ 30 days
14.8%
avg views á 6,793 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.14%
reactions á views ¡ ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) á viewsâ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramâs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ¡ latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
18 (20 April 2026 â 31 July 2026)
Views total
2,017
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface â not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than âcorrectingâ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form â 8.12K, 3.7M â so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded â read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
644 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
â¤
544
84.5%
đ
30
4.66%
â¤âđĽ
23
3.57%
đ
18
2.80%
đ
10
1.55%
đ
8
1.24%
đ
5
0.776%
âĄ
2
0.311%
đ
2
0.311%
đŻ
2
0.311%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities â đ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another â so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one â 4.34K, 1.2M â so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramâs own count on each post â not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above â those same posts carry 644reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by âa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageâ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
4 Weeks to New U (Batch 8) is Back!!!!
September ááážáŹ á áááşáááˇáşáĄáááşá¸ááźá áşááąáááˇáş (á) á ááźááŻááźáŽá¸ Form áá˝ááˇáşááąá¸ááŹá¸ááŤáááşá
4 Weeks to New U áááŻáᏠáá áşááĄáá˝ááşá¸áážáŹ áááŻááşáˇááŻáśá áśá áĄáá˝áąá¸áĄááąáŤáşáĄáá áşáá˝áąááᯠááážáááŹá áąáááŻáˇáá˛áˇ English Language ááąáˇááŹáá˛áˇáĄá፠áááŻááźáŽá¸ systematic ááťá áąáááŻáˇáĄáá˝ááş ááąáˇá áĽáşááá°ááŽáá˛áˇ Task áá˝áąááᯠááŻááşááąáŹááşááááşáˇ Program ááąá¸ááźá áşááŤáááşá
áĄááąáˇáĄááťááˇáşááąáŹááşá¸ááąá¸áá˝áąááᯠááťááŻá¸ááąáŹááşááťááşáá˛áśáá°áááŻááşá¸ Join áááˇáşááŤáááşá
- áááşáááŻáá°áá˝áąááťážáąáŹáâŚ
ááážá áşá Maybe next year áááŻáˇááźáąáŹáá˛áˇááŹááąá¸ ááŽááąáˇááąáŹáˇ ááááşááźá áşáá˛áˇááŤááźáŽ đŤś
TSL 2026 International Debate áá˛áˇ Final round ááᯠááááąáááşááźááŻááşáááąáŹáˇáážáŹááŤ
I did it guys!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @youtheduhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramâs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly â each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseâs query is independent of having been queried itself.
English Stories Moral Novels @StoryPage ¡ 133,104 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here â alongside 90 others â read 13 August 2026
Books for You(á áŹáĄáŻááşá áŹááą) @booksforyou1986 ¡ 138,077 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here â alongside 67 others â read 13 August 2026
Learn English Grammar | Language @Grammar6 ¡ 126,194 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 89 here â alongside 88 others â read 13 August 2026
English Phrasal Verbs @PhrasalCards ¡ 113,004 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here â alongside 93 others â read 14 August 2026
Learn English Idioms Language @Idiomsland ¡ 169,552 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 89 here â alongside 88 others â read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramâs list for THAT channel, not this one â see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 â this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
âđđđđđ đ´đđ đˇđđâ (@youtheduhub), 6,793 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/youtheduhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ¡ JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.