Channel
@Novels_English_Books_Magazines
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
218,257subscribers
-188 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001159423770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Novels_English_Books_Magazines |
| Created | 15 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Novels_English_Books_Magazines |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 218,257 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 218,276 | -40 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 218,316 | -38 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 218,354 | -34 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 218,388 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 218,385 | -61 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 218,446 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 218,445 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 218,445 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,418 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 908 | 64.0% | |
| 👍 | 201 | 14.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 119 | 8.39% | |
| 🙏 | 36 | 2.54% | |
| 🕊 | 34 | 2.40% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 2.05% | |
| 🤡 | 24 | 1.69% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 1.20% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 1.06% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 0.987% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 0.776% | |
| 🌚 | 7 | 0.494% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 0.212% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 21 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What use is our time if not to create memories of conversations, meals, vacations, and other experiences? When we fail to focus deeply on any one thing, we focus instead only on the "highlights" of what we're doing and, as a consequence, later forget how we spent our time,
❤692👍141🙏36🕊33🤡22❤🔥16👏16🔥14
if you are somebody who is into creative things like painting, writing, or other forms of art, boredom can be of great help because you will not settle for anything of the ordinary, You keep rediscovering things, and this will ultimately lead to polishing your craft.
❤96❤🔥83👍34🔥14🤔7🌚3👌2🤡2
It is well to respect the leader. Learn from him. Observe him. Study him. But don't worship him. Believe you can S urpass, Believe you can go beyond. Those who harbor the second-best attitude are invariably second-best doers.
❤120👍26❤🔥20🌚4👎3👌1👏1🔥1
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @Novels_English_Books_Magazines. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“English Books Magazines Novels” (@Novels_English_Books_Magazines), 218,257 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Novels_English_Books_Magazines.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.