Channel
@DataRepublican
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12,817subscribers
+3,184 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002445515341 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DataRepublican |
| Description | Crunching fedgov spending, election data, maps, code, more. Elon Musk - "Worth following". Charlie Kirk - "You're a must follow". |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DataRepublican |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 12,817 | +4,521 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 8,296 | -1,337 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 9,633 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 9,633 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,414 |
| Reactions total | 28 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 13 | 46.4% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 39.3% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We all want to be part of something bigger than ourselves. What approaches will help you get there? 🤔⠀ ⠀ A person with a growth mindset sees success as a result of hard work, and it truly is! While innate abilities are important, these abilities can also be improved. 💡 Congratulations again to all participants, everything went smoothly. Send your investment request, as a new mining session has started. Don't forget…
Investors are profiting from the cryptocurrency market every second, and you can be part of this success by joining the mining investment opportunity. Now is the perfect time to take advantage of our promotion package and start earning from cryptocurrency mining. The best way to determine if cryptocurrency mining is the right investment for you is to try different opportunities. Over time, you will see how it can be…
The best time to invest was yesterday. The second best time is now. Don't wait for opportunities - seize them today! If you are reading this and still hesitating: this is your sign to act. 📌 Bitcoin is not a trend - it is a once in a lifetime opportunity. Start today. Buy Bitcoin. Activate your capital.
We are currently at a particularly profitable stage in the cryptocurrency market. Now is the ideal time to invest and take advantage of the current market opportunities. If you haven't invested yet, there is a risk of missing out on valuable opportunities. Congratulations to those who have already participated in our investment services and are enjoying their returns.
Many users in this channel started investing without really knowing what Bitcoin is, and yet, thanks to our investment services, they are earning significant profits. Don't be shy to ask questions if you don't know anything. In fact, this is the best way to ask questions. Be curious, not skeptical.
I am always happy to acknowledge the ongoing success of our investors, many of whom achieve significant financial milestones through carefully selected investment opportunities. Keep growing higher, and those who have not yet invested are encouraged to submit your investment request today.
https://x.com/i/status/2085904818757947592
https://x.com/i/status/2085828996940312748
https://x.com/i/status/2084382117811597677
❤3
Posting for an associate of mine: Madeline Avillion is the daughter of a close friend of mine Tony Avillion retired Chief Warrant Officer from the 160th. I’ve known him since we were 15 years old. He’s one of the good ones, and this is his daughter. Madeline she is 30 years old. She was last seen Friday morning, July 31st around 6:00 a.m. in the 1800 block of Belmont Road NW in DC. She’s 5’2”, about 100 pounds, blo…
🙏7
Start your journey into the world of cryptocurrency trading today! Join the successful investors who are making smart decisions in the cryptocurrency market. To get started, provide the following information: ✅Full Name ✅Phone Number ✅Email Address Contact me directly via the link below to start your investing journey with confidence⬇️ https://t.me/DataRepublicanofficiaI
We don’t just grow portfolios – we change lives. Because when you build wealth the right way, freedom comes. And I get it – everyone sees promises online. Flamboyant claims, risky bets and wildly successful dreams. That’s not what we do here. What we offer is simple: a clear, proven plan that turns smart capital into consistent growth. It’s not about overnight wins. It’s about playing the right game, at the right …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DataRepublican. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 182,075 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DataRepublican (small r)” (@DataRepublican), 12,817 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DataRepublican.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.