Nvidia hits a new all-time high, market value nears $6 trillion
❤7

Channel
@Sharemarkettimes_India
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
41,837subscribers
-800 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001383930474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sharemarkettimes_India |
| Description | Your source for simplified stock market insights! Led by qualified experts with 8+ years of experience in finance & markets. ✅ Stocks | IPOs | Trends ✅ Learn smart. Invest better. 📩 Contact: @Sharemarkettimes_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sharemarkettimes_India |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 41,837 | -117 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 41,954 | -35 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 41,989 | -38 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 42,027 | -33 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 42,060 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 42,093 | -45 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 42,138 | -50 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 42,188 | -43 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 42,231 | -26 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:44 | 42,257 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 42,274 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 42,283 | -28 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 42,311 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 42,324 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 42,329 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 42,351 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 42,357 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 42,366 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 42,395 | -37 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 42,432 | first reading |
998 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 417 of 475 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 998 (10 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,241,922 |
| Reactions total | 3,165 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 15:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,031 reactions across 815 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,296 | 71.2% | |
| 😱 | 696 | 11.5% | |
| 🔥 | 421 | 6.98% | |
| 🤔 | 296 | 4.91% | |
| 👍 | 248 | 4.11% | |
| 👏 | 74 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 849 of the 998 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,031 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 998 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Sharemarkettimes_India. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 998 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Nvidia hits a new all-time high, market value nears $6 trillion
❤7
🇺🇸 US JOB DATA | SEPTEMBER 2026 • Nonfarm Payrolls: 29K vs 162K previous | Est. 90K • Unemployment Rate: 4.2% vs 4.1% previous | Est. 4.1% • Average Hourly Earnings MoM: 0.1% vs 0.3% previous | Est. 0.3%
❤8😱3👍1
Current Mainboard and SME IPO
❤5
𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗢𝗥 𝗢𝗥𝗗𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗜𝗡𝗦 – 𝟭 𝗢𝗖𝗧𝗢𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝗦𝗧𝗟 𝗧𝗘𝗖𝗛 • Subsidiary wins USD 1.2 Bn optical connectivity supply agreement. 𝗚𝗣𝗧 𝗜𝗡𝗙𝗥𝗔 • Three railway contracts totaling ₹540.32 Cr secured. 𝗧𝗗 𝗣𝗢𝗪𝗘𝗥 𝗦𝗬𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗠𝗦 • ₹192 Cr order for generators in the US. 𝗡𝗕𝗖𝗖 • ₹28.78 Cr in new construction work orders. 𝗛𝗘𝗚 • ₹127.35 Cr order from Indus Towers for Lithium-Ion Battery Banks. 𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗘𝗥 𝗣𝗢𝗪𝗘𝗥 • ₹72.77 Cr contract for HTLS conductors. 𝗛𝗜…
❤6
📊 TODAY’S BROKERAGE CALLS | 2 OCTOBER 2026 HAL — Jefferies BUY | 🎯 ₹6,800 ICICI LOMBARD — Jefferies BUY | 🎯 ₹2,150 ONGC — Jefferies BUY | 🎯 ₹310 BPCL — Jefferies BUY | 🎯 ₹410 NEWGEN SOFTWARE — Jefferies BUY | 🎯 ₹630 KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK — Macquarie OUTPERFORM | 🎯 ₹500 BANK OF BARODA — Macquarie OUTPERFORM | 🎯 ₹280 M&M FINANCIAL SERVICES — Macquarie OUTPERFORM | 🎯 ₹395 LIC HOUSING FINANCE — Macquarie OUTPERFOR…
❤4
US ON INDIA TRADE DEAL Had a very constructive conversation with Minister Piyush Goyal Continuously trying to finish the trade deal with India We are in the short strokes, towards the end of it No, there is nothing imminent Have identified the universe of items that are sticking points President Trump and Prime Minister Modi may have another call very soon to assess progress and where we are
👍2❤1
SRIT India IPO Allotment Live Check here 👇 Https://ipostatus.kfintech.com/
🤔2
Shah Investor Home IPO Allotment Live Check here 👇 https://in.mpms.mufg.com/Initial_Offer/public-issues.html
https://www.beyours.in/collections/app-shirt?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=may2026⠋ Crazy deal.. 😁😁 Flat 50% OFF is available on this clothing website, and they also have a return policy. Thank me later! 😎
🔥1
NIFTY WEEKLY VIEW 👇👇 https://x.com/Sharemarkettime/status/2105645022049882277
❤1
📊 FII & DII NET FLOW | 1 OCTOBER 2026 🟢 DII: +₹10,041.84 Cr 🔴 FII/FPI: -₹9,484.22 Cr 🟢 NET BUY: ₹557.62 Cr
🔥7
HDFCBank Appoints Anup Bagchi As MD & CEO w.e.f. Oct 27, 2026 For 3 Years 👉RBI Approves Anup Bagchi As HDFC Bank MD & CEO For 3 Years
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 998 posts we hold for @Sharemarkettimes_India. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Applying for NSE IPO ?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🌡️ Tempsens Instruments IPO?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which IPOs will you apply for? 🤔 (You can select multiple options!)
The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Dhoot Transmission IPO?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 998 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Share Market Times” (@Sharemarkettimes_India), 41,837 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sharemarkettimes_India.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.