SCI at 297/295 TARGET 310 (Intraday) / 350/390/450/500 (Final) SL 260 SWING Weekly -view https://smtstockmarkettoday.com/terms INVESTOR CHARTER and disclosure https://smtstockmarkettoday.com/investor-charter BASED ON PRICE ACTION- Make or Break as of now. Do your own analysis

Channel
Equity Insight - Sebi Registered
@Equityinsightofficials
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,388subscribers
-230 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001756317130 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Equityinsightofficials |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Equityinsightofficials |
Previous handles
@Equityinsightofficials was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 26 August 2026 – 26 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 25,388 | -20 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 25,408 | no change |
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 25,408 | -98 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 25,506 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 25,527 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 25,540 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 25,563 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 25,583 | -23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 25,606 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:40 | 25,618 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 25,618 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 1 September 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.48%
- avg views ÷ 25,388 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 375
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.216%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (1 September 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,621 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
LCL looking Good
NIFTY 1 HOUR BULLISH PATTERN FORMED NOW MAY BE WE SAY GOOD RECOVERY IN NEXT WEEK
Profit watchlist!
Strong Breakout Candidate! PHOENIXLTD 1- Base Breakout 2- Holding Up-Well 3- Trading Above all key moving averages 4- Unfolding Wave 5 Keep on Radar. Potential Upside Stock!
❤1
🔥NSE IPO - India’s biggest stock exchange is finally heading towards the public market. - But the real story of the NSE IPO may be hidden in its shareholder list. NSE is reportedly targeting a 21 Sep 2026 opening, with the IPO expected to be entirely an OFS. - That means NSE itself won’t receive the IPO proceeds existing shareholders will sell their stakes. And look at who sits behind NSE: - LIC: 10.72% - Arand…
Stocks Watchlist POSITIVE Axiscades Tech-BM on Sept.5 for Rs 200cr fundraise via NCDs Muthoot Finance-Shareholder nod for re-appointment of MD, CEO Jeena Sikho Lifecare - To expand Ayurvedic healthcare portfolio Jindal Worldwide, Shivalik Bimetal Controls -Re-appointment of MD GMR Airports-CARE Ratings upgraded on existing NCBs Power Grid- Wins bid for Rajasthan REZ transmission project Kabra Extrusion Techni…
❤1
SSWL 210 to 330 All Given Targets hit at 360 Revised Targets at 400 and 430
I wont apply any of these IPO.. Deepa jewellers Rays of belief Purple style labs Just waste of time to apply such small size IPOs in such bad market conditions 👍🏻
❤1
Adani Ports handles record monthly cargo volume of 50 MMT in August, up 19% YoY, while container volume rose 15% YoY
📌 MAJOR ORDER WINS | SEPT 01, 2026 HFCL - ₹2,329 Cr — OFC supply order from a multinational TEXRAIL - ₹1,150+ Cr — Wagon supply & locomotive export orders SICALLOG - ₹534.73 Cr — 5-year coal extraction contract SATANIBRG - ₹375.56 Cr — Industrial manufacturing order MARINE - ₹229.73 Cr — Power distribution system order SUGSLLOYD - ₹214.27 Cr — Power infrastructure contracts AARVI - ₹174.73 Cr — Manpower servic…
Due to an internal error, some older channel messages were deleted by our intern. We regret the inconvenience caused and are working to restore or re-share important information
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Equityinsightofficials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@greenbullinr · 33,416
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 4 September 2026
@MONEYVIEWSIN · 53,961
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Equity Insight - Sebi Registered” (@Equityinsightofficials), 25,388 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Equityinsightofficials.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.