Channel
@futuregenfinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,423subscribers
-246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001352915870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @futuregenfinance |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/futuregenfinance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 14,423 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 14,434 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:49 | 14,443 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 14,456 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 14,463 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 14,465 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 14,480 | -16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 14,496 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 14,515 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 14,520 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 14,529 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 14,538 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 14,546 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 14,563 | -19 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 14,582 | -23 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 14,605 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 14,606 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 14,620 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 14,626 | -17 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 14,643 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
224 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 38.8% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 12.9% | |
| 😁 | 26 | 11.6% | |
| 🤯 | 26 | 11.6% | |
| 👎 | 25 | 11.2% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 5.36% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 2.23% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 😐 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 😴 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2026 to 16 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
India has dropped from 4th to 6th in the global GDP ranking, with the country's explosive growth at the end of 2025 cooling off to start 2026. Here are the top 6 countries: 1. United States: $32.38 trillion 2. China: $20.85 trillion 3. Germany: $5.25 trillion 4. Japan: $4.38 trillion 5. United Kingdom: $4.26 trillion 6. India: $4.15 trillion
🤯19❤11👎10🔥1
Signed NHL Finance (admin)
Benjamin Netanyahu rejects President Trump’s ceasefire and says the war will continue against Iran at any time he chooses.
😱12🤡5❤1
Signed Nihal
Investors Shouldn't Mistake Cease-Fire With Iran for a Resolution — Market Talk A two-week cease-fire is welcome for risk assets, but such patterns have happened before, and uncertainty can persist, says Josh Gilbert, market analyst at eToro. "Ultimately, it's important that investors don't get ahead of themselves. We've seen Trump set and extend deadlines multiple times before, and a two-week window is not a perman…
❤8
Signed Nihal
Nirmala Sitharaman just said that Indian rupee ₹ is doing okay Meanwhile, $1 = ₹94
😁15❤3🤬3👎2
Signed Nihal
🇺🇸 Massive Million-Strong Protests Against Trump in the U.S. Across America, including in Minneapolis, crowds gathered to protest Trump, his administration, and his policies. Today's "No King" demonstrations saw millions take to the streets in cities nationwide. More than 8 million peoples
❤15🔥6
Signed Nihal
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Stocks down. Bonds down. Gold down. Usually when stocks crash, gold and bonds go up. That's the whole point of them. Not this month. Everything is down simultaneously and there is nowhere to hide because the thing breaking the market isn't a recession or a rate decision. It's a war nobody knows how to price because nobody knows when it ends. Source: CNN
❤2
Signed Nihal
Photo, posted without a caption
🤯3
Signed Nihal
BREAKING: 🇮🇷 🇺🇸 🇨🇳 Iran considering allowing oil tankers to pass the Strait of Hormuz, ONLY if the oil is paid for in Chinese yuan - CNN
🔥14👎4😴3❤1
Signed Nihal
The US Dollar Index (DXY) has been rising sharply Primary Reasons for the Rally: 1. Safe-haven demand for the USD amid war risks 2. Surging oil prices hurt other currencies more than the US 3. Inflation fears → fewer Fed rate cuts expected Other Contributing Factors: - Broader risk aversion: Stock markets (S&P 500) have pulled back, amplifying dollar strength. - Minor tailwinds like US trade probes/tariff threat…
❤9💯1
Signed Nihal
BREAKING: Iran has given approval to the Indian government for two liquified petroleum tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz.
❤11👎4
Signed Nihal
🚨🇮🇷🇸🇦Just Now: Saudi Defence Ministry: Intercepted drone heading to Shaybah oilfield. Iran-backed drone threats continue to target key Gulf energy infrastructure.
🔥6❤1
Signed Nihal
News: Iran allows Indian oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. But: Iran sources deny any transit being allowed though Strait of Hormuz, when asked if Indian flagged ships are allowed
❤7🔥2
Signed Nihal
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @futuregenfinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 232,280 of 1,628,927entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FutureGen Finance” (@futuregenfinance), 14,423 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futuregenfinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.