Channel
@Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
218subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002602792481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 218 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 216 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 208 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 60 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "Tawḥīd (true belief in Allah's Oneness) becomes weakened when a servant abandons supplicating to his Lord, the Mighty and Majestic. And the less a person makes duʿāʾ (supplication), the less his heart becomes attached to Allah, the Mighty and Majestic." — Sharḥuṭ-Ṭaḥāwiyyah (Explanation of Aṭ-Ṭaḥāwiyyah) https://t.me/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English
📜 | Motivation and Aspiration 📂 | Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "If every day you study the tafsīr (explanation) of just one verse, one hadith along with its explanation, and one fiqh issue—only these three things each day— Then how much will you have accumulated in one year? The tafsīr of 360 verses. The explanation of 360 hadiths. 360 fiqh issues. Then imagine after five years or t…
📜 | Steadfastness Upon Righteousness 📂 | Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "Remaining steadfast upon righteousness is something precious and difficult to attain, for the heart is ever-changing. A person—even if he is a scholar, a student of knowledge, or a righteous individual—is not safe from trials. Nor is he guaranteed against a change in his heart or his deeds. Therefore, he should avoid …
🍃 Beware of reading horoscopes. 🌷 Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Āl al-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "Whoever reads the horoscope section, knowing the zodiac sign under which he was born, and reads what it says, then it is as though he has consulted a fortune-teller. His prayer will not be accepted for forty days. And if he believes what those horoscopes say, then he has disbelieved in what was revealed to Muḥammad ﷺ." Sour…
✍️ Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: A number of the scholars have said: "It is not permissible for a person to say, 'I seek refuge in Allah, then in you,' because seeking refuge (istiʿādhah) is an act of worship of the heart. This is the correct view. When someone says, 'I seek refuge in Allah, then in you,' seeking refuge is a purely inward act of the heart. Therefore, it is not appropriate…
Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "The greatest means by which you strive against the enemies of Allah, the Exalted and Majestic, and against Satan, is by spreading beneficial knowledge. So spread it wherever you can, according to your ability." Source: Al-Waṣāyā al-Jaliyyah, p. 46. t.me/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English
One of the reasons why people quit seeking knowledge is seeking a perfect teacher 🎙 Sheikh Sālih Aalush-Sheikh رحمه الله t.me/tullabilm26 t.me/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English
Collection of the Works of Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn ʿAbdil-ʿAzīz ibn Muḥammad Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) For anyone wishing to benefit from the Shaykh's writings on ʿAqīdah (Islamic creed), Hadith, Tafsir (Qur'anic exegesis), Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), and other Islamic sciences, this is a beneficial collection of his works. 📚 39 volumes (all in Arabic). 🔗 Download the books: https://drive.google.com/drive/f…
THE RIGHTS OF BROTHERHOOD By Ṣāliḥ Ālush-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) 1️⃣ The first right: To love your brother for the sake of Allah, not for any worldly interest. 2️⃣ The second right: To support your brother with your wealth and with your own efforts. 3️⃣ The third right: To safeguard your brother's honour. This includes: Remaining silent about his faults. Not probing him with excessive questioning. Prot…
BENEFIT: A Valuable Deduction on the Issue of Udhr bi Al-Jahl Shaykh Salih Aal Ash-Shaykh (may Allah preserve him) said: "The Prophet ﷺ was sent to all people. He said: 'No one from this Ummah who hears about me—whether Jew or Christian—and then does not believe in me, except that Allah will admit him to the Fire.' I heard Shaykh Muhammad Nasir ad-Din al-Albani explain this hadith in person. He said: 'The Prophe…
The benefit is partitioned: Everyone can't be a scholar 🎙 Sheikh Sālih Aalush-Sheikh رحمه الله t.me/tullabilm26
Burning beginning = Bright ending | Sheikh Sālih Aal-Sheikh حفظه الله https://t.me/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 567,191 of 1,570,256entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shaykh Sālih Ālush-Shaykh English Benefits.” (@Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English), 218 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sh_Soolih_AalushShaykh_English.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.