What is Namimah? Sheikh Daghash Al-Ajmi hafidhahullah states: It is passing information between people with the intention of causing corruption and discord between them. This is called forbidden tale-carrying. Passing information between people with what intention? The intention of causing discord. However, if someone passes information between people with the intention of reconciling them, this is good tale-carry…

Channel
Manhaj Benefits
@almanhajussalafi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,838subscribers
+233 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001542616834 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almanhajussalafi |
| Description | Necessary manhaj related benefits and clarifications |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almanhajussalafi |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:36 | 6,838 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:29 | 6,836 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 6,835 | +20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 6,815 | +16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 6,799 | +9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:28 | 6,790 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,784 | -3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 6,787 | +5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 6,782 | +21 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 6,761 | +15 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 6,746 | +46 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 6,700 | +16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 6,684 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 6,680 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 6,681 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 6,675 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 6,668 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 6,661 | +11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 6,650 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 6,646 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.0%
- avg views ÷ 6,838 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 891
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (2 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,821 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 265
- Videos
- 170
- Links
- 770
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 25m 25s
- Average length
- 2m 07s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (20.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
The Danger of Selective Screenshots: Why Context Matters! Imagine judging a person, labelling him a criminal, warning people against him and destroying his reputation based on a handful of WhatsApp Screenshots. You may never have seen the messages that came before them, the messages that followed them, or the messages that were deliberately deleted. A person can take a conversation, remove a few crucial sentences a…
YOUR TONE IS PART OF YOUR AKHLAQ (forwarded) You can speak the truth and still be gentle. You can correct someone without humiliating them. You can disagree without being disrespectful. And you can be firm without being harsh. Because being right does not give you the right to be cruel. Sometimes, we pay so much attention to what we say that we forget to consider how we say it. We say, "But I was telling the truth.…
✅ Salafiyyah encompasses knowledge and action. A person should strive to practise what he learns, improve his character and fulfil his obligations. ✅ Salafiyyah requires fairness and good manners. ❌ It is not a justification for oppression, arrogance, insults or unnecessary harshness. ✅ Salafiyyah involves distinguishing truth from error. ❌ It does not mean indiscriminately treating every disagreement as a reason…
What Is Salafiyyah? Salafiyyah is not simply a label, a group, a piece of clothing, a particular scholar, or a collection of opinions. It is a way of understanding and practising Islam based upon: 1) Qur’an, 2) authentic Sunnah, 3) according to the understanding of the Pious Predecessors (Salaf us-Saalih). We hope this post provides you with a clear and practical understanding of Salafiyyah. 1⃣. What Does 'Salafiy…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Freelancing Salafi - Pretence of Neutrality | Abu Fajr AbdulFattah bin Uthman
Should We Be Stern with Those who Take Pictures? | Abu Fajr AbdulFattaah Bin Uthman
Is the issue of Tasweer purely Fiqhi? | Sheikh Najeeb Ash-Shar’abi ḥafidhahullāh ---------------------------------------------- Sheikh Najeeb Ash-Shar’abi ḥafidhahullāh said (paraphrasing): The issue of Tasweer is tied to Aqeedah and not purely a Fiqhi issue based on two reasons: THE FIRST REASON: The first act of Shirk that took place on earth was because of two things: 1. Exaggeration with respect to the righteo…
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @almanhajussalafi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@masjidsahabah · 7,35310 postsAhlul-Khayr Productions
@AhlulKhayrProductions · 8224 postsMadrasatuna || مدرستنا
@madrasatunaa · 4,1232 postsTHE OFFICIAL ENGLISH CHANNEL OF SHAYKH ABEE ABDIRAHMAN RASHAD IBN AHMAD ADHAALI'EE
@rashadEng1 · 1,1262 postsThe Official English Channel for Shaykh Abū ʿAbdur-Raḥmān Yaḥyā ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥajūrī
@ShaykhYahyaEn · 3,2001 postAbraar Online Madressah
@abraarmadressah · 3641 posttullabilm26
@tullabilm26 · 61 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@masjidsahabah · 7,3536 postsTHE OFFICIAL ENGLISH CHANNEL OF SHAYKH ABEE ABDIRAHMAN RASHAD IBN AHMAD ADHAALI'EE
@rashadEng1 · 1,1262 postsقناة الشيخ رشاد الضالعي حفظه الله
@rshad11 · 10,4532 postsMadrasatuna || مدرستنا
@madrasatunaa · 4,1231 postThe Official English Channel for Shaykh Abū ʿAbdur-Raḥmān Yaḥyā ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥajūrī
@ShaykhYahyaEn · 3,2001 posttullabilm26
@tullabilm26 · 61 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BeneficialKnowledge · 26,540
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
@k2knyc · 21,172
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manhaj Benefits” (@almanhajussalafi), 6,838 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almanhajussalafi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.