Channel
@saalihsindi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
298subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003910934064 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saalihsindi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 22 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saalihsindi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 298 | +12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 286 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 285 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 285 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (22 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 964 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
48 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 48 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚 SUMMARY The Four Final Outcomes of the Muslims in the Hereafter 1. The Highest Rank: Those who enter Paradise immediately without any reckoning or punishment. They never enter the Fire and are the most honoured of the believers. 2. After an Easy Reckoning: Those who undergo a light and easy reckoning, after which they enter Paradise directly, without any punishment. 3. After Temporary Punishment: Those whose ev…
👍2
🔴 The conditions of the Muslims in the Hereafter fall into four categories; all of the final outcomes of the Muslims revolve around these four states: 📌 The First State: Those who enter Paradise without reckoning and without punishment—or, more precisely, those who enter Paradise immediately, without reckoning or punishment. By saying "enter Paradise immediately," we mean that they do not enter the Fire at all. Aft…
In summary, the conditions of the Muslims in the Hereafter revolve around these four final outcomes that we have mentioned. — End quote. Source: Explanation of ʿAqīdatus-Salaf wa Aṣḥābil-Ḥadīth by aṣ-Ṣābūnī, Lesson 25, by Shaykh Ṣāliḥ As-Sindī (may Allah preserve him). https://t.me/saalihsindi https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbD5OsZH5JM0pjH4H20s/115
SUMMARY How Does a Person Truly Submit to Allah? By Sheikh Sālih As-Sindī True submission (taslīm) is achieved by combining these five matters: 1. Believe the revelation completely – Accept everything Allah and His Messenger ﷺ have informed us of with certainty, without doubt, denial, or placing intellect above revelation. 2. Obey Allah's commands and avoid His prohibitions – Respond to every command with obedien…
👍5
🔴 How Does a Person Truly Submit (to Allah)? 📌 Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Sindī (may Allah preserve him) answered: "By combining five matters. This is an extremely important issue, my brothers! The greatest affliction in the Muslim world today is the weakness of true submission (taslīm). If you were to ask me, 'What disease is most widespread in the Ummah today?' I would answer with confidence: It is the deficiency of true submi…
The one who truly submits is the person for whom revelation always comes first, and everything else comes afterwards. Revelation is to be followed, while everything else follows it. When Allah speaks, or His Messenger ﷺ speaks, then no one's opinion, system, philosophy, or personal desire has any authority before it. Everything else is subordinate, and revelation must always be given precedence. There is no path to …
👍2
🔴Our Sheikh Sālih As-Sindī حفظه الله وبارك فيه said: "And I advise you, O seeker of knowledge, if you are truly eager to gain benefit and to thoroughly understand this issue—the issue of the disbelief (kufr) of the one who abandons the prayer (مسألة كفر تارك الصلاة)— then read the discussion on this subject in the book Taʿẓīm Qadriṣ-Ṣalāh - تعظيم قدر الصلاة (The Great Status of Prayer) by Imam Muḥammad ibn Naṣr Al-M…
👍5
The right of knowledge is greater than the right of the scholar 🎙 Sheikh Sālih As-Sindī حفظه الله t.me/tullabilm26 t.me/saalihsindi
👍4
What are the causes of the harm that befalls the strangers from Ahl al-Sunnah? Shaykh Ṣāliḥ Sindī (may Allah preserve him) said: "This harm has various causes: The first cause The stranger who firmly holds on to his tawḥīd (pure monotheism) and the Sunnah of his Prophet ﷺ experiences the loneliness of being a stranger. Strangeness carries with it a feeling of isolation, while human beings are social by nature. W…
👍6
🟧 [A Narration and Commentary]: 🔴 Imam Abu ʿUthmān aṣ-Ṣābūnī narrated with his chain of transmission from ʿAbdullāh ibn al-Mubārak that he said to a man who asked him about how the Lord descends: "When a hadith from the Messenger of Allah ﷺ reaches you, then submit to it." 📌 Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Sindī commented on this narration, saying: "This is a methodology. This narration is a school from which we learn the proper…
👍3
🔴 O seeker of knowledge! Occupy yourself with what benefits you. 📌 Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn ʿAbdil-ʿAzīz as-Sindī (may Allah preserve him) said: "A piece of advice for you, O seeker of knowledge—and those before you have already experienced this: your life is short, and time is even shorter than what would allow you to encompass all knowledge. So strive to attain that which will truly benefit you. Take this short path tha…
👍3
🔴 [The Creed of Ahlus-Sunnah Is One Throughout the Different Eras] 📌 Shaykh Ṣāliḥ ibn ʿAbdil-ʿAzīz as-Sindī (may Allah preserve him) said: "It is important for the student of knowledge to pay attention to something when studying the works of the early scholars. This treatise was written by Abū ʿUthmān aṣ-Ṣābūnī, who—as you heard—was born in 373 AH and died in 449 AH. Thus, he was one of the early scholars. This is …
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @saalihsindi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 606,427 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sheikh Sālih As-Sindi (English)” (@saalihsindi), 298 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saalihsindi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.