Channel
@SMpodcast
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
37,206subscribers
+863 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054276125 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SMpodcast |
| Description | телеграм-канал подкаста ведет Анжелиа Ильина https://youtube.com/@ilinaanzhela 🗯️ Бот для анонимных вопросов t.me/questianonbot?start=91995877b ✔️ по всем вопросам пишите на почту [email protected] номер заявления в РКН № 7181096685 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SMpodcast |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 37,206 | +87 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 37,119 | +43 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 37,076 | +24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 37,052 | +21 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 37,031 | +38 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 36,993 | +23 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 36,970 | +112 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 36,858 | +47 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 36,811 | +13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:53 | 36,798 | +22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:04 | 36,776 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 36,770 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 36,763 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 36,759 | +12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 36,747 | -5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 36,752 | +33 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 36,719 | +55 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 36,664 | +10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 36,654 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 36,653 | first reading |
157 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 69 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 157 (31 July 2026 – 29 September 2026) |
| Views total | 281,915 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 16:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @SMpodcast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 157 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| S4Ssbqz46bmw6PNQuF4zJu5YVtnBWnWCMqEHzCTYCB2vUP2hrMaVb8 | 1 | 31 July 2026 | 31 July 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
📨 Получено сообщение! Вопрос к мужчинам: Считается, что если женщина пользуется большой популярностью у мужчин, это определяет её как «трофейную» за которой нужно ухаживать и стоять в очереди. А та, которая и внешне и интеллектуально хороша, но более сдержанная, строже в начале и не собирает вокруг себя хороводы - не вызывает такого интереса у противоположного пола. Пожалуйста поделитесь, Вашим мнением, так ли это…
Photo, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Окей в дружбу между М и Ж мы дружно не верим) Продолжите тогда фразу: Если женщина дружит с мужчиной – это френдзона, а если мужчина дружит с женщиной – это …
Верите в дружбу между М и Ж?👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📨 Получено сообщение! как вы относитесь к дружбе между мужчиной и женщиной, когда кто-то из или оба в отношениях? и лично мне интересно, девочки, а как вы относились к подругам своего мужчины, если таковые были? и мужчины, а как вы относитесь на самом деле к своим подругам? допускаете это общение будучи в отношениях? знакомите со своей второй половинкой?
Важный вопрос: где найти лишних 5 часов, чтобы просмотреть всю эпопею Самойлова/Собчак?👀
Обязательно посмотрите, чтобы начать новую жизнь с понедельника 💫
▶️ Дайте мне 24 часа — и я покажу, как запустить изменения в жизни А что, если ваша жизнь не меняется не потому, что вы мало стараетесь — а потому что ваш мозг буквально сопротивляется изменениям? Вы можете годами хотеть больше денег, новых отношений, другую работу, новую жизнь. Смотреть подкасты, ходить в терапию, всё понимать головой — и снова оказываться в той же точке. Потому что мозгу, по большому счёту, всё …
📨 Получено сообщение! Мужчины, вопрос тем, кто общается в течение 3-6 мес онлайн с девушкой, и вы пока не можете встретиться вживую. Как часто вы общаетесь по видео или звонками, или переписка преобладает? Если девушка вам действительна важна, дарите ли вы подарки, и вообще какие знаки внимания оказываете? Хочется понять, что норма для большинства мужчин.
Девчат, готовы финансово содержать своего мужчину?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 157 posts we hold for @SMpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@SMpodcast edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Верите в дружбу между М и Ж?👀
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Девчат, готовы финансово содержать своего мужчину?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Я выберу…
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Рассказали бы жене, что ее муж изменяет?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 157 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“партия любви” (@SMpodcast), 37,206 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SMpodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.