Channel
@SERVIAMIWILLSERVE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,238subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001423067064 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SERVIAMIWILLSERVE |
| Created | 9 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SERVIAMIWILLSERVE |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 1,238 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,235 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 1,239 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 1,240 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 1,240 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,526 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
44 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 19 | 43.2% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 15.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 🤬 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 6.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Part 2 of my series on Dei Verbum: shorturl.at/Bs1Du This article covers the teachings of the Popes and Doctors on Scripture's historical and scientific inerrancy, and how the Modernists at Vatican II vocally rejected those teachings during the Council. Part 3 will examine how this rejection shaped the final text of the Council's declaration on Scripture.
❤1
https://youtu.be/2l5lrB4Bn9E
🔥2
For the SoUrCe Bros
Extraits de La Croix Gammée, ce qu’elle représente (1933) Devant l’assaut des Juifs contre les races blanches ou Japhétiques (issues de Japhet), celles-ci tendent à graduellement se liguer dans un vaste mouvement défensif. Ce n’est pas par suite de propagande allemande, mais parce que tous ont conscience de la même attaque et ressentent le même danger, que tous les pays tendent simultanément vers un antisémitisme pr…
Excerpts from The Swamp Cross, what it represents (1933) Faced with the assault of the Jews against the white or Japhetic races (from Japheth), they tended to gradually band together in a vast defensive movement. It is not as a result of German propaganda, but because everyone is aware of the same attack and feels the same danger, that all countries tend simultaneously towards protective anti-Semitism; it is because…
❤3
You should watch this one. https://youtu.be/r77366-ea08
👍2
https://thedailyfightofficial.substack.com/p/the-church-of-machiavelli-power-pretense
As regards the body, Adam indeed was produced from the clay, while Eve came forth from Adam's rib. Yet in neither case was there any seminal power capable of forming the human body. Rather, this formation took place not through any transformation or successive motion, as the generation of bodies ordinarily does, but instantaneously and by the sovereign command of God alone, which is characteristic of creation. - Rev.…
❤🔥3🔥1
https://thedailyfightofficial.substack.com/p/the-church-of-machiavelli-power-pretense
In the so-called “Hidden Encyclical” of Pope Pius XI, Humani Generis Unitas, recommendations on race relations were given in the 130th paragraph. Though not magisterial, the document provides insight into the mind of the August Pontiff and the theologians he entrusted to the matter, specifically the American Jesuit theologian Father John Lafarge. Concerning racial intermarriage, a stigma was not only acknowledged b…
❤3
Guys, I'm in the emergency room now. I have a ruptured appendix they're going to take out. They're prepping the room for surgery now Pray for me please I'll set up a fundraiser later. I'll seriously need help with this
🙏8
Update: Okay so what they're going to do is either tonight or tomorrow morning drain the abscess and keep me here for a few days. Then when the body is healed up enough in 6 to 8 weeks they'll remove it
🙏11
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @SERVIAMIWILLSERVE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 270,625 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SERVIAM- I Will Serve” (@SERVIAMIWILLSERVE), 1,238 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SERVIAMIWILLSERVE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.