11 Jun 2026, 12:46 UTC231 viewsread 6 August 2026
https://gofund.me/8680166ca
Channel
BELLUM CONTRA HÆRÉTICOS
@Catholicismus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
891subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001177122770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Catholicismus |
| Created | 8 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Catholicismus |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 891 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 895 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 895 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
19 May 2025, 20:47 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
9 May 2025, 13:16 UTC954 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wmreview
Card. Prevost elected by conclave as Leo XIV—Who is he? Leo XIV, Cardinal Prevost, has been elected by the Conclave. He is thus a true successor of Paul VI: but is he a successor of St Peter? https://www.wmreview.org/p/leo-xiv-prevost
9 May 2025, 13:12 UTC749 viewsread 6 August 2026
Some info on 'Leo XIV' https://novusordowatch.org/2025/05/habent-papam-new-pope-leo-14/
8 May 2025, 17:48 UTC726 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo
Non habemus papam.
8 May 2025, 17:45 UTC440 viewsread 6 August 2026
https://collegeofcardinalsreport.com/cardinals/robert-francis-prevost/ —> pro-Amoris Laetitia but apparently a little less pro-LGBT than Francis. Cards close to his chest regarding the traditional Mass and blessing sodomitical unions https://www.thetablet.co.uk/features/next-pope-papabile/ —> directed removal of Bp Strickland Also head of Augustianians and prefect of dicastery for bishops General profile: https://…
8 May 2025, 17:45 UTC454 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SERVIAMIWILLSERVE
He's a "moderate" now, since Francis destroyed so much. He would have been a heretic in the 50s, and burnt at the stake in the Middle Ages.
7 May 2025, 18:27 UTC739 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll
What name will the next papal claimant take?
- Francis II16%
- Benedict XVII3%
- John Paul III15%
- Paul VII2%
- John XXIV1%
- Pius XIII19%
- Leo XIV8%
- Gregory XVII8%
- Clement XV2%
- Other25%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
7 May 2025, 17:06 UTC523 viewsread 6 August 2026
Not one man currently in the Sistine Chapel is a real cardinal. This is, therefore, an illegitimate election. It is possible, however, that by a miracle of God's infinite mercy, a real Catholic could somehow receive the requisite two thirds of votes and be elected, and his subsequent recognition by the virtual unanimity of the Church would legitimize his elevation to the Papacy. (That's without thinking of the Cassi…
21 Apr 2025, 23:52 UTC432 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wmreview
Francis is dead, RIP Jorge Mario Bergoglio, whom many know as 'Pope Francis,' has gone to his reward. What next? https://www.wmreview.org/p/francis-is-dead-rip
21 Apr 2025, 23:52 UTC537 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wmreview
Cue jokes: "We're all sedevacantists now." How funny. But no, "we're" not. Sedevacantism is predicated not just on a vacant see, but the Church's teaching on the papacy and her own constitution. Many who are chortling about how "we're sedevacantists now" will accept whoever's elected—even Pope Susan: https://www.wmreview.org/p/susanvacantism
21 Apr 2025, 09:01 UTC685 viewsread 6 August 2026
Jorge Mario Bergoglio has died. He showed the Catholic world the poisonous fruits of Vatican II in an obvious fashion leading to a surge of Catholics to seek out more traditional groups and forms of worship to reject the Modernist's concoctions. So much so, that towards the latter years of his papacy, he attempted to suppress various indult groups and TLM associations. However, his attempts merely managed to foster …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Catholicismus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
7 May 2025, 18:27 UTCFinal Results88 voters
What name will the next papal claimant take?
- Francis II16%
- Benedict XVII3%
- John Paul III15%
- Paul VII2%
- John XXIV1%
- Pius XIII19%
- Leo XIV8%
- Gregory XVII8%
- Clement XV2%
- Other25%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2025 to 11 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,428,809 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BELLUM CONTRA HÆRÉTICOS” (@Catholicismus), 891 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Catholicismus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.