Channel
@AmericanReform
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,130subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002308950325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AmericanReform |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AmericanReform |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 1,130 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:40 | 1,131 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 1,128 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 | 1,128 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (22 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,864 |
| Reactions total | 209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
209 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75 | 35.9% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 12.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 19 | 9.09% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 7.18% | |
| 🤮 | 10 | 4.78% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 2.87% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 2.87% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.87% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Letter from Fr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange to Fr. Mariano Cordovani, concerning Jacques Maritain and his sympathies for the Republican Spanish forces during the civil war: “Maritain, despite my advice, dwells too much in this preface on the faults of Spanish Catholics before this civil war — faults that produced the people’s discontent. He does not see clearly enough that this discontent was exploited by the Russian…
👍3
“For the unity of the Faith can no longer be safeguarded if the Sovereign Pontiff — that is, the Pontiff who by right is sovereign — renounces the exercise of the primacy of jurisdiction; this, we are unfortunately in a position to observe. More radically still, it is the very possibility of Faith, and not only its unity, that finds itself annihilated by schism — that is to say, by the fact of not being ‘one’ with th…
👍9
In the so-called “Hidden Encyclical” of Pope Pius XI, Humani Generis Unitas, recommendations on race relations were given in the 130th paragraph. Though not magisterial, the document provides insight into the mind of the August Pontiff and the theologians he entrusted to the matter, specifically the American Jesuit theologian Father John Lafarge. Concerning racial intermarriage, a stigma was not only acknowledged b…
👍16💯7❤2
On December 30, 1993 the Fundamental Agreement between the Vatican and ‘State of Israel’ was signed into law. John Paul II approved of this historic treaty, whose contents and significance will briefly be analyzed. One year later on September 29, John Paul II said he hoped “the unique and sacred character of this Holy City will receive international guarantees that will also ensure its access to all believers”, drea…
🤮10🌚2🥴2😡1
It’s time for American Catholics to have a frank discussion about race and its importance to this race, including why mass immigration poses an existential threat to our country. “The ‘Code of International Ethics,’ published in 1938, by the Catholic ‘International Union of Social Studies,’ says when dealing with the subject of migration that an individual country is justified in excluding foreign peoples of a lower…
💯13🔥4👍1
The problem with this counterargument is that it reduces the whole issue into merely being able to criticize the Israeli government — nothing more. If it even needed to be said, the fundamental problem with Jews in America is not Benjamin Netanyahu, his government or even the unjust war and wicked destruction of Arabs in the Middle East. The real and fundamental problem is the Jewish Synagogue itself, i.e. financia…
🔥10👏3
Fr. Domenico Palmieri, S.J., on union with the Holy See during a vacancy “Why then is the See said to remain when the Seated has died? I answer that the See indeed remains, but vacant; and this formula signifies precisely this, namely, that the subject of the authority of the See is lacking. What therefore remains? There remains the Apostolic authority: 1. First, in its effect, that is, there remains the efficacy o…
❤🔥6👍4👏2
Establishment Republican politicians will go around talking to “Black community leaders”, which makes sense and is the natural thing to do. But have you ever heard them mention meeting “White community leaders”, much less in a positive way? Everyone should ask himself: why does individualism conspicuously only apply to us? X 🔗
💯13⚡2❤2👏1
The older generations are going about combatting Socialism in all the wrong ways. For them, the answer is and always has been laissez faire Capitalism, ironically the very system that produces Socialism. — Socialism, a revolutionary movement identified by two main markers: ruthless class warfare and the abolition of private property. The best and only solution is to provide a true alternative to both laissez faire …
👍18❤6💯4👎1
A short thread on the Dreher x Boreing interview🧵 Dreher is smart, intuitive and knows the current battle in the Republican Party is absolutely existential for his camp. For the old guard of American Conservatives, it is essential that the status quo continue, not merely the last 80 years as some may think, but actually 250 years. American Conservatives, himself included, are those who take issue only with the exce…
👌6❤2👍1🔥1
In 1919, Fr. Gallus Maria Manser outlined the pernicious effects of revolutionary efforts to effect female political and civil equality: “And indeed, much can be said for these worthy working women, who have often been true heroines of faith and virtue even before. But heroic lineages generally do not last many decades, and heroic deeds can be expected of individuals, not of the general public. Once introduced, howe…
❤🔥13🔥5❤3💯2
My latest at Integrity Magazine — Franciscan announces first ‘Coalition of Catholics Against Antisemitism’ chapter. 'Kosher Catholicism’ continues to make inroads at influential Catholic universities in the US.' https://integritymagazine.org/2026/07/24/franciscan-announces-first-coalition-of-catholics-against-antisemitism-chapter/
👍11🌚4🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @AmericanReform. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 429,487 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“American Reform” (@AmericanReform), 1,130 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmericanReform.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.