Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Gramip Channel

@Gramip

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,828subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001387848321
TypeChannel
Username@Gramip
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gramip

Growth

1,8281,8351,831.56 August 2026 — 1,835 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,835 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,831 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,827–1,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:541,828-3
9 Aug 2026, 20:311,831-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,835no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:021,835first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 16 September 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1650.0%
🤮721.9%
🤔39.38%
💩26.25%
😁26.25%
13.13%
😱13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2022 to 24 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Dec 2022, 13:41 UTC≈19,100 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

各位“阳”了没?

  1. 正阳。阳ing31%
  2. 阳过39%
  3. 没阳31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

28 Nov 2022, 03:16 UTC≈6,610 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @QMGZ2018Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍7

15 Nov 2022, 19:33 UTC≈13,800 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

今届FIFA世界杯冠军谁属?

  1. 巴西25%
  2. 阿根廷16%
  3. 英格兰9%
  4. 德国13%
  5. 法国6%
  6. 西班牙5%
  7. 葡萄牙5%
  8. 荷兰4%
  9. 比利时4%
  10. 其他12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Nov 2022, 13:43 UTC≈3,400 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @GXWnews

馮小剛之潤 https://rfi.my/8syk

24 Oct 2022, 16:57 UTC≈3,730 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

美國媒體的中共政治局常委名單競猜遊戲 https://rfi.my/8qb7

😁1

13 Oct 2022, 10:46 UTCviews —

Gramip Channel pinned «中共二十大后,清零的防疫政策在多长时间内仍将持续?»

28 Sept 2022, 06:34 UTC≈9,530 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

谁将跻身新一届中共政治局常委?[可多选]

  1. 胡春华53%
  2. 丁薛祥32%
  3. 李强34%
  4. 陈敏尔24%
  5. 蔡奇21%
  6. 李鸿忠11%
  7. 李希13%
  8. 陈全国12%
  9. 黄坤明10%
  10. 其它。留言补充17%

The shares total 227%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤮7👍4💩2

24 Sept 2022, 17:06 UTC≈8,100 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

[听床•问卷]中共的老人帮是否仍然能够有效干预朝政?

  1. 31%
  2. 不能43%
  3. 不好说26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Gramip. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2022, 13:41 UTCFinal Results2,000 voters approx.

各位“阳”了没?

  1. 正阳。阳ing31%
  2. 阳过39%
  3. 没阳31%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Nov 2022, 19:33 UTCFinal Results1,000 voters approx.

今届FIFA世界杯冠军谁属?

  1. 巴西25%
  2. 阿根廷16%
  3. 英格兰9%
  4. 德国13%
  5. 法国6%
  6. 西班牙5%
  7. 葡萄牙5%
  8. 荷兰4%
  9. 比利时4%
  10. 其他12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2022, 06:34 UTCFinal Results500 voters

谁将跻身新一届中共政治局常委?[可多选]

  1. 胡春华53%
  2. 丁薛祥32%
  3. 李强34%
  4. 陈敏尔24%
  5. 蔡奇21%
  6. 李鸿忠11%
  7. 李希13%
  8. 陈全国12%
  9. 黄坤明10%
  10. 其它。留言补充17%

The shares total 227%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Sept 2022, 17:06 UTCFinal Results513 voters

[听床•问卷]中共的老人帮是否仍然能够有效干预朝政?

  1. 31%
  2. 不能43%
  3. 不好说26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2022, 18:20 UTCFinal Results800 voters

中共二十大,习近平将陆续担任哪些职位?(可多选)

  1. 中共中央总书记70%
  2. 国家主席68%
  3. 中央军委主席67%
  4. 中共中央委员会主席(恢复设立)43%
  5. 国务院总理23%
  6. 国家副主席19%
  7. 任职其它。请留言补充12%
  8. 裸退。不再任职21%

The shares total 323%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Sept 2022, 17:33 UTCAnonymous Poll497 voters

普京升级战事发布动员令,您是否认为当今世界的核威胁增大?

  1. 在很大程度上增大42%
  2. 在一定程度上增大23%
  3. 基本没有增大16%
  4. 根本没有增大19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2022 to 24 December 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 952,339 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gramip Channel” (@Gramip), 1,828 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gramip.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.