Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Bestflipper

@flipperfox

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,406subscribers

-48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002041695164
TypeChannel
Username@flipperfox
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/flipperfox

Growth

4,4064,4544,4306 August 2026 — 4,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,454 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,425 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,406 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,399–4,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:044,406-19
9 Aug 2026, 13:114,425-25
6 Aug 2026, 23:214,450-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:034,454no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:044,454first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 4,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,479
Reactions total465
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 532588032889455453413233.2%
7017.6%
👍5012.6%
🔥4912.3%
😁4210.6%
🌚379.32%
😭174.28%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 18 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @flipperfox. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC131 views25 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Редкие номера подарков предположительно бронировались для «своих». 🟡Расследование о кумовстве, опубликовали Gift Updates. Номера вида #XXXX #XXXXY #YXXXX подозрительным образом дропались некой Тане, жене разраба телеграм.🌚 🟡UPD Дополнение из другого канала. @flipperfox

🌚9custom 53258803288945545349😁7

6 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC146 views28 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ручки торгуются в -72% в долларах от цены первички. 🌚 🟡Текущая ситуация по гифтам: 1) Зачем покупали вообще?.. 2) Черный фон и ничего больше! 3) Если долго смотреть на гифт, то все станет монохромом.. 👀 Честно стыбрила вдохновилась у @spylc ❤ @flipperfox

😁14custom 532588032889455453494🌚1

6 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC148 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😁10custom 53258803288945545348🌚6😭1

6 Aug 2026, 04:54 UTC142 views22 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

Вышло новое улучшение на гифты Ночью к ревилу стали доступны ручки. 📝 Себестоимость подарка - 2500 звезд, а минимальная цена улучшения - 250 звезд, и будет доступна в 13:15 по МСК! Модельки получились симпатичные, но на текущем рынке, полагаю, в плюс пойдут только рарки и блеки. 🤔 @flipperfox

👍107custom 53258803288945545345

5 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC150 views26 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

xGift закрывает маркет К сожалению проект не окупал себя, поэтому наработки, а так же все подарки переедут в Gates Market, а вот балансы необходимо вывести до 31 августа! 🔍 Заглянула я на новую площадку, пока там довольно пусто и уныло. Видимо, движ начнется уже после миграции гифтов с релеера хГифта. Из хороших новостей - на нашего иранского друга напала фея продуктивности и он постоянно выпускает обновления Тонн

custom 532588032889455453410🌚7🔥54

4 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC162 views34 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отпускной оффтоп Вообще все слегка спонтанно получилось, но лучшие в жизни вещи - они такие! 😄 Питер я люблю (но только в хорошую погоду, так что привезла ее туда с собой!🌚)! Хотелось посмотреть и новые места, и погулять по центру. В музеи и дворцы не тянуло, зато тянуло в одну лютеранскую церковь - Анненкирхе. Я когда-то увидела фото, и решила: «мне это надо!» Первое здание было деревянным, его построили в 1704

custom 53258803288945545341312🔥7🌚1👍1

4 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTC134 views18 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Telegram снова доступен в App Store 🥔

6🔥6custom 53258803288945545346

4 Aug 2026, 02:09 UTC151 views16 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

Телеграм недоступен в App Store При чем приложение исчезло все всех странах. @telelakel обратился в поддержку Apple с даным вопросом: По словам представителя службы поддержки, Telegram все еще присутствует во внутренних системах Apple и не помечен как удаленное приложение. Они предположили, что приложение могло быть временно скрыто разработчиком, поскольку оно все еще существует в инфраструктуре Apple. Обстановка

custom 53258803288945545346👍5😭5

3 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC162 views29 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ушла в лисий загул 🦊 Вчера вернулась из отпуска, и уже сегодня первый рабочий день. Так уж вышло, что весь отдых я честно халявила в блоге, и делала только репосты основных новостей. Спасибо за понимание и активность в чате! ❤ Начать писать после перерыва как-то сложно, прокрастинировала пол дня! Планирую написать небольшой оффтоп про отпуск! По крипте - вот эта лудка отдала мне гифт. Крутила фришки, потом с нако

10custom 53258803288945545349🔥8🌚1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC128 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @primateimpact

Обновление информации по подаркам Intelligence Cups для 240 победителей Олимпиады: — Принять участие в Олимпиаде сейчас уже нельзя. Можно подать заявку на 2027 год. — Презентация этих призов состоялась на форуме IOAI 2026 в Астане. — Победители получат одинаковый Телеграм Подарок "Intelligence Cup", который можно улучшить в случайную модель: золото, серебро или бронза. — Каждой модели обещают гарантированный байбек

custom 532588032889455453486👍5

3 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC136 views26 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026

• Ночью друг Дурова опубликовал "🏆". Обычно такие сообщения означают выпуск скинов/моделей/улучшений на этот Телеграм Подарок. Но здесь ситуация немного другая. Не покупайте обыкновенные кубки 🏆 за 100⭐️, их нельзя будет улучшить! • Павел Дуров анонсировал призы на Олимпиаду по Искусственному Интеллекту. Призами для победителей будут как раз кубки, для которых сделают пару новых моделей, и которые видимо можно буде

custom 532588032889455453411🔥7👍62

30 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC249 views28 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🌚9custom 53258803288945545349😁6😭4

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @flipperfox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 510,907 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bestflipper” (@flipperfox), 4,406 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flipperfox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.