𝕀𝔽 𝕋ℍ𝔼 𝕊ℙ𝔼ℂ𝕀𝔸𝕃𝕀𝕊𝕋 ℙ𝕆𝕊𝕋 𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝕎𝕀𝕃𝕃 𝕊𝕌ℝ𝔼𝕃𝕐 𝕎𝕀ℕ

Channel
THE SPECIALIST
@besttipsincricket
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,601subscribers
-2,266 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001244757463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @besttipsincricket |
| Description | 𝙁𝙍𝙀𝙀 𝙏𝙊𝙎𝙎/𝙈𝘼𝙏𝘾𝙃 𝙏𝙄𝙋𝙎👇 https://t.me/+8Tqh1xFXoHExYTY1 Predictions only |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/besttipsincricket |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 19,601 | -470 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 20,071 | -357 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 20,428 | -344 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 20,772 | -354 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 21,126 | -475 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 21,601 | -166 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 21,767 | -100 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 21,867 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.7%
- avg views ÷ 19,601 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,030
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 29
- of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (22 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140,940 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 58
- Videos
- 43
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 34s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
𝕄𝔸ℕℂℍ𝔼𝕊𝕋𝔼ℝ 𝕎𝕀𝕃 𝕎𝕀ℕ 𝕆ℝ ℂ𝕆𝕄𝔼 25ℙ 𝔸 𝕊ℙ𝔼ℂ𝕀𝔸𝕃 𝕄𝔸𝕋ℂℍ
𝑭𝑶𝑹 𝑩𝑨𝑪𝑲 𝑩𝑬 𝑭𝑰𝑻 𝑨𝑵𝑫 𝑮𝑬𝑻 𝑹𝑬𝑨𝑫𝒀 𝑻𝑶 𝑮𝑶
Video, posted without a caption
𝕀𝔽 𝕋ℍ𝔼 𝕊ℙ𝔼ℂ𝕀𝔸𝕃𝕀𝕊𝕋 ℙ𝕆𝕊𝕋 𝕐𝕆𝕌 𝕎𝕀𝕃𝕃 𝕊𝕌ℝ𝔼𝕃𝕐 𝕎𝕀ℕ
𝕄𝔸ℕℂℍ𝔼𝕊𝕋𝔼ℝ 𝕎𝕀𝕃 𝕎𝕀ℕ 𝕆ℝ ℂ𝕆𝕄𝔼 25ℙ 𝔸 𝕊ℙ𝔼ℂ𝕀𝔸𝕃 𝕄𝔸𝕋ℂℍ
Har Books leave karke next 2-3 mahine mein sabhi Telegram Punters yehi aayenge 𝐫𝐮𝐝𝐫𝐚 pe Kuch jaldi aayenge ....kuch dusri jagah se dhokha kha ke aayenge. Time To Shift To 𝐑𝐔𝐃𝐑𝐀 𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗘𝗥 𝟱% 𝗕𝗢𝗡𝗨𝗦 𝗢𝗡 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬 𝗗𝗘𝗣𝗢𝗦𝗜𝗧😍🔥 𝘾𝙝𝙤𝙩𝙖/ 𝘽𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙋𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 / 𝘽𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙈𝙖𝙣 𝙎𝙖𝙗 𝘿𝙚𝙚𝙬𝙖𝙣𝙖 𝙃𝙖𝙞 𝐑𝐔𝐃𝐑𝐀 𝗘𝘅𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸 𝙠e *5%🄴🅇🄲🄻🅄🅂🄸🅅🄴 🄱🄾🄽🅄🅂 🄾🄽 🄽🄴🅆 🄸🄳🅂* https://wa.link/75390v https://wa.link/75390v https://signal.me/#eu/iL50JFWGgZSlsI4C
𝕊𝕆𝕌𝕋ℍ𝔼ℝℕ 𝔹ℝ𝔸𝕍𝔼 𝕎𝕀𝕃𝕃 𝕎𝕀ℕ 𝕆ℝ ℂ𝕆𝕄𝔼 23𝕡 𝔸 𝕊ℙ𝔼ℂ𝕀𝔸𝕃 𝕄𝔸𝕋ℂℍ
𝕟𝕠𝕟 𝕔𝕦𝕥𝕥𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝕨𝕠𝕟 𝕪𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝕕𝕒𝕪
𝕤𝕦𝕟𝕣𝕚𝕤𝕖𝕣𝕤 𝕝𝕖𝕖𝕕𝕤 𝕨in 𝕤𝕡𝕖𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝 𝕞𝕒𝕥𝕔𝕙 Non cutting match Back any rate
Photo, posted without a caption
40p 𝕄𝕀 𝕃𝕆ℕ𝔻𝕆ℕ 𝕎𝔸𝕋 𝔸 𝕁𝔸ℂ𝕂ℙ𝕆𝕋
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @besttipsincricket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iamvsg · 1,284,187
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 8 August 2026
@vsgline2 · 141,755
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 13 August 2026
@RANBIRROYOFFICE · 2,118,568
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 8 August 2026
@Ranbirroydubai · 1,164,259
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 8 August 2026
@harshalmsd07 · 115,958
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 August 2026
@VSRPOWERR · 122,923
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“THE SPECIALIST” (@besttipsincricket), 19,601 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/besttipsincricket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.