3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 805–807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 15:38
807
+2
6 Aug 2026, 15:22
805
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:28
805
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.9%
avg views ÷ 807 subscribers
Avg views / post
645
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.928%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held
20 (1 July 2026 – 30 July 2026)
Views total
5,801
Reactions total
51
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
40
56.3%
❤
17
23.9%
👏
12
16.9%
👎
1
1.41%
🙏
1
1.41%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
متأسفانه جنگ ایران و امریکا به سرعت در حال فرامنطقهای شدن است!
رحیم محمدی
۸ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
حمله به یک کشتی ایرانی در دریای خزر و خط لوله شرق به غرب خزر، فعّال شدن جبهه یمن علیه زیرساختهای نفتی عربستان و دریای سرخ و باب المندب، ورود عراق به صحنه درگیری و حملات مشترک امریکا و عربستان به نیروهای ایرانی - عراقی در عراق، حمله پهپادی به یک کشتی در بندر دمیاط مصر، مشروط کردن کمک تسلیحاتی امریکا به اوکراین در قبال کمک اروپ…
سکولاریسم چیست؟
و آیا خاستگاه سکولاریسم دین است؟ یا انسان؟
رحیم محمدی
۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
از زمانی که پدیدهی اصطلاحاً "روشنفکری دینی" یا دیناندیشی جدید پیدا شده است و تفسیری تازه از دین و مذهب ارائه کرده است که از تفسیر و بیان روحانیت و حوزهی علمیه متفاوت است، اغلب روشنفکران دینی سخنانی به این مضمون هم گفتهاند که اسلام سکولاریسم ندارد یا گفتهاند سکولاریسم از ویژگیهای مسیحیّت است. حالا پرسش این است: آیا سکولاریسم چ…
از شکوه اندیشه تا ابتذال زبان
عبدالکریم سروش، خواه موافق او باشیم یا مخالف، یکی از اثرگذارترین چهرههای سپهر اندیشهی ایران در چهار دههی گذشته است. نسلی از ایرانیان با آثار او جرئت پرسیدن یافتند، بسیاری از مسلمات را دوباره به محک نقد زدند و با مفاهیمی چون قبض و بسط شریعت، تکثر قرائتهای دینی، تمایز دین و معرفت دینی و ضرورت گفتوگوی انتقادی آشنا شدند. سهم تاریخی سروش در گشودن افقهای تازه در روشنفکری دینی را نه میت…
گاهی چنین به ذهن من میرسد، آقای دکتر عبدالکریم سروش استاد سابق ما که کارهایش را کرده و "تفرج صنع" را به پایان برده و "فلسفهی علوم اجتماعی" را طی کرده و "ایدئولوژی شیطانی" را آزموده، در سر پیری و در اوان کهنسالی به ایمان و معرفت عنفوان جوانی رجعت نموده و در خانقاه صوفیان مولوی آرمیده و "بازگشت به خویشتن" را میآزماید و از تهور و گستاخی که در میانسالی بر آستان دین و دولت و سنت ورزیده بود، پشیمان گشته است و این رو…
باز هم شریعتی
رحیم محمدی
۱ مرداد ۱۴۰۵
اخیراً دکتر موسی غنینژاد در مصاحبهای یکی دیگر از ابتکارات دکتر شریعتی را یادآوری کرد و "شخصیت وهمی شاندل" را که از زبان او به مخاطبین خود تعالیمی آموخته بود به یادها آورد و صریحاً او را "شیّاد" با یای مشدد نامید.
البته کار دکتر غنینژاد مسلماً مناسب نبود حتی من هم که منتقد شریعتی و آلاحمد و فردید و داوری و نخشب و مطهری و نصر و بقیهی شان هستم، از شنیدن این حرف ناراحت شدم.…
✉️⭕️دعوتنامه برای حضور عموم علاقمندان در آیین نکوداشت استاد اسمعیل خلیلی
❇انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران، با همکاری جمعی از نهادها و انجمنهای علمی، به پاس سالها خدمات ارزشمند علمی، پژوهشی و آموزشی، #آیین_نکوداشت_اسمعیل_خلیلی؛ پژوهشگر، اندیشمند برجسته و عضو ادوار هیأتمدیره انجمن جامعهشناسی ایران را برگزار میکند.
✨ در این مراسم، جمعی از استادان، پژوهشگران، دانشجویان، همکاران، اعضای خانواده و علاقهمندان، با پاسداشت سال…
آیا نهیلیسم ممکن است؟
اخیراً یک سخنرانی از دکتر حاتم قادری به دستم رسید، پس از آنکه آن را گوش دادم، متوجه شدم ایشان نیز به تبع روشنفکرانِ دینی و روشنفکرانِ چپ دهههای ۴۰ و ۵۰ دوباره برچسب "نهیلیسم" را بر جامعهی جدید ایران یا به طور کلی "مدرنیته" چسبانده است.
در فایل صوتی بالا اندکی در مورد ادعا و برچسب ایشان بحث کردهام و در مورد پرسشی که در بالا طرح کردهام توضیح دادهام.
رحیم محمدی
۲۸ تیر ۱۴۰۵
#نهیلیسم
سلام آقای دکتر سعیدی عزیز
از حوصله و دقت شما در تدقیق بحث نقد کمال تشکر را دارم، خیلی آموزنده است و امیدوارم همینطور هم باشد و ماها را به فکر فرو ببرد.
به نظرم آمد یادآوری کنم مفهوم با اهمیت "انسانِ دانشگاهی" پییر بوردیو را.
گویا دانشگاههای ما هنوز نمیتوانند انسان دانشگاهی تربیت کنند و در بهترین حالت بیشتر کنشگر سیاسی و کنشگر مدنی و روشنفکر (حالا به معنای چپ و راست و دینی) تربیت میکنند. متأسفانه حتی دانشگاهها…
من هم در مورد مطلب ایشان پاسخ ذیل را نوشتم.
محمدی
👇👇
Signed رحیم محمدی
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RahimMohamadi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 658,913 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جامعه ایرانی” (@RahimMohamadi), 807 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RahimMohamadi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
