Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Radio MGtow

@RadioMGtow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

204subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002041782539
TypeChannel
Username@RadioMGtow
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RadioMGtow

Growth

204207205.56 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 207 subscribers15 August 2026 — 204 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 204–207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:26204-3
7 Aug 2026, 03:47207no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:16207first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13970.9%
3819.4%
👏126.12%
🤬42.04%
🔥21.02%
😢10.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Dec 2025, 11:05 UTC≈6,300 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🔹️در دهه اخیر تعداد مردانی که ازدواج رو از گزینه های زندگی دور انداختند به طور چشمگیری زیاد شده و زنان که از مجموعه عوامل مهم آن بودند، از این موضوع احساس نگرانی میکنند، اما اینها باعث برگشتن ازدواج به انتخاب های این مردان نمی‌شه. چون زنان با رفتار های شرودینگر مانند خویش، ناخواسته به مردان هدیه ای اعطا کردن که در اون مردان ارزش آزادی خود رو بهتر ببينن و با زندگی متاهلی مقایسه کنن. ♦️همیشه خوشبختی در رسیدن به رویاها

👍141

15 Dec 2025, 10:02 UTC≈3,970 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

چطور یک مرد می تونه از اینکه صبح ۶:۳۰ با ساعت بیدار بشه، از تخت سریع بلند بشه، به زور غذایی بخوره، دستشویی بره، دندون هاش مسواک بزنه و موهاش رو شونه بکشه، و با ترافیک مبارزه کنه تا به جایی برسه تا به ضرورت پول زیادی برای یک نفر دیگر در بیاره و ازش خواستن که از چنین شرایطی قدردانی کنه، لذت ببره؟ چارلز بوکوفسکی، کتاب خدمتکار، ۱۹۷۵ --------- #Quotes --------- ╔═════════════♂️╗ 📻RadioMgtow 🖇Twitter🖇WebSite

👍21

17 Nov 2025, 10:15 UTC≈2,960 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

♦️مجموعه: #تخریب_مردان_در_رسانه 🔶️قسمت یازدهم برای دیدن دیگر قسمت ها، هشتگ مربوطه را در کانال رادیو جست و جو کنید. ------------- #Vinny_Mac ------------- ╔═════════════♂️╗ 📻RadioMgtow 🖇Twitter🖇WebSite 🚸MGTOW_EveryMan 📚Library🖇Instagram ╚═════════════★╝ ﴿ رادیو مگتاو ﴾

🤬41👍1😢1

2 Nov 2025, 10:15 UTC≈2,580 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

♦️مجموعه : #تخریب_مردان_در_رسانه 🔸️قسمت دهم برای دیدن دیگر قسمت های دیگر، هشتگ مربوطه را در کانال رادیو جست و جو کنید. ------------- #Vinny_Mac ------------- ╔═════════════♂️╗ 📻@RadioMGTow 🚸@MGTOW_EveryMan 📚@Mgtowlibrary ╚═════════════★╝ ﴿ رادیو مگتاو ﴾

👍10

2 Oct 2025, 09:00 UTC681 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BarayeMardan

💢 سنت‌گرایی، مردان را زیر اتوبوس می‌اندازد و سپس به آنها می‌گوید که قهرمان هستند (و به آنها احترام می‌گذارد). فمینیسم دقیقاً به همان دلایل و دقیقاً به همان روش مردان را زیر اتوبوس می‌اندازد و سپس به آنها می‌گوید که آشغال‌اند و به آنها تف می‌اندازد کارن استران مردان نسل امروز باید این واقعیت تلخ را بفهمند: چه در سنت‌گرایی و چه در فمینیسم، مردان فقط ابزارند. در سنت‌گرایی، مردان ارزشمند هستند تا وقتی که کار می‌کنند، نا

👍136

23 Sept 2025, 10:35 UTC≈2,790 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

♦️مجموعه: #تخریب_مردان_در_رسانه 🔶️قسمت نهم برای دیدن دیگر قسمت ها، هشتگ مربوطه را در کانال رادیو جست و جو کنید. ------------- #Vinny_Mac ------------- ╔═════════════♂️╗ 📻@RadioMgtow 🖇Twitter🖇WebSite 🚸@MGTOW_EveryMan 📚Library🖇Instagram ╚═════════════★╝ ﴿ رادیو مگتاو ﴾

👍7

22 Aug 2025, 15:04 UTC≈3,440 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⭕️کلاهبرداران در نقاب ردپیل 🔸️اخیرا در برخی جریانات دیده می شود که افرادی با برند ردپیل، از مردان می خواهند که به سنتگرایی، ازدواج با زنان و تشکیل خانواده، با وجود مشکلات اقتصادی و قوانین ضد مرد، برگردند. 🔹️همانطور که در اینجا گفتیم، ردپیل مردان را از سیستم دارای زنمحوری تا جای ممکن خارج می کند. 🔸️چنین افرادی که در حقیقت سنتگرا یا/و مذهبی هستند به دنبال برگرداندن مردان به سنت های مقدس خویش هستند و ازدواج و فرزند آ

👍15

15 Aug 2025, 10:04 UTC870 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

‍ 🔹️در دهه اخیر شمار مردانی که با ذات زن ها آشناتر شده‌اند، افزایش‌یافته است. افرادی که تا حدی دریافته‌اند که زنان تنها به دنبال سود و منفعت خود از روابط هستند؛ اما همچنان مردانی زحمت‌کش و ساده‌دل که نیرنگ‌های جامعه و طبیعت را باور کرده و می‌پندارند جنبش فمینیسم و گلوبالیسم بوده‌اند که زنان را به بیراهه کشانده و اگر آموزش و فرهنگ مناسبی در جامعه باشد، اگر پدران و مادران دختران بهتری تربیت کنند، اگر و اگر و اگر های بس

👍199

8 Aug 2025, 09:31 UTC≈2,340 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⭕️ردپیل ◽️این اصطلاح از سکانسی از فیلم ماتریکس گرفته شده،که شخصیت اصلی بین دو قرص آبی و قرمز، با انتخاب قرص قرمز، به حقایق دنیای خویش پی برده و از خواب بیدار می‌شود. به طور خلاصه، ردپیل بیداری و آگاهی از حقایق تلخ است. 🔹️ردپیل مردان را از تصوراتی که جامعه و رسانه راجب روابط و جنسیت ها القا کرده، خارج و آن‌ها را با واقعیت‌های تلخ و مشکلات روابط آشنا می کند. 🔸️ردپیل به معنای ارتباط با زنان نیست، بلکه معتقد است یک مر

👍12

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @RadioMGtow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 115,379 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Radio MGtow” (@RadioMGtow), 204 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RadioMGtow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.