7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +309. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 84,026β84,786 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 07:24
84,698
+584
11 Aug 2026, 05:21
84,114
-102
10 Aug 2026, 07:07
84,216
-103
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
84,319
+9
8 Aug 2026, 01:38
84,310
-79
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
84,389
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:53
84,389
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
1.63%
avg views Γ· 84,698 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,380
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.07%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
66 (6 August 2026 β 12 August 2026)
Views total
91,265
Reactions total
3,712
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
β26,700
Videos
β177
Links
β776
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,712 reactions across 66 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3,712reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
βοΈβοΈ π π π £ π π π π £π π π ’ βοΈβοΈ
β‘οΈβ‘οΈβ‘οΈCode-----> DN64VX
This is directly from the Club management and match officials, Don't joke with it
Everyone should stake high On Singles and Combine To win Good profit ππΎ
@BET_GOD_022 ππππ
All Those Who Said They Are Going For A Loan To Participate With Us Today Can Go On β¦
We Have No Chance Of Losing β
All Those Having This Official Ticket Already ,Please Stake High β β
@BET_GOD_022
I have no time to talk much about this ticket π«
Stake High and win massively with usπ₯π₯π₯π₯
Thanks for trusting my service from UK π¬π§ β β β
One trusted subscriber from Uganda πΊπ¬
Stake Very High And Make Big Money π° Good Luck Sir β β β
In Advance To You Brother From Uganda πΊπ¬ πͺ
Letβs use this official Combo Ticket π« break the record in this channel!!!
We are Tired Of Losingβ¦. letβs Start Recovering all Our Entire Lost!
Weβre accepting only (4) Slots Tonight π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
@BET_GOD_022
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
Both Official Club Team Managers have accepted the exact score of the matchβ€οΈβ€οΈ
All my Today subscribers are 100% Assured to win Todayβs Ticket π π₯π
Inbox π₯ me if interestedπ
Telegram @BET_GOD_022
Whatsapp : https://wa.me/233509897528
βοΈβοΈ π π π £ π π π π £π π π ’ βοΈβοΈ
β‘οΈβ‘οΈβ‘οΈCode-----> 8KGVWS
This is directly from the Club management and match officials, Don't joke with it
Everyone should stake high On Singles and Combine To win Good profit ππΎ
@BET_GOD_022 ππππ
π24β€18π16π―8π2
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @REALGOD11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
CLEMENT ODDS @CLEMENTODDS Β· 330,013 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 12 August 2026
πSON OF AFRICA122πΎπΈ @Soaoddss Β· 234,213 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here β alongside 76 others β read 12 August 2026
βοΈ VVIP WINNERS ARENA π―πΏ @Vipwinners1 Β· 441,419 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here β alongside 78 others β read 12 August 2026
ZEUS AVENUE @ZEUSAVENUE Β· 213,692 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 12 August 2026
ππ ππππ πΏ π πππ πππππππππππ @TheOfficialEPOdds Β· 307,733 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 12 August 2026
NANA KOJO ODDS @Nanakojoodds Β· 159,762 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here β alongside 70 others β read 12 August 2026
THE WINNING VAULT π― @THEWINNINGVAULTGH Β· 148,370 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here β alongside 76 others β read 12 August 2026
Sports24online Analysis @official_sports24online Β· 146,513 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here β alongside 83 others β read 13 August 2026
β½οΈSWANZY ODDS OFFICIALβ½οΈ @swanzyoddsofficial05 Β· 238,466 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here β alongside 75 others β read 12 August 2026
Enokay69 Prediction Hub π₯π @enokayPredictions Β· 179,262 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here β alongside 72 others β read 12 August 2026
GRACE ODDSππ―π§ @GRACEODDS225 Β· 190,291 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 12 August 2026
ODDS ORACLE @THEOFFICIALORACLE1 Β· 425,800 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here β alongside 75 others β read 12 August 2026
RICHβODDSβ26 @RICHODDS26 Β· 153,566 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here β alongside 75 others β read 12 August 2026
BOOM TIPS 25 β½οΈ @boomtips25 Β· 149,526 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 12 August 2026
DKAY ODDSπ°π @ORACLEANAS Β· 192,114 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here β alongside 74 others β read 12 August 2026
KSANALYSIS.org π¦π¦π¦ @KSANALYSIS1 Β· 239,387 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 67 here β alongside 66 others β read 12 August 2026
KIWIBET @kiwibet01 Β· 220,087 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 12 August 2026
SportyBet @SportybetOfficialChannel Β· 158,201 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 68 here β alongside 67 others β read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββοΈππππππππ βοΈπππ βοΈπππ πβ (@REALGOD11), 84,698 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/REALGOD11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.