Video, posted without a caption

Channel
ODDS KINGπβ½οΈπ
@ODDSKING23
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
9,904subscribers
-685 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001880508221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ODDSKING23 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ODDSKING23 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 9,904 | -78 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 9,982 | -34 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 10,016 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 10,069 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 10,094 | -24 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 10,118 | -22 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 10,140 | -38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 10,178 | -75 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 10,253 | -80 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 10,333 | -54 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 10,387 | -56 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 10,443 | -39 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 10,482 | -24 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 10,506 | -52 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 10,558 | -31 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 10,589 | first reading |
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 1.70%
- avg views Γ· 9,904 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 168
- 138 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.64%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 138
- of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (13 August 2026 β 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 23,213 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 25 | 69.4% | |
| π₯ | 4 | 11.1% | |
| π― | 3 | 8.33% | |
| π | 2 | 5.56% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 2.78% | |
| π | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Those who are risking their hard earned money on my ticket are not fools They're courageous risk takers who know the benefits of riskβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈ The Choice is yours now to take the risk or watch us winning π β β β If you lost it, Expose our page as scam!!π₯π₯π₯
IF YOU HAVE 300GH YOU CAN TAP IN TO MAKE YOUR PAYMENT THIS IS THE BEST OFFER EVER @YOUR_TRAPA
Am Not here to Brag I always Prove myself From doubt In Public Stake High Bro Iβm @YOUR_TRAPA
We are giving Full Discount to all trusted subscribers for us to enjoy this Official Combo ticket π« Today π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ 5 Slots Available nowππππππππππππππππ₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ Inbox Me For The Discount Price @YOUR_TRAPA
DEAL ONGOING πβ€ INBOX π₯ DEAL ONGOING πβ€ INBOX π₯ @YOUR_TRAPA @YOUR_TRAPA @YOUR_TRAPA @YOUR_TRAPA WhatsApp- https://wa.me/+233533175585
Letβs use this official Combo Ticket π« break the record in this channel!!! Another 1 Million Ghana Cedis is About To Go Down!!!!π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ π₯π₯π₯I will never come here often or regularly to brag about fixed match... You've seen me do it times without numbers.. sometimes I do it for fun .. but when it comes to making money π°..I never joke with good information We are Tired Of Losingβ¦. letβs Start Recovering all Our Entire β¦
Video, posted without a caption
Todays Tickets Is Ready From Our Australia Source π¦πΊ π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ I will take this opportunity to bless those who Trust me !!!! Special ticket offers available for only (5) FIVE Slot Inbox me when youβre ready π @YOUR_TRAPA
Joy Don Full Body oooπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉπΉ Full heatπ₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ OUR FIXED MATCH HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY BOTH CLUB TEAM MANAGEMENT π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ @YOUR_TRAPA
π₯ 6+ Odds π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ π₯ 3/3 WIN π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ π₯π₯ CODE ββ> 9C6DWG ββ Good Luck ππ
β€2
ππ°πCodeββ> AWNTDE βοΈGood luck my Boys and Girls ππ β
β€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @ODDSKING23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@KB_ODD Β· 101,793
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here β alongside 56 others β read 15 August 2026
@Razakvvip Β· 43,284
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here β alongside 69 others β read 28 August 2026
@officialmdodds Β· 183,558
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here β alongside 76 others β read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βODDS KINGπβ½οΈπβ (@ODDSKING23), 9,904 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ODDSKING23.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.