Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

الدَفْتَرُ السُنِي

@Philopions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

317subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002207680300
TypeChannel
Username@Philopions
Descriptionالمعقولات و المنقولات
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Philopions

Growth

3177 Aug 2026, 17:04 — 317 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:33 — 317 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:048 Aug 2026, 07:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 316–318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:33317no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:04317first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.4%
avg views ÷ 317 subscribers
Avg views / post
122
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,193
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
281
Videos
34
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3181.6%
😭37.89%
👍25.26%
👏12.63%
🤨12.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @al1411aa1

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته السؤال الأول مولانا ما هي حقيقة الطبائع على المذهب الأشعري أهي مجرد أعراض قائمة بالجواهر الفردة وكيف نفرق بينها وبين مذهب الحكماء في الصور النوعية؟ السؤال الثاني أليس هناك تقارب شديد بين مذهب الأشاعرة ومذهب وحدة الوجود فالأول نفى مطلق التأثير عن غير الله والثاني نفى كون الماهية منشأ الآثار فكلاهما ينفي كون الشيء له أثر ذاتي؟

Signed سامي

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته أهلا بكم هي أعراض من قبيل الكيفيات المحسوسة ، تقوم بالأجسام عند تألف الجواهر الفردة ، وبالتالي تقوم بالجواهر الفردة بالتبع أو بالصالة على الخلاف ، فلا توجد عندهم صورة نوعية في النار تقتضي الحرارة واليبوسة ولا في الهواء تقتضي الحرارة والرطوبة ، بل نفس هاته الكيفيات العرضية هي مبدأ الامتياز فيما بين الجواهر المتماثلة والأجسام المتجانسة ، وحينها لا تسمى هاته الكيفيات طبائع ولا صورا نوع

Signed سامي

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026

الأشاعرة ينفون التأثير لنفي مبدأه وهو الطبائع والصور النوعية ، بل هذا متفق عليه أصلا بين المعتزلة والأشاعرة والماتريدية الا في مسألة قدرة العبد والتوليد وخلافا لقلة قليلة منهم . اما وحدة الوجود فتثبت قوى جعلها الله في الاشياء ولها تاثير ، ولكنه تاثير وجودي لا ماهوي ، يرجع لله مباشرة بوجوده المنبسط بين الاشياء ، فاذن هم هنا على خلاف بقية المتكلمين .

Signed سامي

5 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC75 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

قال الإمام جعفر بن محمد الصادق : لعن الله المعتزلة أرادت أن توحد فألحدت، ورامت أن ترفع التشبيه فأثبتت.

2

Signed سامي

4 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC58 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @almaktaba95

أنشر هذا وقد تكون عندي ملاحظات عليه،ولكن بالجملة العمل طيب والجمع ممتاز وأسأل الله أن يبارك فيه، وهو مرجع لابد منه لمن أراد أن يكتب وينقد في مثل هذا الأمر.

Signed سامي

4 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @YMHS11234

🔴 فهرست التحريف من 1 الى 100 👈(هنا) 🔴 🔴 كتاب تحريف الشيعة لفضائل الصحابة (هنا) 🔴 📚الاعترافات حول الكذب والتحريف - الاعتراف بتحريف الروايات وبترها - محاولة إخفاء كوارث متقدمي الشيعة - محاولة الخوئي لإخفاء كوارث اصحاب الائمة - اعترافات علماء الشيعة بتحريفات الصدوق - اعتراف الوائلي ان الشيعة يكذبون بالمصادر 📚مواضيع حول الإمام البخاري - فهرست توضيح الشبهات حول الامام البخاري - اعتراف علماء الشيعة بصدق الامام البخاري -

1

Signed سامي

3 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

إن اخترت أن تكون داعية، تجنب العنف والسياسة والتقليد للآخرين الشيخ حسن محمود الشافعي

👏1

Signed سامي

2 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC95 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AlDamanhuri

كلام كتير يمكن أن يقال عن أوضاعنا -كمسلمين- على المستوى الشخصي والإنساني ، أو على مستوى الأوطان ، او على مستوى الأمة .. لكنه كلام جارح ينتقص من الكرامة ، فلنبلع ألسنتنا إذ الكلام لا يجدي .. والبيِّنَة عَيِّنَة كما يقال. . شخصية المسلم تحتاج إلى إعادة صياغة، وإعادة تكوين، وإعادة ترتيب لسلم الأولويات، وإعادة ضبط للعقل والقلب والجوارح، وإخراج من أوهام السوق ، وأوهام الكهف ، وأوهام المسرح! . الأوطان تبنئ عن أمة عاجزة ، أ

😭3

Signed سامي

31 Jul 2026, 13:55 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

قال النبي ﷺ: «الدين النصيحة» قالوا: لمن يا رسول الله!؟ قال: «لله ولكتابه ولرسوله ولأئمة المسلمين وعامتهم»

6

Signed سامي

29 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC155 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @TurathulAwniPhoto

مباهلة السلفية المعاصرة في أئمة المسلمين !

👍21

Signed سامي

23 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @alr5emy

المقلد لا يجترئ أن يقول أخطأ ابن تيمية والرازي وابن عربي، فهو يرى الحق في الأسماء ولا يرى الحق الثابت في نفسه، وبعضهم يظهر التخطئة مقلدا بذلك عالما آخر، فهو في فلك التقليد دائر، في التصويب هو مقلد وفي التخطئة كذلك، ويحب أن يكون صغيرا دائما في العلوم ولا يحب أن يكون له رأي في أي مسألة، هذا نوع من الهوان النفسي قبل العلمي، العبودية جنس، ونوع منها هذا التقليد القبيح، وإذا ذكر رأيا خاصا به قدم المقدمات الباردة من نحو يقو

2

Signed سامي

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Philopions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الدَفْتَرُ السُنِي” (@Philopions), 317 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Philopions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.