๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ SCOTLAND - W ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2๐1
Signed Shiva
![Telegram profile photo for ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ โก โข [Faster Than Ever]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/89/89f7e5d460f22e340b0b9d8faa919eeb70821ac6e440a5d00c6cdd21599a2f8d.jpg)
Channel
@maxtosslinee
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
86,570subscribers
+37,712 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001652422203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maxtosslinee |
| Description | ๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ'๐ ๐ก๐ผ.๐ญ ๐ฆ๐บ๐ผ๐ผ๐๐ต ๐ฆ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ http://BETBHAI.GAME http://RANA365.BET ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ฒ โ DAILY SCHEDULE ๐ CRICKET NEWS ๐ฐ TOSS LOAD ๐ Market Ka Fast Line https://t.me/maxtosslinee @maxtosslinee |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maxtosslinee |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 102 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @maxtosslinee/98536 ยท this entry8 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC | @crictossline21/1495808 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crictossline21/15021924 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC | @maxtosslinee/99224 ยท this entry24 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @maxtosslinee/100158 ยท this entry15 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC | @crictossline21/15118215 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC | 1.00 | 3 minutes |
| @crictossline21/15122416 Sept 2026, 20:59 UTC | @maxtosslinee/100194 ยท this entry16 Sept 2026, 21:05 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| @maxtosslinee/101169 ยท this entry10 Oct 2026, 14:13 UTC | @crictossline21/15225910 Oct 2026, 14:18 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @maxtosslinee/101336 ยท this entry15 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC | @crictossline21/15252616 Oct 2026, 21:08 UTC | 1.00 | 31 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @crictossline21 | 77 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 5 minutes | this entry (62โ15) |
| @GOD_OF_LOAD_ORIGINAL | 74 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 56 minutes | this entry (59โ15) |
| @BHUVILINELINK | 72 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (41โ31) |
| @fastesttossline2011 | 58 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 minutes | this entry (42โ16) |
| @DTLLEAKER_ORIGINAL | 32 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (18โ14) |
| @CRICBOUNCERTOSSLINE | 24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @CRICBOUNCERTOSSLINE (18โ6) |
| @avengerstossline | 22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @avengerstossline (14โ8) |
| @MONEY_MAKER_MM_ORIGINAL | 19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | this entry (12โ7) |
| @MONEY_MAKER_REAL_ORIGINAL | 17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | this entry (11โ6) |
| @SkullTossLine | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7.9 hours | this entry (9โ5) |
| @PRIMELEAKERBABA | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4.8 hours | this entry (8โ6) |
| @CRICTOSSLINE | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 11 minutes | @CRICTOSSLINE (6โ0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 153 of the 153 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 1,037 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 102 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @diamondex888. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entryโs content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy ยท clone_mutual ยท clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 102 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โFirstโ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โForwarded fromโ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
51 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 86,570 | -230 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:47 | 86,800 | -266 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 87,066 | +19,689 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:38 | 67,377 | -153 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:15 | 67,530 | -81 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:24 | 67,611 | -394 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:04 | 68,005 | -984 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:24 | 68,989 | -227 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 69,216 | -323 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 69,539 | -464 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 70,003 | -11,084 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 81,087 | -7,247 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 88,334 | -267 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 88,601 | -211 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 88,812 | -516 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:25 | 89,328 | -2,417 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 91,745 | -395 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 92,140 | -525 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:10 | 92,665 | -563 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 93,228 | first reading |
2,793 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 219 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 486 of 754 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,793 (6 August 2026 โ 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,521,618 |
| Reactions total | 1,301 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 05:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
1,737 reactions across 646 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 736 | 42.4% | |
| ๐ | 457 | 26.3% | |
| ๐ฅ | 252 | 14.5% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 76 | 4.38% | |
| ๐ | 67 | 3.86% | |
| ๐ | 30 | 1.73% | |
| ๐ | 20 | 1.15% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 1.04% | |
| ๐ฏ | 15 | 0.864% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 0.461% | |
| โก | 6 | 0.345% | |
| ๐ญ | 6 | 0.345% | |
| ๐ข | 4 | 0.23% | |
| ๐คฌ | 4 | 0.23% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.173% | |
| ๐ณ | 3 | 0.173% | |
| ๐จ | 3 | 0.173% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 0.173% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 0.173% | |
| ๐คฃ | 3 | 0.173% | |
| 15 further kinds | 20 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 648 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1,737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 1 of 756 posts held from the last 30 days (0.132%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ SCOTLAND - W ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2๐1
Signed Shiva
๐ฑ๐ฐ SRI LANKA - W ๐ฑ๐ฐ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2
Signed Shiva
๐ฆ๐ซ AFGHANISTAN U-19 ๐ฆ๐ซ HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST โ๏ธโ๏ธ
๐ฅ2โค1
Signed Shiva
๐ง๐ฉ BANGLADESH U-19 ๐ง๐ฉ HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2
Signed Shiva
๐ฌ๐บ OMR CHECKER ๐ฌ๐บ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2๐ฅ1
Signed P A R T H I โข
๐ณ๐ฌ MELBOURNE STAR - W ๐ณ๐ฌ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2
Signed P A R T H I โข
๐ WBBL TOSS TIME ๐
โค4๐1
Signed P A R T H I โข
๐ป๐ช NORTHERN BRAVE ๐ป๐ช WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค2
Signed Shiva
๐ฒ๐ด CENTRAL STAGS ๐ฒ๐ด WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
๐ฅ2
Signed Shiva
๐ช๐ช AUCKLAND ๐ช๐ช WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BOWL โ๏ธโ๏ธ
๐2๐ฅ1
Signed Shiva
๐ฟ๐ฆ WARRIOR ๐ฟ๐ฆ HAVE WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL FIRST โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค3๐1๐ฅ1
Signed Shiva
๐ฌ๐ผ DESERT CHAMPIONS ๐ฌ๐ผ WON THE TOSS AND DECIDED TO BAT โ๏ธโ๏ธ
โค4๐1๐1
Signed P A R T H I โข
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,793 posts we hold for @maxtosslinee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 39 posts on @maxtosslinee as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ โก โข [Faster Than Ever]โ (@maxtosslinee), 86,570 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxtosslinee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.