https://possible11.com/news/ind-w-vs-hk-w-live-streaming-how-to-watch-womens-asia-cup-2026-match-7-live/

Channel
Possible11 - Cricket Match Prediction
@possible11app
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,409subscribers
-1,459 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001264505148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @possible11app |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/possible11app |
Topic
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 20,409 | -156 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 20,565 | -214 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 20,779 | -143 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:57 | 20,922 | -50 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 20,972 | -24 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:56 | 20,996 | -31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 21,027 | -64 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 21,091 | -60 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 21,151 | -81 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 21,232 | -49 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 | 21,281 | -39 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 21,320 | -27 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 21,347 | -24 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 21,371 | -49 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 21,420 | -31 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 21,451 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 21,462 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 21,473 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 21,492 | -31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 21,523 | first reading |
Engagement
499 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 499 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
502 reactions across 278 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 349 | 69.5% | |
| 👍 | 99 | 19.7% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 5.78% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 2.99% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.797% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.398% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.398% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.199% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.199% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 281 of the 499 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🏏 SL and GL Teams have been updated in the app ✅ 🏏 W Asia Cup 2026 🔥 ✅ Check out the App Now ⚡️ https://possible11.com/app/ Non - Possible11 users can download via link https://possible11.com/download-app/
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
India Women Confirmed Playing11: 1- Smriti Mandhana, 2- Shafali Verma, 3- Pratika Rawal, 4- Harmanpreet Kaur(c), 5- Bharti Fulmali, 6- Richa Ghosh(w), 7- Deepti Sharma, 8- Prema Rawat, 9- Nandani Sharma, 10- Shree Charani, 11- Kranti Gaud Hong Kong, China Women Confirmed Playing11: 1- Natasha Miles(c), 2- Maryam Bibi, 3- Mariko Hill, 4- Joyleen Kaur, 5- Marina Lamplough, 6- Yasmin Daswani(w), 7- Shanzeen Shahzad, …
❤3
🇭🇰 HONG KONG - W 🇭🇰 WON THE TOSS AND OPTED TO BOWL
❤3
https://possible11.com/videos/shorts/hardik-pandya-leaving-from-bcci-coe/
❤1
NAM vs ZIM 5th T20I Live Streaming: How to Watch Namibia Tri-Series 2026 Live on TV & Mobile https://possible11.com/news/nam-vs-zim-5th-t20i-live-streaming-how-to-watch-namibia-tri-series-2026-live-on-tv-mobile/
👍2
🏏 SL and GL Teams have been updated in the app ✅ 🏏 ENGW vs IREW, 2nd ODI 🔥 🏏Namibia T20I Tri-Series 2026🔥 ✅ Check out the App Now ⚡️ https://possible11.com/app/ Non - Possible11 users can download via link https://possible11.com/download-app/
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Teams: Ireland Women (Playing XI): Alice Tector, Gaby Lewis(c), Amy Hunter(w), Orla Prendergast, Rebecca Stokell, Leah Paul, Louise Little, Kia McCartney, Cara Murray, Jane Maguire, Georgina Dempsey England Women (Playing XI): Maia Bouchier, Sophia Dunkley, Jodi Grewcock, Alice Capsey(w), Freya Kemp, Danielle Gibson, Charlotte Dean(c), Mady Villiers, Issy Wong, Ryana MacDonald-Gay, Tilly Corteen-Coleman
❤1
Teams: Namibia (Playing XI): Louren Steenkamp, Jan Frylinck, Gerhard Erasmus(c), Jan Nicol Loftie-Eaton, JJ Smit, Ruben Trumpelmann, Zane Green(w), Alexander Volschenk, Jan Balt, Jack Brassell, Max Heingo Zimbabwe (Playing XI): Brian Bennett, Ben Curran, Innocent Kaia, Wesley Madhavere, Sikandar Raza(c), Ryan Burl, Tadiwanashe Marumani(w), Brad Evans, Wellington Masakadza, Blessing Muzarabani, Kundai Matigimu
❤1
England Women have won the toss and have opted to field
❤1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 499 posts we hold for @possible11app. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 27 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who will win the toss?
- NAM43%
- ZIM64%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who will win today's match?
- EN-W86%
- IR-W29%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who will win today's match?
- SL-W81%
- INA-W35%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who will win today's match?
- DUB75%
- ROT44%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who will win today's match?
- ZIM40%
- SA67%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who will win today's match?
- BD-W59%
- INA-W47%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 499 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@p11football · 2,296#1
@AnuragxCricket · 1,965,576#2
@mf11ofc · 6,132#3
@beatfantasy1 · 4,683#4
@p11kabaddi · 3,309#5
@bestpick · 86,514#6
@fantasyteammakerskills · 6,725#7
@cricinformer · 263,067#8
@TyrionFantasy4803 · 2,889#9
@CRICDJ · 20,321#10
@ALLPRIMELEAKERKING · 4,138#11
@awarnessTM · 2,526#12
@AkashVirat18 · 2,628#13
@TuPhirJitayega · 5,513#14
@souravsamajik84 · 33,599#15
@dreamperfect_11 · 25,497#16
@crictracker · 32,000#17
@Perfect_Lineup · 1,585#18
@foxy4ex · 2,906#19
@primeleak808 · 953#20
@ronaldovsmessifantasyfather · 2,026#21
@EliteFantasy1 · 2,175#22
@tg_software_prime · 1,242#23
@prediction_king_9900 · 24,576#24
@Fantasypanditg · 16,753#25
@domesticlogic · 2,822#26
@fantasyexpertnews · 5,839#27
@dhonifantasysports · 7,073#28
@play_with_sai_teams · 1,169#29
@Cryptofy_India · 1,205#30
@bullsandbeartrade · 1,832#31
@cricfootfantasy · 2,202#32
@AakashChopraOfficial · 178,854#33
@profantasytips · 3,536#34
@fantasygram7 · 51,777#35
@PRIMELEAKERBABA · 20,458#36
@FantasyTadka95 · 14,750#37
@Royalindianyoutube · 5,219#38
@FantasyLossCover · 123,383#39
@Perfectwinofficial · 44,329#40
@ecst10official1 · 384#41
@winner78613 · 10,367#42
@Fantasy_Yatra_Teamsss · 2,639#43
@grandleagueexpertranu · 61,561#44
@ShivamSporting · 6,261#45
@Prime_Leak_PrimeLeakbaba · 28,965#46
@Team11star · 79,736#47
@glexpertranu · 5,458#48
@GL0tdLgrWIUwZGM9 · 1,337 (as read 26 September 2026)#49
@BHANU708PTEAMS · 99,328#50
@GrealishTeams · 86,292#51
@RAMESHINFO13 · 965#52
@championsgurukul · 2,827#53
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dreamperfect_11 · 25,497
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 13 September 2026
@crictracker · 32,000
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 September 2026
@Perfectwinofficial · 44,329
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@cricgram · 18,845
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 October 2026
@grandleagueexpertranu · 61,561
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Possible11 - Cricket Match Prediction” (@possible11app), 20,409 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/possible11app.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.