Ирина Певчая. Экстрасенс и таролог, участница Битва Экстрасенсов.
Делаю честные расклады Таро, помогаю понять ситуацию и найти верное направление.
💌 Запись на расклады: @Pevchayacons
Created
12 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @PEVCHAYAi — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,915–34,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 21:55
33,964
+22
13 Aug 2026, 16:48
33,942
-31
12 Aug 2026, 15:53
33,973
-29
11 Aug 2026, 12:17
34,002
-31
10 Aug 2026, 11:54
34,033
-24
9 Aug 2026, 14:21
34,057
-26
8 Aug 2026, 17:38
34,083
-29
7 Aug 2026, 16:15
34,112
-9
7 Aug 2026, 12:45
34,121
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.09%
avg views ÷ 33,964 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,750
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
40 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
107,100
Reactions total
4,338
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,860
Videos
≈685
Links
≈406
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,338 reactions across 39 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,900
66.9%
❤🔥
718
16.6%
🔥
436
10.1%
👍
86
1.98%
🥰
81
1.87%
👏
45
1.04%
🤣
37
0.853%
💔
18
0.415%
🫡
13
0.3%
👻
2
0.046%
😭
2
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️
Сегодня день про контакт. Не про глобальные встречи, а про то, как вы впускаете или не впускаете людей в свою жизнь. Вы можете почувствовать, что с кем-то легко и просто, словно давно знакомы, хотя встретились впервые. Или, наоборот, заметить, что с близким человеком вдруг стало тесно и неловко. День подходит для того, чтобы честно поговорить, помириться или хотя бы написать тому, кто давно не давал о …
🖇Сделай это сегодня до полуночи, если хочешь, чтобы он думал только о тебе🖇
Возьми ложку мёда, добавь в чай и мешай по часовой стрелке, наговаривая шепотом: «Как мёд сладок да липок, так и ты (имя) ко мне душой и телом прилипай».
Дай ему отпить или выпей сама с мыслями о нём!
Важный момент - у вас уже должны быть теплые отношения. Это не приворот❄️
👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️
День, когда ваши навыки и труд будут замечены. Вас могут попросить совета, подключить к важному проекту или публично оценить вашу работу - и это будет приятно, потому что вы это заслужили. Хорошо показывать себя не в одиночку, а в команде. Тот, кого вы раньше считали просто коллегой, сегодня может стать опорой в общем деле. День подходит для учебы и оттачивания навыков - осваивайте новое, чтобы в будущ…
🤩САМОСГЛАЗ: ТЫ САМ СЕБЕ ГЛАВНЫЙ ВРАГ
Мы привыкли думать, что сглаз - это когда кто-то со стороны позавидовал, посмотрел не так, сказал лишнее. Но есть вещь пострашнее - самосглаз. И он случается с нами гораздо чаще, чем чужой негатив.
▪️Самосглаз - это когда человек сам разрушает своё поле мыслями, словами и ожиданиями.
🔮Как это выглядит:
Рассказала о планах - и всё сорвалось. Похвасталась зарплатой - деньги ушли…
👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️
Сегодня лучше побыть в тишине и замедлиться. Внешний шум будет только мешать - сейчас важно слышать себя, а не других. День подходит для того, чтобы побыть наедине с собой, почитать, помечтать или просто понаблюдать за тем, что происходит вокруг. Не стоит лезть в споры, доказывать свою правоту и проявлять инициативу. Лучше довериться тому, что чувствуете, даже если не можете объяснить почему. Ответы пр…
Сегодня было солнечное затмение 🌓
Днём это выглядело как обычная среда. Но те, кто чувствует, знают: внутри могло быть тревожно, мутно, как будто земля на секунду ушла из-под ног.
Сейчас вечер. Самое время не листать ленту, а зафиксировать состояние.
Затмение - это сбой программы. Всё тайное вылезает, всё ложное обостряется. Поэтому:
🌌если сегодня накрыло эмоциями - это не просто так.
🌌если вспомнился человек из п…
👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️
Сегодня вы почувствуете прилив энергии и желание действовать. День будет быстрым, ярким, возможно, даже немного авантюрным. Если у вас давно была идея, которую вы откладывали - сегодня отличный день, чтобы начать. Возможны неожиданные новости, поездки или предложения, которые заставят вас принимать решения на ходу. Но есть и обратная сторона: эта энергия может подтолкнуть к импульсивным шагам. Вы может…
🪞Не делай этого, когда смотришь на себя в зеркало.
Зеркало - это мощный энергетический портал, который усиливает всё, что вы ему скажете. Поэтому главное правило: никакого негатива.
Вот что эзотерики и народные приметы категорически не рекомендуют делать перед зеркалом:
🌟Ругать себя и жаловаться. Не критикуйте внешность, не говорите: страшная, я толстая, всё плохо. Это программирует вашу реальность на неудачи.
🌟Пла…
👁️🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 🌹🌹🌹👁️
День будет про удержание. Вы можете чувствовать тревогу за деньги, ресурсы или личное пространство. Кто-то может покушаться на ваши границы и вы резко захотите их защитить. Возможно желание копить, экономить и вообще ни с кем не делиться - ни временем, ни деньгами, ни эмоциями. Это нормально, но главное в этой позиции - не зажать себя настолько, чтобы перекрыть поток. Держите равновесие между сохранени…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @PEVCHAYAi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,019,052 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Череватый Влад || Official @CherevatyiVlad · 247,184 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
Райдотека @raidoteka · 156,914 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
Телеканал ТНТ @TNT_television · 299,296 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PEVCHAYA” (@PEVCHAYAi), 33,964 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PEVCHAYAi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
