Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Elena Cherevata

Channel

Elena Cherevata

@elenacherevata

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,448subscribers

-2,187 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747598001
TypeChannel
Username@elenacherevata
Descriptionhttps://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67984590b0db9a5cd344eedb
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/elenacherevata

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CherevatyiVlad/1204211 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC@elenacherevata/5660 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@CherevatyiVlad5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@CherevatyiVlad (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 123 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

33,44835,63534,541.57 August 202614 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 99 days, net -2,187. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,120–35,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 04:2033,448-45
11 Nov 2026, 07:1533,493+15
9 Nov 2026, 11:4033,478+10
8 Nov 2026, 04:1633,468+20
6 Nov 2026, 22:1733,448-6
6 Nov 2026, 00:2533,454-23
5 Nov 2026, 02:0033,477-45
4 Nov 2026, 04:3933,522-17
3 Nov 2026, 06:5633,539-18
2 Nov 2026, 10:0033,557-46
1 Nov 2026, 07:4533,603-22
31 Oct 2026, 09:4433,625-17
30 Oct 2026, 12:5533,642-43
29 Oct 2026, 10:4933,685-42
28 Oct 2026, 11:0633,727-8
27 Oct 2026, 13:0633,735-18
26 Oct 2026, 14:0133,753-43
25 Oct 2026, 14:0433,796-34
24 Oct 2026, 12:3433,830-21
23 Oct 2026, 15:0033,851first reading

Engagement

238 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.68%
avg views ÷ 33,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,900
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 238 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held238 (31 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total174,290
Reactions total13,116
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,170
Videos
≈930
Links
≈121

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
31m 14s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

56,789 reactions across 238 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤37,68466.4%
❤‍🔥10,20318.0%
👍2,0003.52%
🔥1,8873.32%
💘1,6632.93%
🥰1,2422.19%
😍1,1502.03%
😁3910.689%
🍓2140.377%
🤩2050.361%
🎉1500.264%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 238 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56,789 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 238 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @elenacherevata. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 238 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,120 views161 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

В выходные, когда Лёва не ходит в садик, стараемся посвящать ему как можно больше времени. И сегодняшний день как раз из таких! 💞Вышли на вечернюю прогулку, немного сменить обстановку, подышать свежим воздухом и просто побыть вместе. Иногда именно такие простые моменты становятся самыми ценными. А как проходит ваш вечер? Уже отдыхаете дома или тоже выбрались погулять?

❤‍🔥103❤43🥰10👍3😍2

13 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC≈2,040 views251 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Варенье 😂🙈

🔥135❤64😁24❤‍🔥13🥰8👍4😍2🤩1

13 Nov 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,230 views204 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Доброе утро ☀️ У нас сегодня по планам навести порядок в шкафчике Левы в садике, а у вас какие планы на сегодня?

❤‍🔥140❤42🥰14💘4😍3🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 15:21 UTC≈2,210 views175 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Я считаю, что забота о себе начинается с маленьких приятностей. 🦺👕🩳🧦👔🧢 С новой вещью, в которой нравится себе отражение, с уютного образа или просто с возможности немного порадовать себя без особого повода. А в такую погоду это особенно актуально! Поэтому в @chrevo_online мы подготовили для вас кое-что приятное — 8 готовых комплектов по специальным ценам. Мы собрали вещи так, чтобы вам было проще выбирать не отдел…

❤140❤‍🔥20🤩7🥰3👍2💘1🔥1😍1

12 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,970 views222 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤170❤‍🔥33😍12🥰6🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,250 views227 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Долгожданная новая серия готовки! Сегодня снова собираемся на кухне, чтобы приготовить сразу несколько вкусных домашних блюд! Будет много готовки, аппетитных моментов и, конечно, душевных разговоров. Сегодня в нашем меню: 🥣 Паштет из куриной печени 🥔 Картошка 🥞 Блинчики 🥩 Отбивные 🍳 Ароматная зажарка

❤170❤‍🔥28🔥17🥰5👍3😍2💘1🤩1

11 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈2,180 views214 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Закупка перед готовкой ✨

❤166❤‍🔥23💘7😍6👍4🥰4🤩3🍓1

11 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,380 views152 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, у нас для вас приятные новости! 🦺👕🩳🧦👔🧢 @chrevo_online С 11 по 24 ноября в CHREVO действует особенное предложение на комплекты одежды. Мы подготовили для вас 8 готовых сочетаний, чтобы вам не приходилось тратить время на поиски вещей, которые идеально дополняют друг друга. Мы уже продумали образы, подобрали детали и объединили любимые вещи CHREVO в гармоничные комплекты. А приобрести любимые вещи вместе те…

💘82❤47❤‍🔥19🥰3😍1

10 Nov 2026, 20:17 UTC≈2,260 views294 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤193❤‍🔥43😁31🔥12💘7🤩3😍3🥰2

10 Nov 2026, 14:24 UTC≈19,900 views239 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Video

Коротко о том, как мы ходили за ковром 😂

❤178❤‍🔥26💘14🥰10😁10😍1

10 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,680 views242 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026
Forwarded from @CherevatyiVladVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤170❤‍🔥28😁21😍10👍5🥰4💘2🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC≈2,820 views225 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Доброе утро 💞 Отвезла Льва в садик, съездила за продуктами, а теперь еду готовить что-нибудь вкусненькое. А как началось ваше утро?

❤179❤‍🔥19🥰19💘3👍2😍2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 238 posts we hold for @elenacherevata. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Oct 2026, 12:22 UTCAnonymous Poll261 voters

Определили цели?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет15%
  3. Не хочу14%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Sept 2026, 06:37 UTCAnonymous Poll224 voters

Было?

  1. Дааа86%
  2. Нет21%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 238 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Череватый Влад || Official
@CherevatyiVlad · 241,801
#1
PEVCHAYA
@PEVCHAYAi · 28,072
#2
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,337
#3
ARTYOM CHERNYSHOV
@artyemofficial · 1,876
#4
Саманта Адам
@samanta_adam · 10,791
#5
secret garden 2
@mantra366oi · 2,583
#6
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,700
#7
vrlona
@vrrlona · 1,269
#8
𝑩𝒚𝒕𝒗𝒂𝒂𝒆♡
@bytvaae · 1,537
#9
ИРИНА ИГНАТЕНКО
@irinaaaign · 3,149
#10
матвиксф💋💋
@matvxf_j · 1,351
#11
нᴀᴩᴇɜᴏᴋ ᴏᴛ 𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨♡
@narezokotsherro · 1,441
#12
Elena Raytman
@elenaraytman · 842,407
#13
Anka Peresild
@officialannaperesild · 178,816
#14
Надежда Шевченко
@mnogolikmagic · 28,503
#15
𝒰𝓃𝒾𝓉𝓎 𝑜𝒻 𝒦&𝐿&𝐵 🔮
@bitvakerrofan · 2,841
#16
bitva.sluhi 🪬| Битва экстрасенсов| Битва Сильнейших | Битва Слухи
@bitvasluhi · 1,176
#17
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,920
#18
enina24
@ane4ka24 · 102,982
#19
димаксвл
@dimaxwl2 · 1,116
#20
Патриция Адам | ПРОСНИСЬ
@magia_vokrug · 2,155
#21
ʍиᴩ 𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙤♡
@psychics_meow1 · 300
#22
ОЛЕГ ШЕПС || ЕДИНСТВЕННЫЙ НАСТОЯЩИЙ
@olegshepsoriginal · 120,713
#23
подвал олега
@podval565 · 18,975
#24
Илья Ларионов
@larionovshow · 15,790
#25
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,674
#26
DARSI 🪄🧚‍♀️
@dsimakowa · 9,940
#27
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,487
#28
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,652
#29
Женевьева Шулик ⛦
@black13_moon · 2,285
#30
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,863
#31
Битва экстрасенсов - Дилаурентис
@dilawrentisss · 44,040
#32
Разумный Спойлер
@razuummm · 1,469
#33
Экстра Битва🔮
@extrabitva_official · 6,459
#34
битва колдунов - ЭКСТРАСЕНСЫ РЕВАНШ 3.🪐
@bitvakoldynov668 · 17,718
#35
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,096,347
#36
В комнате с сильнейшими🪄
@diegSheeev · 1,645
#37
ЕГОР КРИД
@egorkreed · 730,259
#38
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 924,923
#39
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 288,354
#40
Экстра-Сплетни
@ExtranewsBS · 1,196
#41
БАБСКАЯ КУРИЛКА
@kurilkabyma · 167
#42
🫂𝐞𝐥𝐤𝐬𝐬_𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐩𝐬𝐬🫂
@elkkinnss · 514 (as read 3 September 2026)
#43
Аня Ищук
@anyaischukkkk · 604,489
#44
𝐛𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐢
@bestremi · 1,389
#45
𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘃𝗲𝗲𝘃𝘅𝘃𝗶𝗯𝗲
@matveevxvibe · 1,976
#46
OKB News / Новости от Ок блогера
@okbnews · 189,050
#47
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,010
#48
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,499
#49
ЛЕОН КЕМСТАЧ
@iminlovewleo · 144,491
#50
ШАСТУН
@shastoonchannel · 229,866
#51
GEN Production
@genproductionru · 9,198
#52
Глеб три дня дождя
@everydayrain · 235,683
#53

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Череватый Влад || Official
@CherevatyiVlad · 241,801
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 August 2026
PEVCHAYA
@PEVCHAYAi · 28,072
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 4 September 2026
Райдотека
@raidoteka · 152,700
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
Надежда Шевченко
@mnogolikmagic · 28,503
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Лина Джебисашвили
@SulebiLinaOG · 29,337
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 7 September 2026
Lifedoctor Елизавета Петрова
@lifedoctor_petrova · 25,920
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 18 September 2026
Дима Матвеев
@matveev366oi · 66,499
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 August 2026
подвал олега
@podval565 · 18,975
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 October 2026
Марьяна Романова
@romanova_space · 24,863
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
УТРО. ТНТ
@utrotnt · 21,652
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 September 2026
Olga Yakubowitch
@thewitchlove · 34,010
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 2 September 2026
Виктория Райдос
@viktoriaraidosru · 47,917
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 26 August 2026
Артем Краснов
@valakhovred · 28,674
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДР ШЕПС
@alexandersheps · 92,487
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
Елена Голунова
@golunovachannel · 32,328
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 September 2026
Телеканал ТНТ
@TNT_television · 288,354
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elena Cherevata” (@elenacherevata), 33,448 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenacherevata.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.