Channel
@NutzenTelegram
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001638885743 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NutzenTelegram |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NutzenTelegram |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @NutzenTelegram/30 · this entry11 Jun 2023, 18:53 UTC | @KeinVergleichTelegram/1011 Jun 2023, 20:42 UTC | 1.00 | 1.8 hours |
| @KeinVergleichTelegram/1212 Jun 2023, 16:46 UTC | @NutzenTelegram/33 · this entry12 Jun 2023, 16:46 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @KeinVergleichTelegram/1428 Jun 2023, 10:54 UTC | @NutzenTelegram/36 · this entry28 Jun 2023, 10:54 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @NutzenTelegram/37 · this entry28 Jun 2023, 15:21 UTC | @KeinVergleichTelegram/1528 Jun 2023, 15:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @NutzenTelegram/39 · this entry1 Jul 2023, 19:22 UTC | @KeinVergleichTelegram/161 Jul 2023, 19:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @NutzenTelegram/50 · this entry29 Feb 2024, 09:56 UTC | @KeinVergleichTelegram/1829 Feb 2024, 10:18 UTC | 1.00 | 21 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @KeinVergleichTelegram | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–2) |
| @KanaleTelegramSuchen | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 June 2023 to 29 February 2024. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @NutzenTelegram — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 6 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 7 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 8 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 8 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 Minuten, die Ihr Leben auf Telegram FÜR IMMER verändern werden! Wir zeigen NUR EINIGE!!! der verfügbaren Funktionen, die TELEGRAM ZUM BESTEN SOCIAL WELTWEIT machen! (auch wenn die Leute das immer noch nicht verstehen 🤦♂️ ...) https://t.me/NoComparisonTelegram JA, TELEGRAM IST AUCH DAS BESTE SOCIAL FÜR WISSENSCHAFT! https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/212 Weitere Infos https://t.me/JoinShareableChatFolders/16 Mus…
Telegram @JoinShareableChatFolders für Dummies: a) Wir haben jetzt festgestellt, dass kein Premium Benutzer nicht mehr als 100 Kanäle sehen kann ... in diesem Fall können Sie beispielsweise unsere Liste mit maximal 100 Kanälen verwenden https://t.me/addlist/eaqHVCVl4lZlYTIx https://t.me/addlist/q0dAcDb0RSc5NmQx bis Telegram dieses Problem in gewisser Weise behebt ... b) Sie MÜSSEN NICHT allen Kanälen beitreten, wen…
Telegram steht für Tier-, Planeten- und Menschenrechte – Kanalliste https://t.me/RightsTelegram 🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx 🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx 🖇🤜https://t.me/addlist/l6ip-Sstsa8wZDIx 🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh 🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🖇🌍 https://t.me/addlist/PnM6poGtTtwwMzcx 🖇💡https://t.me/addlist/nTyay5rBWD5jNzJh
Oh Telegram, ... Wir haben jetzt gepostet, wie man mit 🧠 Sachen auf Kanäle suchen sollte https://t.me/grannouncements/334 weil diese Suche nicht so schlimm ist, auch wenn diese verbessert werden könnte ... ABER Das Suchen nach Kanälen ist einfach 💩. JA 💩, SCHEISSE, 💩! Beispiel wie Telegram OHNE SINN Kanäle anzeigt, die nicht was wir suchen entsprechen
☠️☠️Terrorism Facts☠️☠️
Wir haben bereits darüber gesprochen, dass Sie bei Telegram langsamer werden müssen. Schauen wir uns dieses Beispiel an, bei dem eine „i“ einen großen Unterschied macht, selbst wenn es am Anfang nur drei Ergebnisse gibt! Seien Sie klug, wenn Sie nach Kanälen suchen!
Die Suche auf Telegram ist und bleibt Scheiße! Benutzernamen können einfach nicht sichtbar sein. Auch wenn Sie Fragment Benutzernamen kaufen ... Dieses Problem tritt bei allen Arten von Themen und Sprachen auf. Nicht nur, weil @x nicht verfügbar ist und x auch nicht verfügbar ist, bedeutet jetzt, dass @x nicht existiert! Schreiben Sie @x in einen Chat und klicken Sie darauf!
Sticker, posted without a caption
Leute fragen, welches soziale Netzwerk sie nutzen sollen, da Reddit und WhatsApp/Meta immer offline sind, jetzt sogar Twitter (wo die Funktionen derzeit nur zu 0,1 % funktionieren). Die Antwort ist ziemlich einfach: Telegram ist fast nie offline, ist immer online! #Telegram #Twitter #Reddit #Whatsapp #Meta
Wir haben bereits auf @KanaleTelegramSuchen berichtet, dass Sie zum Suchen von Kanälen mindestens Telegram Stable / Beta und Telegram Desktop verwenden müssen. Ist das genug? Nein! Sie müssen sogar mehrere Telegram Desktop Apps verwenden, damit Sie unterschiedliche Ergebnisse sehen können! @StoriesTelegramFacts
Wie immer berichten Zeitungen, Fernsehen und Menschen nur die Hälfte von was zuvor gesagt wurde, indem sie die gesamte Mitteilung völlig ignorieren. Ja, das passiert auch im Jahr 2023!, wie z.B. Nachrichtenmedien, welche die Thematik WhatsApp vs. Telegram einfach ignoriert haben, was Pavel Durov bei der Veröffentlichung von Telegram Stories @StoriesTelegramFacts publiziert hat.
Überprüfen wir ✅ und nicht💩! Hier unsere Antwort auf das, was Italiener und andere über die letzte von Telegram implementierte Funktion schreiben. Kopiert Telegram wirklich WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram? Warum sprechen wir an dieser Stelle nicht über TikTok? Sind Stories auf Telegram etwas Neues? Sind Stories also wirklich so wichtig? usw. Unsere Antwort auf den Blödsinn, den die Leute schreiben, ohne die Fakten zu k…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NutzenTelegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram Deutsch 2.0 - Telegram wie nie zuvor: Fangen Sie an Telegram richtig zu nutzen” (@NutzenTelegram), 6 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NutzenTelegram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.