Channel
@NextStepOrg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001968621602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NextStepOrg |
| Description | Software Engineer & CTO Direct - @GadzhievIslam GitHub - https://github.com/MyNameIsNeXTSTEP/ YouTube - https://youtube.com/@islamgadzhiev LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/islam-gadzhiev-32b085375/ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NextStepOrg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 57 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 57 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (11 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 556 |
| Reactions total | 24 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
29 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 34.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 31.0% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 6.90% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.45% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 3.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Потому что я знаю какой я бы хотел видеть, и он точно в тысячу раз будет лучше всего того что есть) Если есть заинтересованные также как и я, дайте знать – я готов такую конфетку разработать, с free-версией плюс подписная версия
💯2
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
¡No puede ser! Я один не могу найти в Телеграмме нормального бота с веб-приложением для финансового учета ? Чтобы нормальное меню было, голосовые отправлять, PDF-генерация, Excel-генерация, статистика/отчеты, по email передавать их, в тг другим что-то слать, инвойсы например и т.д. 👀 Если да – дайте реакцию, пожалуйста. Если нет – дайте ссылки на нормальных ботов в ТГ; Потому что уже облазил достаточно, чтобы поня…
👍2🔥1
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Кому интересно – залетайте, можете стать международным ментором в своей нише бесплатно Меня уже туда закинули с основного getmentor, пока на модерации 👨💻
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
А сегодня у меня просто потрясающая новость!!! Я запускаю международную версию гетментора: openmentor.io! Те же принципы - никаких комиссий, бесплатные менторы (не все), фокус на помощи и коннекте людей, а не на прибылях. На платформе уже есть более 200 менторов, и я надеюсь что их станет еще больше очень скоро. Но для этого мне нужна ваша помощь. Поделитель плиз ссылкой на новый сервис у себя в соцсетях: https://…
👍1
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Microsoft просто гениален, как всегда. Зашёл в приложении Authentificator, выбираю вход через Microsoft. Он мне присылает код в это же приложение для подтверждения входа, которое я должен ввести. Но ввести не могу, потому что не могу войти в приложение, потому что не могу ввести код 😄
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
И снова супер интересный выпуск у Сурдина с Семихатовым - https://youtu.be/PyD8cMGsgj0?si=_hCsAB4gVJNtzNI2 Эта двойка, мне кажется, лучшая на просторах русскоязычного научно-популярного контента.
🔥2
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Мне предложили стать Proxy Interview Candidate – человеком, который якобы представляет команду агентства по разработке ПО. Типа чтобы завлекать клиентов опытом, со знанием английского языка (для USA рынка) и получать: за каждую встречу 30$/час (3-5 митов в неделю) + 20$ в неделю Сначала как мне объяснили и написали вообще про позицию на подработку, было написано: "Interview Specialist", и я подумал что ребята просто…
👍2🤔1
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Интересное из недавнего ⬇️
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Свыше 150gb просто было в docker образах 😯 Пришло время чистить… P.S. Просто детализацию на MacOS не увидеть по System Data, поэтому нужно отдельно все самому смотреть в системных папках распределение по памяти 😉
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Подгоняю вам мой сравнительный анализ текущих AI-coding моделей. В частности доступных в CursorAI 📝 Т.к. сам давно пользуясь Codex-5.3-medium и Sonnet-4.6-medium как основными моделями – я замечаю, что можно найти уже альтернативные решения по примерно схожей цене, но лучшему effort и code-quality, я вот решил все-таки разобраться что к чему 🖥 Главным источником выступал данный бенчмарк, в дополнение к этому актуал…
👍1🔥1
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Хостинг провайдер заблочил VPS, где крутилась приложенька... Взамен предложили создать новый сервис, но с потерей данных. Благо у меня там ничего критического и не хранилось. Теперь заново настраивать сервак 😕
🗿2
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Я только сейчас узнал, что оказывается, Antigravity IDE входит в подписку Google AI pro, которую я брал себе на год за копейки когда-то 😐 Вот ссылка на тот пост То есть выходит, можно для экономии иногда пользоваться им вместо CursorAI и практически за бесплатно 😆
💯1🔥1😁1
Signed Gadzhiev Islam
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @NextStepOrg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 381,610 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гаджиев Ислам | Next Step Dev” (@NextStepOrg), 57 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NextStepOrg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.