Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 747 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 91 days, net -71,874. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 12:19
83
+22
28 Oct 2026, 20:07
61
-8
21 Oct 2026, 20:08
69
+20
13 Oct 2026, 15:21
49
-67,370
9 Oct 2026, 15:16
67,419
-312
5 Oct 2026, 10:17
67,731
+283
29 Sept 2026, 10:21
67,448
-789
17 Sept 2026, 22:21
68,237
-159
15 Sept 2026, 18:38
68,396
-144
14 Sept 2026, 01:40
68,540
-151
12 Sept 2026, 08:59
68,691
-157
10 Sept 2026, 03:01
68,848
-251
6 Sept 2026, 19:59
69,099
-225
4 Sept 2026, 03:55
69,324
-91
2 Sept 2026, 17:58
69,415
-75
1 Sept 2026, 16:13
69,490
-89
31 Aug 2026, 15:25
69,579
-75
30 Aug 2026, 13:28
69,654
-88
29 Aug 2026, 16:58
69,742
-87
28 Aug 2026, 18:07
69,829
first reading
Engagement
1,203 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 1,203 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 October 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 28s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49,247 reactions across 825 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
17,932
36.4%
🤣
12,966
26.3%
❤
10,559
21.4%
🕊
1,964
3.99%
💋
1,603
3.26%
🍓
1,365
2.77%
🗿
590
1.20%
🤯
587
1.19%
👎
238
0.483%
🌚
156
0.317%
👏
147
0.298%
🤷♀
115
0.234%
🤓
113
0.229%
💅
92
0.187%
🥰
89
0.181%
😍
79
0.16%
🤔
69
0.14%
👀
59
0.12%
🤷♂
57
0.116%
💊
53
0.108%
29 further kinds
414
0.841%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 868 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌿 تاریانا چوب
جایی برای زیباییِ طبیعی چوب 🪵✨️
ما اینجاییم تا یه تیکه از طبیعت رو مهمون خونههاتون کنیم؛
با ظروف چوبی دستساز، طبیعی و خاص 🌱
نه برای تجمل،
نه برای قیمتهای عجیبوغریب؛
فقط برای اینکه زیباییِ چوب طبیعی، برای همه قابل دسترس باشه.🤎
تازه شروع کردیم و خوشحال میشیم جزو اولین همراههامون باشی.
https://t.me/Taryana_wood
ارسالی ناشناس:
سلام بی زحمت اینو دوباره میذارید که دوستان نظر بدن
نظرتون درباره رابطه داشتن با یک فرد نابینا چیه؟ حاضرید باهاش وارد رابطه بشید؟ و به نظرتون چه تفاوتی بین رابطه جنسی با یک فرد عادی و نابینا هست؟
@NazareToChie
#تبلیغ
فکر کن اونی که بهت یه خوبیای کرده جلوت وایساده، بیا اینجا یه جمله بهش بگو❤️:
@Gozar_admiin
[به ده نفر که خوشگلترین پیاما رو دادن نفری یه تومن هدیه داده میشه🔥]
ارسالی ناشناس:
سلام دخترم ۱۷
راستش خیلی خسته شدم از دست پدرم دست بزن داره و خیلی عصبانیه و داره خیانت میکنه و این کارو مامانم میبینه ولی بخاطر من داره تحمل میکنه و خودش هم مریضه نمیدونم چیکار کنم خودم از این موضوع خسته شدم چیکار کنم بنظرتون (امکان مشاوره رفتن ندارم)
لطفا راهنمایی کنید.
@NazareToChie
🦖 فقط یک بازی از میکست لوز شده؟ پولت برمیگرده!
میکس میبندی، هیجان بالا میره، اما یکی از انتخابهات خراب میشه؟
با پیشنهاد ویژه TrexBet، در صورت رعایت شرایط، میتونی ۱۰۰٪ مبلغ شرطت رو پس بگیری.
🦖 قوانین رو در سایت مطالعه کنید
🦖🦖🦖🦖
🦖 بونوس صدرصدی اولین واریز
🦖 واریز آسان، برداشت سریع
🦖 سرعت بالا، طراحی حرفه ای و تجربه ای متفاوت
TREXBET — PLAY. PREDICT. WIN.
https://TrexBet.com
T.me/TrexBet_Ir
ارسالی ناشناس:
سلام پسرم 21
نظرتون راجع به پسری که کوسه هست و ریشش در نمیاد چیه☹️
همه مدل روغن و دارو زدم و در نمیاد
نمیدونم چکار کنم
نگرانم بکارم و باز هم بریزه
@NazareToChie
درود رفقا
امیدوارم آخر هفته خوبی سپری کرده باشید
امروز موزیک جدید آپلود میکنم سعی کردم ایراداتی که دفعه قبل عده ای از دوستان گفتن از نظراتشون استفاده کنم و بهترش کنم.
خلاصه هر چی در توانم بود انجام دادم امیدوارم لذت ببرید❤️
🍓17❤3👏3💘2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,203 posts we hold for @NazareToChie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 9 posts on @NazareToChie as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 38 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بنظر شما تنهایی و تنها بودن یه موهبت یا یک ایراد و مشکل؟!
پسرم/ ایراد و مشکل10%
پسرم/ فرصت هست20%
دخترم/ ایراد و مشکل20%
دخترم/ فرصت هست51%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 18 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
21
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
21
vacant every time we have ever looked
@NazareToChie named 21 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@music_viby named in 2 posts, 5 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@tweet_challenge named in 2 posts, 5 October 2026 – 6 October 2026
@playlist_for_weekend named in 2 posts, 3 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
@cake_dokhy named in 2 posts, 2 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@linkinng named in 2 posts, 3 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@ertbat named in 2 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
@university_ir named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
@virtual_vpn_official named in 1 post, 9 October 2026 – 9 October 2026
@nahal_collection named in 1 post, 7 October 2026 – 7 October 2026
@jojo_land named in 1 post, 3 October 2026 – 3 October 2026
@kitty_bagii named in 1 post, 29 September 2026 – 29 September 2026
@bedardam_khord named in 1 post, 19 September 2026 – 19 September 2026
@blind_date_ named in 1 post, 15 September 2026 – 15 September 2026
@mijan_shop named in 1 post, 14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
@love_land_love_land named in 1 post, 14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
@screenfiricut named in 1 post, 8 September 2026 – 8 September 2026
@tajrobe_mardom named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@buisiness_linking named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@farsi_tweet named in 1 post, 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
@couple named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
@momentom named in 1 post, 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کامنتیو پلاس @ComentivePlus · 20,901 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
تاپ نیوز | Top News @Top_Nws · 42,750 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
روانشناسی زنان و مردان @Ravnshnas · 148,156 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐑 𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐒𝐈𝐑𝐈 @Amir_Tangsiri · 22,096 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NazareToChie” (@NazareToChie), 83 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NazareToChie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.