Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 69 days, net +65,532. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,543–139,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 01:06
129,905
+1,363
27 Oct 2026, 04:00
128,542
+2,174
26 Oct 2026, 07:06
126,368
+3,237
25 Oct 2026, 09:00
123,131
+1,342
24 Oct 2026, 10:36
121,789
+553
23 Oct 2026, 07:11
121,236
+992
22 Oct 2026, 04:17
120,244
+859
20 Oct 2026, 20:45
119,385
+583
19 Oct 2026, 21:27
118,802
+948
19 Oct 2026, 00:06
117,854
+941
18 Oct 2026, 02:27
116,913
+1,076
17 Oct 2026, 04:47
115,837
+973
16 Oct 2026, 07:36
114,864
+1,633
15 Oct 2026, 04:29
113,231
+1,740
14 Oct 2026, 02:11
111,491
+3,384
11 Oct 2026, 12:38
108,107
+6,439
7 Oct 2026, 00:40
101,668
+8,582
2 Oct 2026, 06:39
93,086
-8,828
18 Sept 2026, 16:19
101,914
+3,342
16 Sept 2026, 10:37
98,572
first reading
Engagement
433 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.22%
avg views ÷ 129,905 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,380
172 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
173
of 433 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held
433 (14 August 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total
1,613,280
Reactions total
18,743
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 20:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36m 22s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
39,518 reactions across 432 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
25,701
65.0%
👍
4,101
10.4%
💔
2,389
6.05%
👌
1,655
4.19%
😁
1,185
3.00%
👏
1,087
2.75%
😍
709
1.79%
💯
372
0.941%
⚡
361
0.914%
😢
357
0.903%
👎
315
0.797%
🏆
303
0.767%
🕊
261
0.66%
🆒
212
0.536%
🐳
207
0.524%
🗿
156
0.395%
🤯
139
0.352%
🎉
8
0.02%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 432 of the 433 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 433 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 432 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @gozar_med. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 433 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
همهی خونهها برای بچهها امن نیستن… 💔
ممکنه دعوا و خشونت توی یه خونه اونقدر زیاد شه که با تصمیم دادگاه، بچهها برای مدتی از خانوادهشون جدا میشن.
اما این بچهها قراره کجا برن؟
اینجاست که خانوادههای میزبان وارد قصه میشن؛ آدمهایی که خونه و دلشون رو برای یه مهمون کوچولو باز میکنن. ❤️
🎙️ توی این قسمت از گذر، از خشونت خانگی گفتیم و بچههایی که نباید توی ترس بزرگ بشن.
مورتون دویچ تو نظریه وابستگی اجتماعی، وقتی میخواد رفتار اجتماعی رو تحلیل کنه، به رابطه اهداف آدما با هم نگاه میکنه و میگه اهداف آدمها از هم مستقل نیستن و موفقیت و شکستشون بهم ربط داره.
این دقیقا نقطه مقابل اون باوریه که میگه هرکسی فقط مسئول زندگی خودشه. دویچ نشون میده که این باور یه سادهسازی اشتباهه چون در واقعیت ما در شبکهای از وابستگیهای متقابل زندگی میکنیم که معمولا دیده نمیشن.
موفقیت شغلی یه نفر نتیجه تلاش …
🏠 بچههایی که قرار نبود برای همیشه بمونن
سال ۲۰۲۵، درگیریهای کنگو بچههای زیادی رو از خانوادههاشون جدا کرد.
کالیمبزی، مردی از شهر گوما، در خونهاش رو به روی چهار کودک باز کرد؛ بچههایی که فقط تا پیدا شدن خانوادههاشون، به یه جای امن نیاز داشتن.
اون نمیتونست جنگ رو تموم کنه یا خانوادههاشون رو برگردونه، اما میتونست نذاره این بچهها روزهای انتظار رو تنها بگذرونن.
گاهی برای مراقبت از یه کودک، لازم نیست پدر یا ما…
اتفاقاً خیلی وقتا آدمای قویتر از ما بهمون مهربونی میکنن، چون برای ثابت کردن قدرتشون نیازی ندارن کسی رو ضعیف کنن. مهربونی همیشه از موضع ضعف نیست؛ از اینه که طرف اونقدر قوی و امنه که لازم نمیبینه با بقیه بجنگه تا قدرتشو ثابت کنه.
دو تا فرزند زیستی و هفت تا فرزند مهمان.
وقتی این عددها رو میشنوم، اولین چیزی که به ذهنم میرسه اینه که این تجربه چه شکلی بوده؟ هر بار که یه بچه وارد خونهشون شده، چه اتفاقی افتاده؟ و وقتی زمان رفتنش رسیده، چی گذشته؟
ما باهاشون نشستیم و حرف زدیم.
این شما و این روایت یک پدر از تجربهی میزبانی از فرزند مهمان. ❤️
تا حالا به این فکر کردی که یه بچه رو به سرپرستی بگیری؟
زیاد بهش فکر میکنم22%
کار قشنگیه ولی مطمئن نیستم31%
اگه شرایط داشتم حتما39%
نه ممنون20%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🍲 گرسنگی یه غریبه به من چه؟
سال ۲۰۰۲، نارایانان کریشنان، آشپز یک هتل لوکس در هند، آماده رفتن به سوئیس بود؛ تا اینکه مردی گرسنه را دید که از زبالهها غذا میخورد.
همین صحنه مسیر زندگیاش را عوض کرد. قید سفر را زد و تصمیم گرفت به بیخانمانها و نیازمندان غذا برساند؛ کاری که بعدها به شکلگیری مؤسسه خیریه آکشایا انجامید.
او نمیتوانست گرسنگی همه را برطرف کند، اما میتوانست برای عدهای کاری کند.
گاهی لازم نیست دنیا رو…
به نظرم “دلیل خوشحالی یکی دیگه بودن” افتخار خیلی بزرگیه.
👍166❤36🏆6😢4👎1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 433 posts we hold for @gozar_med. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@gozar_med edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 September 2026
Most recent edit
14 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
تا حالا به این فکر کردی که یه بچه رو به سرپرستی بگیری؟
زیاد بهش فکر میکنم22%
کار قشنگیه ولی مطمئن نیستم31%
اگه شرایط داشتم حتما39%
نه ممنون20%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 433 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گذر” (@gozar_med), 129,905 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gozar_med.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.