📺 آیا عیسای ناصری وجود خارجی داشت؟ — تحلیل متنشناختی دکتر ایگال بننون درباره رازهای عهد جدید (۲/۴) 🔹 زیستبوم آخرالزمانی و تب داغ مدعیان مسیحایی (بازه ۴ ق.م تا ۷۰ م) کل جریانهای شورشی و مدعیان نجاتبخش در یک بازه زمانی بسیار فشرده و حدوداً ۷۰ ساله (از مرگ هیرودیس بزرگ تا سقوط اورشلیم) رخ دادند. این منطقه به دلیل همزمانی سه بحران بزرگ به انبار باروت تبدیل شده بود: 1️⃣ بحران سیاسی-اقتصادی: مالیاتهای کمرشکن امپرات…

Channel
نقدآگین
@Naqdagin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
12,374subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001462578534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Naqdagin |
| Description | «حقیقت، خواستار نقد است؛ نه مدح» — بررسی پدیدارهای فرهنگی با رویکردی انتقادی 🔗 نقدآگين در پلتفرمها: t.me/Naqdagin/6435 👥 دعوت به مناظره در نقدآگین: t.me/Naqdagin/11747 📌پیشنهاد ترجمه، مقاله، مطلب: t.me/Naqdagin/15660 ⚡️توضیح ضروری: t.me/Naqdagin/6 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Naqdagin |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 12,374 | +8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 12,366 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 12,377 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 12,379 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 12,376 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 12,373 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 12,384 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 12,386 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 12,385 | first reading |
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.93%
- avg views ÷ 12,374 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 610
- 89 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 105
- of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (3 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 54,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,640
- Videos
- ≈3,350
- Links
- ≈8,930
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 23m 17s
- Average length
- 7m 46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
📺 آیا عیسای ناصری وجود خارجی داشت؟ — تحلیل متنشناختی دکتر ایگال بننون درباره رازهای عهد جدید (۱/۴) 🔸گزارش زیر، بر اساس سخنرانی علمی و ساختارشکنانه دکتر ایگال بننون (Dr. Yigal Bin-Nun)، مورخ و پژوهشگر کتاب مقدس است. 1️⃣ پیربط ساختاری و لایهنگاری متون مقدس: از معماری کتابت تا شالودهشکنی ترتیب کانونیک 🔸در تحلیل انتقادی-تاریخیِ پیدایش ادیان ابراهیمی، نخستین گام علمی، مواجهه با خودِ ظرف متنی و نحوهی گردآوری آن اس…
Sticker, posted without a caption
نقدآگین pinned «🌑 چرا ایرانیان داستایفسکی را بیش از همینگوی دوست دارند؟ ✍🏻#سینا_جهاندیده 📖 شاید تفاوت اصلی میان دو نویسندهای مانند داستایفسکی و همینگوی را بتوان در نوع اطلاعاتی دانست که در اختیار خواننده قرار میدهند. در آثار داستایفسکی شخصیتها پیوسته دربارۀ اندیشهها،…»
📘تلگرام؛ جبرئیلِ نازلشده بر گوشیهای ما ✍🏻#محمود_کریمی نامِ دوروف نامِ جمله انبیاست؛ چون که صد آمد، نود هم پیش ماست! 😅 🔻پاول دوروف در کانال شخصی خود نوشت: «امروز تلگرام سیزدهمین سالگرد تأسیس خود را جشن میگیرد. در بیش از نیمی از این مسیر (۷.۵ سال گذشته)، تلگرام همواره یکی از ۱۰ اپلیکیشن محبوب و پرطرفدار جهان بوده است. یک نسل کامل با این پیامرسان بزرگ شده است. 💪 تولدت مبارک، تلگرام!» 🚀 معجزهٔ پیامرسانِ محبوبِ ا…
Sticker, posted without a caption
نقدآگین pinned «📺 فکر میکردم در حالِ تحصیلِ ادبیاتم، اشتباه میکردم! —چگونه ووکیزم دانشگاههای برتر و صنعت نشر را نابود کرد؟ 🔸 این ویدیو مصاحبهای است با لیسا لایز (Lisa Liez)، نویسنده خبرنامه Substack با عنوان Pens and Poison و فارغالتحصیل رشته ادبیات انگلیسی از دانشگاه…»
📖 جمهوری اسلامی در آیینه چند شاخص ⚫️جمهوری اسلامی از همان نخستین سالهای استقرار خود، حکومت خویش را نه صرفاً نظمی سیاسی، بلکه طرحی برای برپایی جامعهای عادلانهتر معرفی میکرد؛ جامعهای که قرار بود در آن فاصله طبقاتی کاهش یابد، ثروت عمومی از انحصار گروهی کوچک خارج شود، محرومان به حقوق ازدسترفته خود برسند و دولت، برخلاف آنچه حکومت پیشین به آن متهم بود، منابع کشور را در خدمت زندگی عمومی قرار دهد. نزدیک به نیم قرن از …
📺 چگونه یهودیان باستان تاریخ را بازنویسی کردند؟ — برپایۀ پژوهشهای راسل گمیرکین، فیلیپ واژینبوم و نیل گادفر (۲/۲) 🔸طبقه کاهنان و نخبگان یهودی که در اسکندریه تحت آموزشهای سیستماتیک یونانی (آموزش آثار هومر، هسیود، هرودوت، و افلاطون) قرار گرفته بودند، آگاهانه دست به خلق یک «آرمانشهر ادبی و مذهبی» به نام «اسرائیل» زدند. آنها با بهرهگیری از منابع کتابخانه اسکندریه و سنت نگارش یونانی، متون پراکنده بومی را بازنویسی کردن…
📺 چگونه یهودیان باستان تاریخ را بازنویسی کردند؟ — برپایۀ پژوهشهای راسل گمیرکین، فیلیپ واژینبوم و نیل گادفر (۱/۲) 1️⃣ پیوند اساطیر یونان و بینالنهرین در بازسازی تبارشناختی کتابمقدس 🌊 داستانهای نخستین سفر پیدایش—از مستی نوح و گناه حام گرفته تا ماجرای لوط و دخترانش—در بستر سنتی سنجیده شدهاند که هدف آن ارائه یک تبارشناسی ساختارمند برای اقوام کهن بوده است. ماجرای عریاننمایی نوح توسط حام (Ham) و نفرینِ فرزندش کنعان …
Sticker, posted without a caption
▪️ ذاکر نایک، «جادوگر معجزات علمی» 🎬 قسمتِ دوم 🔗 قسمتِ اول 🔸در این ویدیو، #شریف_جابر ادعاهای ذاکر نایک درباره «اعجاز علمی» را زیر ذرهبین میبرد. او تلاش میکند نشان دهد که بسیاری از این استدلالها بر پایۀ تفسیرهای جهتدار، بازی با واژهها و سوءاستفاده از ناآگاهی مخاطب نسبت به علم و زبان عربی ساخته شدهاند. 🔸جابر همینطور نایک را متهم میکند که برای تأیید باورهای خود، متون دینی را به ابزاری برای اثبات نظریههای عل…
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @Naqdagin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Naqdagin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 344,784 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Naqdagin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نقدآگین” (@Naqdagin), 12,374 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Naqdagin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.