Channel
@thedelcopatriot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
663subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001380384002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thedelcopatriot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thedelcopatriot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 663 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 664 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,640 |
| Reactions total | 86 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
129 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 31.0% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 27.9% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 17.8% | |
| 🤯 | 17 | 13.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
DO NOT LISTEN TO THEM.YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE The work wasn't done in a vacuum. This investigation became a true community effort. Delaware County residents spent months reviewing public records, filing Right-to-Know requests, mapping business relationships, documenting municipal liens, examining Department of Health records, and asking difficult questions. Independent journalists also continued reporting on the…
👍5
The people screaming "No Kings" are the same people who spent years demanding Americans obey unelected bureaucrats without question. They defended censorship, applauded mandates, accepted government deciding who was "essential," and cheered while people lost their jobs, businesses, and access to society over private medical decisions. They mocked doctors who challenged prevailing policies, dismissed informed consent,…
🔥5👍1
In my opinion, for the last six years, I've been called just about every name imaginable by government officials, political operatives, and the media. I've been labeled a seditionist, an insurrectionist, a terrorist, a racist, an antisemite, frivolous, and crazy. I've received hate mail, death threats, disgusting voicemails, and have been defamed on a national stage. My son became a target simply because I exercised …
❤10
For six years, I've watched ordinary Americans sacrifice everything to expose the truth only to have others take the credit, build the brands, and profit from their work. This isn't about jealousy. It's about protecting the people who built the evidence, preserving investigations, and telling the real history of the grassroots movement. History won't remember the promoters, and personalities... It will remember w…
❤4👍1
Leah Hoopes The Delco Patriot pinned a video
Follow-Up: The Cover-Up Is in the Redactions Delaware County and Duane Morris have a serious credibility problem, and their own records prove it. In 2024, they produced billing records that contained factual descriptions of election administration, Right-to-Know requests, ballot issues, records retention, and other governmental activities. Those records documented the very issues Gregory Stenstrom and I were public…
❤5👍2
Then something changed. Internal County emails now reveal that the Right-to-Know Officer asked Duane Morris: > "Would you like to check the already redacted ones and see if you would like to add any redactions..." Duane Morris responded with one word: > "Yes." Think about that. The law firm whose invoices were being requested was allowed to decide whether more information should be hidden from the public. But …
👏1
To: Lee Awbrey, Solicitor Delaware County Solicitor's Office Mrs. Awbrey, Please accept this correspondence as a formal preservation demand regarding all records relating to Delaware County, et al. v. Gregory Stenstrom and Leah Hoopes, the County's handling of Pennsylvania Right-to-Know requests concerning that litigation, and the participation of Raymond McGarry in communications relating to the matter. Through r…
👍6
Delaware County has a continuing obligation to preserve all potentially relevant evidence, including electronically stored information. This includes emails, text messages, Microsoft Teams communications, handwritten notes, memoranda, calendars, mobile devices, cloud storage, server logs, backup media, metadata, and any other records within the possession, custody, or control of the County or its agents. Please ensu…
👍4🙏1
Applies only in specific circumstances involving bribery or kickback schemes. Ethics / Professional Responsibility (Non-Criminal) Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct: Rule 1.7 – Conflict of Interest Rule 1.9 – Duties to Former Clients Rule 3.3 – Candor Toward the Tribunal Rule 3.4 – Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel Rule 3.7 – Lawyer as Witness Rule 8.4 – Professional Misconduct Respectfully, Le…
❤4👍2
https://open.substack.com/pub/delcopatriot2020/p/why-was-a-judicial-candidate-copied?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=24vfjx
🤯2
🚨 NEW INVESTIGATION 🚨 For nearly six years, Gregory Stenstrom and I and other great Patriots have been investigating Delaware County. We testified under oath. We submitted disclosures to the DOJ. We filed Right-to-Know requests. We defended ourselves pro se and defeated two defamation lawsuits. Then Delaware County hired one of the largest law firms in the country and sued us. Most people know about the lawsuit.…
❤7👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thedelcopatriot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 849,149 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Leah Hoopes The Delco Patriot” (@thedelcopatriot), 663 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thedelcopatriot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.