Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net +576. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,635–30,386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:16
30,299
+79
15 Sept 2026, 13:58
30,220
+47
13 Sept 2026, 21:56
30,173
+30
12 Sept 2026, 03:15
30,143
+42
9 Sept 2026, 19:40
30,101
+48
6 Sept 2026, 09:56
30,053
+25
4 Sept 2026, 04:37
30,028
+7
2 Sept 2026, 19:28
30,021
+33
1 Sept 2026, 16:27
29,988
+20
31 Aug 2026, 17:04
29,968
+30
30 Aug 2026, 18:53
29,938
-4
29 Aug 2026, 18:14
29,942
+16
28 Aug 2026, 18:25
29,926
+8
27 Aug 2026, 19:14
29,918
+29
26 Aug 2026, 20:56
29,889
-8
25 Aug 2026, 18:39
29,897
-10
24 Aug 2026, 20:26
29,907
+14
23 Aug 2026, 05:17
29,893
+4
21 Aug 2026, 20:18
29,889
+14
20 Aug 2026, 16:36
29,875
first reading
Engagement
340 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 30,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,280
160 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
160
of 340 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 159 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
340 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
524,606
Reactions total
20,521
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,330
Videos
≈1,650
Links
≈4,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46,837 reactions across 339 posts, in 60 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
24,490
52.3%
👍
5,489
11.7%
🔥
3,959
8.45%
❤
3,569
7.62%
❤🔥
1,435
3.06%
🤯
1,410
3.01%
😭
1,087
2.32%
👎
868
1.85%
🫡
661
1.41%
💔
505
1.08%
🥰
454
0.969%
😐
451
0.963%
🆒
437
0.933%
🍌
325
0.694%
⚡
234
0.5%
☃
189
0.404%
🤷♂
139
0.297%
🤔
129
0.275%
😢
126
0.269%
😱
119
0.254%
40 further kinds
761
1.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 339 of the 340 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,837 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 340 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 340 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Minecraft_DL. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 340 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📕 ] سومین ماینکرفت لایو ۲۰۲۶؛ معرفی بایوم غارهای یخی و دایمنشن جدید سیفت
🔷بایوم غارهای یخی (Ice Cave) جدیدترین بایوم غاری و زیر زمینی سرد است که در زیر بایومهای زمستانی ایجاد میشود. این بایوم از مقادیر زیادی از یخ و بلاکهای سفید رنگ کلسیت تشکیل شده است. تمامی سطوح بایوم با انواع یخ پوشانده شده و ستونهای یخ در مرکز و دیوارهها قرار دارند. ترکیب تاریکی و روشنایی به عنوان جلوه بصری این بایوم به شمار میرود. وج…
اینم برای دوستانی که اخبار ماینکرفت دانجنز ۲ رو دنبال نکردن و نمیدونن سیفت چه شکلیه؛ این شکلیه 🤩
▶️در این تیزر میتونید یکی دیگه از مابهای ناشناس بُعد سیفت رو ببینید که ممکنه به ماینکرفت اصلی راه پیدا کنه.
▶️اون ماب آبی رنگ هم بلاب (BLUB) نام داره که به عنوان نماد سیفت به شمار میره.
🟦#News [👤#APOLON ]
🟦 @DLMinecraft | DLMinecraft.ir
🌊 و حالا ما اینجاییم؛ بعد از ۱۴ سال، ماینکرفت قراره بُعد سیفت رو دریافت کنه و داستان انشنت سیتی رو کامل کنه.
🔷موجانگ رسماً اعلام کرده که بُعد جدید سیفت در سال ۲۰۲۷ و در قالب یک بهروزرسانی بزرگ به ماینکرفت اضافه میشه.
🔷تا اون موقع، قراره کلی خبر و اطلاعات جدید از این بُعد منتشر بشه و کمکم تا زمان عرضه، با تمام جزئیاتش آشنا بشیم.
🔷موجانگ همچنین روند انتشار آپدیتهای ماینکرفت رو بازطراحی کرده؛ به این شکل که در کنار…
آشنایی با مکانیک فریز؛ پوشن و افکت جدید 💎
📈 زامبیهای فروزن با شکست خوردن، آیس بال را بهعنوان لوت دراپ میکنند
📈 آیس بال یکی از مواد لازم برای ساخت پوشن جدید فریز است
📈 این پوشن افکت جدید فریز را روی هدف اعمال میکند؛ یعنی سرعت انتیتی متقابل را کاهش داده و بهصورت مداوم به آن دمیج میزند
🚩 #ماینکرفتلایو
🟦#News [👤#APOLON ]
🟦 @DLMinecraft | DLMinecraft.ir
نگاهی به واریانت جدید زامبی؛ فروزن زامبی! 🧟🗑️
📈 گونهای جدید از زامبیها به نام «فروزن زامبی» در بایوم جدید غارهای یخی اسپاون میشود.
📈 از راه دور با پرتابه جدید «آیس بال» حمله میکند و میزان دمیج آن بر اساس سرعت پرتابه تعیین میشود. در نبرد تنبهتن نیز افکت جدید «فریز» را روی بازیکن اعمال میکند
📈 هنگام کشته شدن، آیسبال دراپ میکند که میتوان از آن برای ساخت یک پوشن جدید استفاده کرد.
+ نکته: اسمش هنوز تایید نش…
نگاهی به بایوم زیر زمینی جدید ماینکرفت؛ غارهای یخی ❄️
📈 تشکیل شده از بلاکهای یخی، کلسایت، استالاکتیت یخ و کریستالهای یخ.
📈 استالاکتیتهای یخی در صورت نزدیک بودن به منابع نوری مانند ترچ، ذوب شده و سقوط میکنند.
📈 ماب جدید زامبی فروزن و استری به عنوان مابهای محلی در این بایوم حضور دارند.
📈 کریستالهای یخ یک بلاک تزیینی جدید هستند که به طور طبیعی در غارهای یخی رشد میکنند.
🚩 #ماینکرفتلایو
🟦#News [👤#APOLON ]
🟦 …
غارهای یخی در راه ماینکرفت! 💙
◀️ در زیر بایومهای سرد به کاوش بپردازید تا غارهای یخی را پیدا کنید. این غارها منبعی غنی از سنگ معدن و سرشار از زیبایی و خطرات عجیبوغریب هستند، مثل زامبیهای یخزده. آنها را شکست دهید تا توپهای یخی به دست آورید یا خودتان یخ بزنید!
🚩 #ماینکرفتلایو
🟦#News [👤#APOLON ]
🟦 @DLMinecraft | DLMinecraft.ir
[ ✅ ] نگاهی به سیفت؛ بعد چهارم و مرموز جهان ماینکرفت در بازی ماینکرفت دانجنز ۲
🗓 عرضه در ۲۹ سپتامبر
🚩 #ماینکرفتلایو
🟦#News [👤#APOLON ]
🟦 @DLMinecraft | DLMinecraft.ir
Showing the 12 most recent of 340 posts we hold for @Minecraft_DL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Minecraft_DL edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
2
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Minecraft_DL named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@at_mine124 named in 2 posts, 23 August 2026 – 24 August 2026 · confirmed gone 30 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@mc_dragpnsmp named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Games DL - گیمز دی ال - GTA VI @Games_dl · 90,426 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
GAME NEWS | اخبار گیم @GAME_NEWS_GM · 110,868 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026
رسول کرفت @rasoulmz1 · 39,023 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 30 August 2026
Perfect bazi @perfectbazi · 79,363 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
GameeRoid | گیمی روید @GameeRoid · 85,648 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 August 2026
YanFLEX - Майнкрафт | Minecraft @mcflex · 26,420 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 September 2026
🍃🌸 بهار نارنج 🌸🍃 @Salamat1000 · 21,787 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
MEMENTO STUDIOS @MEMENTOSTUDIOS · 126,109 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
Ravin Fard Music 🎤🎸 @ravinfard · 39,579 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ماینکرافت | دی ال ماینکرفت | Minecraft DL 🌙” (@Minecraft_DL), 30,299 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Minecraft_DL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.