Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة || م أ

Channel

قناة || م أ

@MaherAmeer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,428subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001389038203
TypeChannel
Username@MaherAmeer
Created8 April 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MaherAmeer

Growth

9,4289,4429,4356 August 2026 — 9,442 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,435 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,430 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,428 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,426–9,444 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:369,428-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:529,430-5
7 Aug 2026, 05:109,435-7
6 Aug 2026, 05:499,442first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.9%
avg views ÷ 9,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held17 (24 June 20262 August 2026)
Views total9,400
Reactions total118
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
193
Videos
8
Links
272

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

420 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16539.3%
🥰10324.5%
😢6315.0%
🔥5312.6%
🫡215.00%
😐102.38%
🤯30.714%
🤔20.476%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈1,840 views32 reactionsread 15 August 2026

‏لماذا تعلُّمُ العربية وآداب العرب؟ لتنقلب من مادة ورقية يكتب فيها المستعمر ما يشاء... إلى أخرى معدنية صلدة تسري فيها كهرباء القرءان فتَنشَطُ بها وتَصعق... #إعادة_نشر_٢٠١٨

🥰19👍8🔥4🫡1

1 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈2,630 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026

مما يضحكني من أمر بعض الملاحدة... أني وسمتهم منذ سنوات على خراطيمهم، فما برحوا يتحسسون ندوب ذلك الوسم، وما زالت تلك الوقائع العشوائية تدور في مجالسهم... فيبلغني أنهم يدوكون في علة ظهوري عليهم: أكان لقدرة خطابية، أم اقتناصا لزلل أو عثرة، أم اغتناما لضعفٍ أولي تجاوزوه؟ مع تضمن كل ذلك: أنهم دُهسوا... وربما اختلقوا حادثة لم تقع، أو رووا أمرًا على غير وجهه، ليجعلوا الغلبة عارضا لا يتكرر، والضعف حالا قد زالت.... حتى أنه يب

🥰27🔥14👍4🫡2

28 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,600 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[ما جاز لواجب الوجود وجب له] . "يجب أن يكون في الحياة حياة بالذات، وفي الإرادة إرادة بالذات، وفي الاختيار اختيارٌ بالذات، حتى تكون هذه في شيء لا بالذات". الفارابي . "هو واجب الوجود من جميع جهاته" ابن سينا . "لأنه إذا اقتضى واجب الوجود الأخس؛ فلا جهة أخرى فيه تقتضي الأشرف، والممكن لا يلزم من فرض وجوده محال، فإذا انقرض الممكن الأشرف؛ فيستدعي أن يقتضيه جهة تعقل أشرف من واجب الوجود، وهو محال." "كل شيء حكم العقل أنه كمال

🔥13👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,330 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026

يقولون إن ابن تيمية يهدم ولا يبني ما رأيك ؟ - إن لم تكن لابن تيمية إلا ميزة واحدة، فهي أنه بنى نظامًا مترابطا من الجهة المعرفية واللغوية واللاهوتية والنقلية، بعدما كان الطرح قبله عند أهل الحديث شذريا يكتفي بالتخطئة والتصويب من الجهة النقلية بشكل رئيس -وهو كاف واف يَحطِمُ ما ناوءه- ثم العقلية بشكلٍ أندر، كيف ولابن تيمية بناءات كثيرة. فقائل هذا لا يفهم بناءً ولا هدمًا غالبًا، ولا أعيِّن أحدًا إذ سمعت هذه الدعوى من فسائ

👍16🫡5🤔2🥰2

14 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC≈4,510 views31 reactionsread 15 August 2026

مع احترامي لكل مختصر... إلا أني شخصيا لا أحترم المختصرات... إلا أن تكون تمتينا أو ما يقاربه... أو تخليصا للصحيح من الأحاديث... أو مدعمة بالتحشية والإضافة الموضوعية للملخص... ما عداه فقراءة لما استحسنه قارئ قبلك بذوقه لا أكثر... وهي مرتبة دنيا تصد عن الكتاب الأصل... لا سيما مع ما في الاختصار من مظنة خزل الفكرة وبتر السياق...

👍25🔥6

14 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC≈2,770 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @tr728Photo

درء التعارض مبناه على مناقشة المعارضات العقلية لدلالات النصوص العقدية اختصاره في مجلد لطيف بعيد عن هذه الأبحاث من إخراج الكتاب عن مقصده، وحقيقته مجرد انتخاب بعض الفوائد وليس اختصارا ولا تقريبا حقيقيا. وابن تيمية كتبه الواضحة لعموم طلبة العلم عديدة فلا إضافة كبيرة في مثل هذا العمل. الكتاب متخصص له من يناسبه ومن أراد الاشتغال به يترقى إليه ولا يصلح السعي بالنزول بمادة الكتاب بما يخرجه عن مقصده. وليس من الضروري لكل طال

👍25🥰5

11 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC≈3,600 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026

كل ما تمر به الآن سيبقى أو يتكرر... والنوم غيبوبتك المؤقتة الوحيدة أو تأجيلٌ فاشل للمواجهة... ودعك من "ملحمة" شأنك... فمثلك كثر ولا مميز عندك... ابلع المنشور بهدوء وأكمل تمثيليتك مع بقية الفريق على المسرح دون إزعاج وجودي... #إعادة_نشر

😢25🥰10🫡6👍5🔥2😐1

8 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC≈5,240 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[حين غلبت الروم- مقامرة عبثية أم نبوءة سماوية] . وهذه آية من آيات النبوة في الكتاب، جرى ذكرها قبل أن يقع أمرها، وانقضى على ما أخبرت به بعد أعوام عدة، فجاءت مطابقة للواقع، شاهدة على صدق المُخبِر. وليس لمن رام دفعها سبيل إلا أن يسلك واحدًا من أربعة مسالك: أحدها: المنازعة في مدلولها اللغوي، فيجتهد أن يجعل عبارتها لا تحتمل ذلك المعنى الذي جرى به التفسير، ولا تشهد له العربية بشاهد ولا تؤيده عادة الخطاب، ولن نبحث هذا وإن ح

🥰11👍6🔥1😢1

6 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC≈3,790 views16 reactionsread 15 August 2026

بلغني أن بعضهم تشنج وسمى هذا الكلام خطابة... المشكلة أنه خطابة فعلا... بعضهم "لُسِع" دماغه فصار لا يبحث في أي كلام إلا عن البناء المنطقي والترتيب المقدماتي ليكون الكلام مفيدا... ويحسب كل إنسان يتكلم ببرهان الشفا فيحاكمه إليه... الكلام وعظي... ينبه لأهمية الاعتصام بالله... وأن من طغى في الأسباب... وإن كان السبب "تعصم مراعاته الذهن عن الخطأ"... فإن الله يخذله فلا "يراعي" ويقع فيما يتنزه عنه الإنسان المؤمن العادي المستس

🥰12👍3🤯1

6 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC≈2,930 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

براين جونسون الذي اشتهر بطلب الخلود والالتزام الصحي والكشفي الصارم أصيب بمرض مناعي مزمن لا علاج له... وربما نجى منه... لكن تبقى المفارقة ظاهرة وتنبه لعجز الإنسان كيفما اتجه ومهما احتاط... ومما أظنه سنة لله... أنه ما طغى أحد في طلب العصمة بغيره من دونه إلا وعوقب بضد قصده... وصار مثالا لكل من هو من جنسه وإن لم يعاقب الجميع... ومن ذلك الطغيان في المنطق الذي هو آلة تعصم مراعاتها الذهن عن الخطأ في التفكير... ثم تجد في رؤو

👍17😢2

5 Jul 2026, 23:31 UTC≈2,640 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

من يرى أن آية فاتتني في هذا الباب فليذكرها... وليبحث في المقال قبل أن يقترحها

👍16🔥1🥰1

5 Jul 2026, 23:31 UTC≈2,610 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[دفاع القرءان عن النبي- نقدٌ وموازنة لشكوك الأوائل والأواخر] https://maher-ameer.blogspot.com/2025/11/blog-post.html

👍7🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MaherAmeer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,369 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة || م أ” (@MaherAmeer), 9,428 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MaherAmeer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.