
Channel
REVIVE Law:Judge Exam Forum
@ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,490subscribers
+91 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001510124454 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 2,490 | +6 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:05 | 2,484 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 2,484 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 2,475 | +14 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 2,461 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:28 | 2,449 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 2,437 | +17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 2,420 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 2,412 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 2,403 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 2,399 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LawPrepJudiciary · 23,837
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
@GKTrick02 · 229,932
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@uppcsexamnotes · 57,784
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
@JudiciaryGold · 33,120
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
@theshubhamsir · 29,316
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REVIVE Law:Judge Exam Forum” (@ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ), 2,490 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ReviveHigherJudiciaryADJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.