Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

KetKAT 18+

@KetKAT0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

298subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002120611187
TypeChannel
Username@KetKAT0
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KetKAT0

Growth

2962982976 August 2026 — 296 subscribers6 August 2026 — 296 subscribers13 August 2026 — 298 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 296–298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:04298+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:47296no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:35296first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.6%
avg views ÷ 298 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (15 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,850
Reactions total600
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

600 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19833.0%
custom 51994412719989164169916.5%
custom 52176884491459131648914.8%
custom 52355313582011990518514.2%
custom 5240053065410686459376.17%
❤‍🔥335.50%
custom 5199499060783882976264.33%
custom 5366148735376061173193.17%
🥰91.50%
🔥30.5%
🍌10.167%
🍓10.167%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KetKAT0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC77 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как много августовских котят оказывается😳

🥰9custom 51994990607838829761

6 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC63 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ca1iren_artPhoto

С днем рождения меня! Начался он со слез, но надеюсь,что днём будет лучше 🥰 Родители все-таки заказали мне планшет, который я так выпрашивала (правда не тот, который я хотела, ну ладно) А и кстати, мне исполнилось 16 лет ;3 Буду рада репостам и реакциям 🐹 @Tiramisunya_la , спасибо за звезды

17custom 51994412719989164168custom 52355313582011990513

31 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC229 views97 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня день рождение у одного близкого для меня человека. Ради нее я пересилила себя и постаралась вложить все силы в эту нежную работу🤩 Подарок уже был вручен заранее, но поздравить хочу сегодня. С днем рождения, милая🤩

custom 51994412719989164165027❤‍🔥18custom 51994990607838829762

30 Jul 2026, 10:17 UTC168 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @shzhivinciPhoto

🤩🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🤩 ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀Аудитории ≈12к Условия подписка по желанию на ⠀🌟Винчи ⠀⠀✨elynas ⠀⠀⠀✨Пятуч репост в тгк который пиарите скинуть юз и один арт под этот пост репостим понравившихся ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ 🤩 30.07🌟31.07 🤩 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀🎀🎀🎀

custom 519944127199891641612🔥32

29 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC226 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ⚫️⚫️⚪️⚫️⚪️⚫️⚪️⚪️⚪️⚪️ ⚫️⚫️⚪️⚪️ ʍы оᴛᴋᴩыᴧи 🖤🖤личных дᴇᴧ. обᴄᴧᴇдоʙᴀᴧи 🖤🖤 дуɯ, нᴇ уᴧоʙиʙ 🖤. ниᴋоʍу нᴇ ᴨоᴄᴛᴀʙиᴧи диᴀᴦноз, но зᴀᴛо нᴀᴩиᴄоʙᴀᴧи 🖤🖤 ᴋᴩуᴛых ᴨᴇᴩᴄонᴀжᴇй ⚫️ ᴨᴄихиᴋᴀ — ɯᴛуᴋᴀ ᴄᴧожнᴀя, но ᴋоᴦдᴀ ᴇё ᴩиᴄуюᴛ, онᴀ ᴄᴛᴀноʙиᴛᴄя ᴨоняᴛнᴇᴇ. и ᴋᴩᴀᴄиʙᴇᴇ ⚪️ нижᴇ ᴨᴩᴇдᴄᴛᴀʙᴧᴇны ᴀʙᴛоᴩы ᴩᴀбоᴛ: ⚪️⚪️ 1. @reineyx 2. @youroffdevil 3. @Shima_Muha 4. @wpleids 5. @elinrein 6. @podmattress 7. @tugfj4 8. @yacaciavcergaacia 9. @art

23custom 523553135820119905116custom 524005306541068645911❤‍🔥1🍓1

25 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC575 views87 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня день рождение у одной прекрасной рыбки С праздником!🤩

custom 523553135820119905147custom 536614873537606117319custom 519944127199891641615❤‍🔥41custom 52176884491459131641

21 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC420 views114 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я совершенно не умею рисовать девушек и милых мальчиков, но моя подруга большая поклонница каламбины и очень хотела себе арт от меня на заставку планшета. По этому я очень стараюсь над этой работой. Когда закончу, возьмусь за изучение милых личиков. Для меня это заблудший лес😔 У меня тут вообще есть поклонники фембоев и девушек?😅

57custom 521768844914591316430custom 519949906078388297621custom 51994412719989164165❤‍🔥1

16 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC469 views112 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

😍🤣🙂😆😌🙃😇 🙃🥰😊🤣😋🙂🤣☺️😀 Бесконечное стремление к идеалу. Дотошный перфекционизм. Постоянное совершенствование. Он есть совершенство. Именно он сковал себя золотыми нитями, состоящими из страха быть непризнанным и удушающей тревоги стать непонятым #психология_души_ивент

53custom 521768844914591316430custom 524005306541068645922❤‍🔥4custom 51994990607838829762🍌1

15 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC287 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мне нарисовали Налу!

custom 5235531358201199051194custom 52400530654106864593

15 Jul 2026, 17:53 UTC336 views57 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @cappycooPhoto

Красивый мальчишка для @KetKAT0

custom 52176884491459131642814custom 51994412719989164169❤‍🔥5custom 52400530654106864591

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @KetKAT0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 163,928 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KetKAT 18+” (@KetKAT0), 298 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KetKAT0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.