Channel
@frankkk779
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
182subscribers
+85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002423131683 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @frankkk779 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/frankkk779 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:28 | 182 | +85 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 | 97 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 97 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (17 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,109 |
| Reactions total | 244 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
244 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352768031053325270 | 92 | 37.7% | |
| custom 5372970612320907266 | 61 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5190830785988410164 | 54 | 22.1% | |
| custom 5330062351435597301 | 37 | 15.2% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @frankkk779. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
смотрите какого адоптика нарисовала во время ивента аук на парнишу: нач: 200 мин: 30 авто: 1500 правил нет оплата на озон банк или райффайзен окончания через 48 часов ппс или досрочно
custom 51908307859884101641custom 53527680310533252701custom 53729706123209072661
Signed ᅠᅠ
буду очень рада увидеть ответы и узнать как вы видите мои арты и в целом канал 💫
custom 535276803105332527010custom 51908307859884101644custom 53729706123209072664
Signed ᅠᅠ
🌟🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🌟 сегодня ассистентка, ведущая рубрику #background_day, прибежала чтобы показать вам секретные файлы! самые первые прототипы персонажей... особенно-интересный факт заключается в том, что некоторые из них были созданы даже без предварительных раздумий. творческий процесс начался в момент открытия онлайн-мейкера и просмотра всех доступных деталей оформления. казалось бы – довольно ограниченный круг возможнос…
custom 537297061232090726610custom 53527680310533252706custom 51908307859884101645
Signed ᅠᅠ
ПО МНОГОЧИСЛЕННЫМ ПРОСЬБАМ - НОВАЯ, ТРЕТЬЯ ВОЛНА ПАПКО-ДВИЖА! Напоминаю, что это флешмоб, в рамках которого художники объединяются в папки и всячески помогают друг другу в продвижении (что в нынешние времена ОСОБЕННО важно и нужно!). В прошлых волнах нашего флэшмоба суммарно приняло участие уже больше ПЯТИ ТЫСЯЧ человек, за что ещё раз колоссальное спасибо как самим художникам, так и тем, кто просто решил так или ин…
custom 53527680310533252702
Signed ᅠᅠ
опять папочки. я участвую в этой - https://t.me/addlist/TPKtRWtxj-RjNTZi срок действия ссылки ограничен
custom 53729706123209072662
Signed ᅠᅠ
спасибо за этот ивент и вот мой артик на него. снова акли позирует
custom 535276803105332527017custom 51908307859884101648custom 53729706123209072665
Signed ᅠᅠ
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔣🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Вот и подошёл к концу летний ивент по палитрам! Наконец мы смогли преодолеть данный путь, который принёс невероятно много плодов... Работа каждого участника завораживает, вдохновляет своей индивидуальностью и стилем🥺 Предлагаю вам ознакомиться с работами участников! Организатор и палитра: @artistsiris 1 @alex_gorn_art 2 @KawaiiArtRoomJoin 3 @madisonjj 4 @formch_o 5 @berreza_a 6 @GA_ARTS 7 @su…
custom 53527680310533252702
Signed ᅠᅠ
спасибо всем кто подписался, так что держите кальмара в традишке обычно я не выкладываю ничего сделанного на бумаге, так как это выглядит очень плохо по сравнению с диджиталом. абсолютно не чувствую материалы, в то время как стилус для планшета уже будто бы продолжение руки
custom 535276803105332527016custom 53729706123209072667custom 51908307859884101646
Signed ᅠᅠ
я не хочу, чтобы данный пост звучал как нытье, но тем не менее возможно он будет относиться именно к нему отписок все больше, а подписок ноль, и мне как и любому другому художнику важен отклик. спасибо каждому человеку за реакции и комментарии, но тем не менее я хочу развиваться дальше, а не стоять на одном месте и уходить вниз. смотря на статистку канала у меня, честно говоря, опускаются руки и желания постить и чт…
custom 533006235143559730118custom 535276803105332527011custom 51908307859884101648
Signed ᅠᅠ
акли тема: творческая душа творчество живет в каждом из нас, кто то выражает его в музыку, кто то в рисовании картин, кто то в создание скульптур, а кто то в убийства в утеху своему садизму #психология_души_ивент
custom 537297061232090726617custom 519083078598841016413custom 535276803105332527013custom 53300623514355973012
Signed ᅠᅠ
🌟новый арт и лор🌟 ✝она взяла в руки крест и повторила фразу, которую знала уже наизусть: – не губи свое здоровье, ведь оно является Божьим даром. сознательно выбирая курение, ты самостоятельно сокращаешь свою жизнь, поддаваясь самым греховным своим желаниям. он сделал паузу, однако в следующую минуту дым заполнил воздух между ними. Хьюго слышал подобное уже бесчисленное количество раз – и все разы ни от кого иного, …
custom 533006235143559730115custom 53729706123209072668custom 51908307859884101646
Signed ᅠᅠ
🎵важным также будет уточнить, что прототипы внешности каждого родителя были созданы ещё пару лет назад в онлайн-мейкере ассистенткой Никой. они ни в коем случае не претендуют на роль творческой работы художницы Frank и предоставлены лишь в качестве примерного образа для облегченной визуализации!
custom 53527680310533252709custom 53300623514355973012
Signed ᅠᅠ
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @frankkk779. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 231,613 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@frankkk779 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“frank” (@frankkk779), 182 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/frankkk779.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.