Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

cappy

@cappycoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003762227832
TypeChannel
Username@cappycoo
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cappycoo

Growth

1526 August 2026 — 152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:30152no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:47152first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
196.1%
avg views ÷ 152 subscribers
Avg views / post
298
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held13 (11 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,980
Reactions total370
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
82
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

507 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547011768302018207414628.8%
custom 52764407971415630179318.3%
custom 51972475229632083207214.2%
custom 52761775500060577166512.8%
custom 5278291180721831032499.66%
custom 5431506764547763623458.88%
custom 5449599541915431785265.13%
custom 5431347167858013611112.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cappycoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC41 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пол страны бухает, а Волочкова с бокалом дорого просека со свежей клубникой - алкоголик #спойлер

custom 519724752296320832014custom 54315067645477636238custom 54313471678580136114custom 52764407971415630171

5 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC77 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя девочка☺️ Наконец-то дошли руки отрисовать ей полностью аутфит Я балдею с того, какой милой она получилась #спойлер

custom 547011768302018207420custom 543150676454776362310custom 52782911807218310326custom 52761775500060577162

1 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC144 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Русалочка 🧜🏻‍♀️ Пока я была на отдыхе мы каждое утро смотрели h2o и после этого у меня огромное желание рисовать русалок🐰 #спойлер

custom 547011768302018207421custom 527644079714156301715custom 52782911807218310329custom 52761775500060577163custom 51972475229632083201

30 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC333 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А у меня сегодня пробила первая сотня🥹🥹 возможно цифра небольшая, но для меня это уже много значит. Дальше будем стремиться только к большему. Всех новоприбывших приветствую, надеюсь что вы останетесь со мной на подольше. Скоро здесь будет действительно много интересного, надеюсь, что вам у меня понравится😘

custom 547011768302018207435custom 527644079714156301712custom 52761775500060577169custom 54315067645477636234custom 51972475229632083201

29 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC517 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Погнали еще один реквест. На этот раз для @mono_despair Мне так нравится рисовать реквесты, у вас всех такие классные персонажи блинб🥰

custom 519724752296320832027custom 54701176830201820749custom 52764407971415630175custom 54315067645477636235

28 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC367 views49 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работа на летнюю палитру от @petuulox и @NattaHeartt Буду рада вашим реакциям, потому что в трясущемся поезде рисовать было очень тяжело🥹🥹

custom 544959954191543178526custom 547011768302018207413custom 52764407971415630178custom 54315067645477636232

27 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC319 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всю неделю я была на морюшке и по максимуму отдыхала. И ничего толком не рисовала. А перед вами на фото образ диснеевской принцессы у которой очень сильно обгорели руки

custom 547011768302018207414custom 51972475229632083205custom 52782911807218310325

27 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC257 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Соскучились по мне? 🤩

custom 519724752296320832010custom 54701176830201820747

18 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC284 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @NattaHearttPhoto

🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 ↪️🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 ➰Подписка на организатора @NattaHeartt ➰Репост в свой тгк/3 пиар чата + пруфы в комменты. ➰Анкета с работами и указанием Вашего тгк и ЛС. 🤩🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤩 ➰Вы должны нарисовать полноценный арт с Вашим персонажем, если бы он был ИНОПЛАНЕТЯНИНОМ ЗИП ЗИП ЗИП. ➰Срисовки, обводки, ии, выдача своей старой работы за новую - запрещаются!! Конец набора: 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 Дедлайн: 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠

custom 54701176830201820748custom 54315067645477636235custom 51972475229632083203

15 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC641 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Красивый мальчишка для @KetKAT0

custom 527617755000605771618custom 543150676454776362311custom 51972475229632083209custom 54313471678580136115

14 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC488 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#portfolioday Буду рада реакциям и репостам☺️☺️ Буду всех взаимно репостить☺️☺️

custom 527829118072183103222custom 527617755000605771614custom 527644079714156301712custom 51972475229632083202custom 54313471678580136112

12 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC218 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Резкое желание посмотреть уцц обернулось тем что теперь я хочу нарисовать оттуда почти всех персонажиков😺 #спойлер

custom 527644079714156301720custom 527617755000605771611custom 54701176830201820749custom 52782911807218310324

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cappycoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 221,867 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“cappy” (@cappycoo), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cappycoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.