Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,609–13,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:21
13,674
-17
15 Sept 2026, 21:59
13,691
+36
14 Sept 2026, 06:02
13,655
-12
12 Sept 2026, 14:37
13,667
+40
10 Sept 2026, 14:40
13,627
-21
7 Sept 2026, 12:42
13,648
-23
4 Sept 2026, 18:20
13,671
+23
3 Sept 2026, 05:58
13,648
-3
2 Sept 2026, 01:25
13,651
-15
1 Sept 2026, 03:44
13,666
-9
31 Aug 2026, 02:48
13,675
-8
30 Aug 2026, 01:56
13,683
-11
29 Aug 2026, 05:24
13,694
+14
28 Aug 2026, 04:56
13,680
-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:26
13,681
-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:37
13,682
+5
25 Aug 2026, 05:47
13,677
+3
24 Aug 2026, 07:25
13,674
-9
22 Aug 2026, 14:18
13,683
+3
21 Aug 2026, 07:36
13,680
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.57%
avg views ÷ 13,674 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
22 (12 September 2025 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
78
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 03s
Average length
2m 01s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
255 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
120
47.1%
🏆
26
10.2%
👍
19
7.45%
🙏
19
7.45%
❤🔥
17
6.67%
🕊
12
4.71%
💋
11
4.31%
👏
6
2.35%
💯
6
2.35%
💘
5
1.96%
😍
5
1.96%
⚡
2
0.784%
🔥
2
0.784%
🤝
2
0.784%
🙉
1
0.392%
🥰
1
0.392%
🦄
1
0.392%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
والدین با اهداف مختلف دست به درد و دل با فرزند می زنند؛
گاه آگاهانه و گاه بصورت نا آگاه!
برخی این کار را برای مثلث سازی با کودک و داشتن حمایت وی در مقابل همسر انجام می دهند؛
و برخی دیگر برای دادن حس گناه به فرزند به جهت مظلوم نمایی و تبرئه کردن خود در مقابل کوتاهیشان؛
و گاهی نیز با دادن چنین دردی به فرزند، انتقام دردی را می گیرند که خود با انتخاب اشتباهشان با آوردن فرزند به این دنیا متحمل شده اند!
فرقی نمی کند که…
.. 𓂃𝚿𓂃..
『سلامت روان چیست؟ | فراتر از نبود بیماری』
Mental Health | Beyond the Absence of Disorder
▣ 『تعریف علمی』
✍ سلامت روان صرفاً نبود اختلال نیست؛ بلکه وضعیتی از بهزیستی است که فرد میتواند با استرسهای روزمره مقابله کند، کارآمد باشد و در جامعه نقش داشته باشد.
(بر اساس World Health Organization, 2022)
Mental health is a state of well being, not just absence of illness.
● مؤلفههای اصلی:
• تنظیم هیجانی
• انعطا…
تشریح و تکمیل این پست :
💌 https://t.me/PhilosophersPsychologicalSociety/838 🧩
اسناد غرق شدن در افکار، به شرایط بدن از سمت دوست و همکار عزیزم، کمی گمراه کننده است؛
مسئله در اینجا الزاما بدن نیست،
مقصود محیط و شرایط است؛
اگر دنیای جسم شما امن نباشد، شما به دنیای خیالات و اوماهات و فرار از واقعیت پناه می برید؛
اساسا هر #مکانسیم_دفاعی ای ( دیدگاه #روانکاوی ) و هر #خطای_شناختی ای (دیدگاه #روانشناسی_شناختی ) خود، نوعی …
🏛 برترین کانال روانشناسی آپارات (دوره های آموزشی حتی با نت ملی ) :
👑 https://www.aparat.com/MOHAMMAD_JAVAD_BAGHSHANY 🥇
📚 پلی لیست طرحواره درمانی :
🔱 https://www.aparat.com/playlist/20946599 ⚜
❌ توی این وضعیت که همه چیز متوقف شده، تو به فکر رشد و یادگیری باش.
✅ این دوره هم برای عموم مناسب هست و هم متخصصین.
🎥 آرشیو جامع سایکو سینما ( تحلیل فیلم ) :
🎞 https://www.aparat.com/playlist/22847104 🍟
🎬 در کنار فیلم دیدن و …
╔ 𝚿 ══
•• ادامه مطلبِ تنظیم عصبی از مسیر فک: مداخلهٔ سوماتیک مبتنی بر پلیوِگال و کارهای پیتر لوین 』
➕ اثرات روانتنی مورد انتظار
〽️ پژوهشهای #پلیوگال و #سوماتیک نشان میدهند این نوع رهاسازی میتواند:
🔹 کاهش برانگیختگی اضطرابی
🔹 کاهش ضربان قلب
🔹 کاهش فشار فک، شقیقه و گردن
🔹 افزایش تمرکز و آرامسازی ذهن
🔹 بهبود کیفیت خواب
• انتقال بدن از حالتهای «جنگ/گریز» یا «انجماد» به حالت سوم:
حالت اتصال، امنیت و حضور.
به …
╔ 𝚿 ══
『 تنظیم عصبی از مسیر فک: مداخلهٔ سوماتیک مبتنی بر پلیوِگال و کارهای پیتر لوین 』
•┅━ 𝚿 ━┅٠࿐
✍ فک از نخستین نواحیای است که بدن تنش اضطراب را در آن ذخیره میکند.
فعالسازی بیش از حد سیستم #سمپاتیک، تون پایهای عضلات اوروفاشیال از جمله فک، شقیقه و عضلات جویدن را افزایش میدهد.
این الگوی افزایش تون در مطالعات EMG بهعنوان یکی از نشانگرهای پایدار اضطراب شناخته شده است.
❍ دکتر #پیتر_لوین، "بنیانگذار Somatic Ex…
🎭 دوره ی جامع طرحواره درمانی + تطبیق با دیگر رویکرد ها 🎯
♨️ به ارزش ۲۵۰ دلار 💲
💯 رایگان به مدت محدود فقط از لینک های زیر
📜 با امکان دریافت گواهی بین المللی معتبر 🔥
🎓 با تدریس ویژه ی #محمد_جواد_باغشینی
⬇️⏬⬇️🏆⬇️⏬⬇️
🎧🎞 فهرست جلسات 🎬 :
💎 لیست ۱ ، جلسه ی ۱ تا ۱۰ 👇
✅ https://t.me/c/1122832260/151 ✔️
💎 لیست ۲ ، جلسه ی ۱۱ تا ۲۰ 👇
✅ https://t.me/c/1122832260/161 ✔️
💎 لیست ۳ ، جلسه ی ۲۱ تا ۳۰ 👇
✅ https://t.me/c/112283…
『 تبدیل درد به رنج 』
✍ آنچه که سختی و درد را به رنج تبدیل میکند، عدم پذیرش درد است.
احساس غم پس از یک درد است که به رنج ختم میشود.
ترس، احساس حقارت و شرم پس از یک تجربه آزار جنسی است که منجر به رنج میشود.
زندگی متاسفانه این وقایع را ایجاد میکند و واکنش به چنین رویدادهایی با ناراحتی و ترس کاملآ بهنجار است.
مشکل زمانی به وجود میآید که حاضر به پذیرش واکنشهای هیجانی خودمان به مشکلات و دردها نیستیم.
₪ اینجاست ک…
『 شکاف روان: وقتی خودِ آرمانی علیه تو شورش میکند. | نظریه کارل راجرز | 』
✍ در نظریهٔ #کارل_راجرز، ما دو «خود» داریم:
1️⃣ خودِ واقعی
آنچه هستی: توانها، ضعفها، تاریخ زندگیات
2️⃣ خودِ آرمانی
آنچه باید باشی: کامل، موفق، بینقص… اغلب ساختهی نگاه دیگران
وقتی این دو تصویر اختلاف فاحش پیدا میکنند:
〽️ نتیجه؟ اضطراب، شرم، خودسرزنشی و فرار از خود
📌 پژوهشها تأیید کردهاند:
هرچه فاصلهٔ این دو بیشتر، #سلامت_روان پایی…
╔ 𝚿 ══
•• ادامه مطلب چرا ذهن ما عاشقِ دروغهای خوشاینده است؟ | روانشناسیِ خودفریبی 🎭 』
➕ نشانه های خودفریبی در زندگی واقعی
اگر سه مورد از پنج مورد زیر را در خودت دیدی، احتمالاً ذهنت درگیر خودفریبی است:👇
𝟏. بارها بازخورد معتبر (داده، نتایج، نظر متخصص یا دیگران) میگیری، اما آن را تحریف یا توجیه میکنی.
𝟐. هر نقدی را حمل بر خصومت میکنی؛ انگار دیگران دشمن رشد تو هستند.
𝟑. بعد از هر تصمیم اشتباه، دلیلتراشی پسینی…
『 چرا ذهن ما عاشقِ دروغهای خوشاینده است؟ | روانشناسیِ خودفریبی 🎭 』
•┅━ 𝚿 ━┅٠࿐
✍ ما انسانها حقیقت را دوست داریم، تا وقتی با ما مهربان باشد.
اما بهمحض اینکه واقعیت، غرور یا امنیتمان را تهدید کند، ذهن دست به یک بازی زیرکانه میزند: «تحریف واقعیت برای حفظ تعادل روانی».
به این بازی، در علم روانشناسی #خودفریبی (Self-deception) میگویند.
➕ ماهیت خودفریبی
خودفریبی یعنی باور کردن چیزی که میدانیم – یا باید بدانیم – در…
❤5💯1
Signed 𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐅𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @IranaPsychologicalAssociation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@IranaPsychologicalAssociation named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@majideshraghlawyer named in 13 posts, 8 August 2026 – 31 August 2026
@mohammadjavadbaghshaniy named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دیالکتیک علمی @ScientificDialectics · 24,277 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @ravanketabb · 23,041 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
کتابهای روانشناسی و روانپزشکی @psyologistravanbook · 22,119 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“انجمن روانشناسی ایرانا (I.P.A) | Irana Psychological Association (IPA)” (@IranaPsychologicalAssociation), 13,674 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/IranaPsychologicalAssociation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.