Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⁉️💉Individuelle_Impfentscheidung_💉⁉️

Channel

⁉️💉Individuelle_Impfentscheidung_💉⁉️

@Individuelle_Impfentscheidung

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

905subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001450445644
TypeChannel
Username@Individuelle_Impfentscheidung
Created25 July 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Individuelle_Impfentscheidung

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

902907904.56 August 2026 — 907 subscribers7 August 2026 — 906 subscribers16 August 2026 — 904 subscribers22 August 2026 — 902 subscribers30 August 2026 — 903 subscribers8 September 2026 — 904 subscribers16 September 2026 — 905 subscribers9056 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 901–908 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 16:41905+1
8 Sept 2026, 09:38904+1
30 Aug 2026, 01:34903+1
22 Aug 2026, 15:42902-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:38904-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:35906-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:03907first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍360.0%
240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 02:42 UTC84 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaHermanOffiziellVideo

. In den USA kommt die Covid-Lüge jetzt prominent ans Licht. In den deutschsprachigen Haltungsmedien lesen wir herzlich wenig darüber... ‼️👉 „Anthony Fauci hielt buchstäblich in seinem Tagebuch fest, dass die Sterblichkeitsrate bei Covid nur 0,2 % betrug. Anthony Fauci wird damit konfrontiert, dass er in seinem Tagebuch notierte, Covid-19 sei im Grunde nur eine Grippe gewesen – er sich dann aber für Lockdowns im

13 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC168 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Klartext2021Gemeinsam

Wer einen Impfschaden erlitten hat, sollte seine Chargennummer überprüfen. Der deutsche Rechtsanwalt Tobias Ulbrich, der unzählige Impfgeschädigte vertritt, sieht sich in seiner Praxis bestätigt, dass die größten Schäden durch eine begrenzte Anzahl von Chargen verursacht werden. Aus seinen Daten hat er eine Liste der gefährlichsten Chargennummern zusammengestellt. Dabei handelt es sich um die Impfstoffe Pfizer und

13 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RA_Ludwig

💥 Erster Erfolg der Enquete 💥 Am 26. Juni haben wir als Sachverständige in der Brandenburger Enquete-Kommission zu Corona ein Ende der Impfempfehlung für die modRNA-Covid-Impfung gefordert. Heute hat die Ständige Impfkommission die Empfehlung für alle Menschen unter 75 Jahre aufgehoben. Quelle Das ist ein erster Erfolg. Zwar ist die Begründung dafür, dass es ja jetzt eine Grundimmunisierung gäbe, tatsächlich weiß

👍3

6 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC192 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @freiheitskanzleiPhoto

Die Staatsanwaltschaft Amberg belegt ungewollt: bis zu 1.800 Prozent erhöhtes Risiko durch die Masern-Impfung. Ausgerechnet ein von der Staatsanwaltschaft beauftragter Gutachter, Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Jilg von der Universität Regensburg, bestätigt den Kern unserer Argumentation eindrucksvoll. Das ist ein massives Eigentor der Staatsanwaltschaft — und ein riesiger Erfolg für den Masern-Impfblocker der Freiheitskan

22 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC174 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @P_McCulloughMDVideo

@SenRonJohnsonUS: There is a total Media Blackout on the new COVID Vax Child Death count study: 24% of 39,000 Victims Died the Same Day or Within 48 Hours @P_McCulloughMD

22 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC218 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eltern_stehen_aufPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

22 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eltern_stehen_auf

Wo sind deine Quellen?!? 🤬 Studie zur Kindersterblichkeit nach Impfung? Der o.g. Beitrag geht gerade rum bzw wird immer wieder als Quelle verlinkt. Im Kern haben wir Senator Ron Johnson der behauptet weltweit gab es 39.000 Kinder, die nach der Covid-Impfung mit Komplikationen gemeldet wurden. Von den Todesfällen starben 24% innerhalb 24h nach der Impfung. Eine Quelle hab ich in dem Videoschnippsel jetzt nicht gefun

1

22 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC246 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @eltern_stehen_auf

Quelle?!? Jaroslav Belsky erklärt, wie man Quellen im Laufe der Geschichte zurechtbiegt, damit sie das richtige Narrativ erzählen. Das Video vervollständigt diesen Beitrag. https://youtu.be/HAwlih7ZtBM 21.JUNI 2026 ❤️ www.elternstehenauf.de🌹

12 Jun 2026, 09:26 UTC215 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dawidsnowden

https://youtu.be/yCJ83QhCoP8?is=6yKG_m9EmPz0_qyW

9 Jun 2026, 17:22 UTC217 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @rechtsanwaeltin_beate_bahnerPhoto

HAMMERMELDUNG Wolfgang Wodarg auf X: Weshalb ist bei gleicher Spritzenzahl die Übersterblichkeit in Deutschland sehr hoch und beim neuen NATO-Mitglied Schweden gleich null? Die Spritzen-Pandemie war ein gezieltes und international verabredetes gentechnischen Massenexperiment mit Hilfe des Militärs. Was wir von Anfang an gesehen und vermutet haben, wurde jetzt durch ein interdisziplinäres Team in den USA bestätigt

6 Jun 2026, 19:21 UTC184 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gesundistbesserVideo

@michaelleitner FEHLDIAGNOSE SCHÜTTELTRAUMA? IMPFSCHÄDEN SYSTEMATISCH VERTUSCHT! (360p) Dokumentarfilm FEHLDIAGNOSE SCHÜTTELTRAUMA? IMPFSCHÄDEN SYSTEMATISCH VERTUSCHT! Eltern wird vorgeworfen, ihr Kinder so heftig geschüttelt zu haben, das lebensbedrohliche Verletzungen u.a. am Gehirn auftreten. Ärzte, Jugendämter und Gerichte nehmen Eltern ihre teils erst 10-12 Wochen alten Kinder in gutem Glauben weg, die Kinder s

3 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC189 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tkp_news

Während die Menschen im Kongo nicht bei der Ebola-Gesundheitskrise mitspielen, wird fleißig am Impfexperiment gearbeitet. In wenigen Monaten dürfte der neue Moderna-Ebola-Impfstoff bereit sein. Beitrag hier lesen👇 https://tkp.at/2026/06/02/millionen-fuer-modernas-ebola-impfstoff/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Individuelle_Impfentscheidung. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⁉️💉Individuelle_Impfentscheidung_💉⁉️” (@Individuelle_Impfentscheidung), 905 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Individuelle_Impfentscheidung.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.