Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IT HR ХАБ

Channel

IT HR ХАБ

@ITHRhub

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

181subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002291770613
TypeChannel
Username@ITHRhub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ITHRhub

Topic

Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ithrconf/21063 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC@ITHRhub/405 · this entry3 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@ITHRhub/407 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC@ithrconf/212228 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC1.004 days
@ithrconf/212331 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC@ITHRhub/409 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC1.004 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ithrconf5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.6 hours@ithrconf (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ithrconf. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

170181175.57 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers14 August 2026 — 173 subscribers22 August 2026 — 172 subscribers29 August 2026 — 171 subscribers5 September 2026 — 172 subscribers13 September 2026 — 174 subscribers27 September 2026 — 175 subscribers15 October 2026 — 177 subscribers22 October 2026 — 178 subscribers29 October 2026 — 179 subscribers5 November 2026 — 180 subscribers14 November 2026 — 181 subscribers7 August 202614 November 2026
13 measurements spanning 98 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 168–183 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 01:59181+1
5 Nov 2026, 01:08180+1
29 Oct 2026, 21:50179+1
22 Oct 2026, 17:29178+1
15 Oct 2026, 17:16177+2
27 Sept 2026, 05:58175+1
13 Sept 2026, 08:57174+2
5 Sept 2026, 23:40172+1
29 Aug 2026, 06:35171-1
22 Aug 2026, 04:17172-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:08173+3
8 Aug 2026, 15:15170no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:48170first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1636.4%
🤩920.5%
🔥613.6%
👍511.4%
❤‍🔥36.82%
💘24.55%
✍12.27%
🍾12.27%
🎉12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC135 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SPB HR BREAKFAST #5 by T HR COMMUNITY HR ЗНАНИЯ БЕЗ ИНФОШУМА: ЧЕМУ УЧИТЬСЯ, КОМУ ДОВЕРЯТЬ И КУДА ЕЗДИТЬ? Сегодня информации для HR стало слишком много. Телеграм-каналы, статьи, подкасты, исследования, вебинары, конференции, курсы, блоги, LinkedIn, YouTube… Кажется, что возможностей для развития больше, чем когда-либо. Но вместе с этим растёт и информационный шум. Как среди всего этого потока находить действительно…

3 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC225 viewsread 8 August 2026

Коллеги, привет ) 🍂 Готовимся к очередному сезону наших замечательных митапов и завтраков! Сейчас мы ищем компании, готовые принять мероприятия на своей площадке в Санкт-Петербурге, Москве, Нижнем Новгороде, Екатеринбурге, Омске, Ижевске и Тбилиси. Для IT HR MEETUP понадобится конференц-зал на 30–40 человек, экран или проектор, стабильный интернет для трансляции, небольшой кофе-брейк с "вкусняшками", профессиональ…

31 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC220 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥐 Проведите IT HR BREAKFAST в вашей компании! Коллеги, привет! Буквально вчера мы провели очередной IT HR BREAKFAST и на этот раз в офисе Газпром ЦПС и видим, что такой формат очень понравился участникам. Получилось тепло, уютно и очень полезно: небольшая группа коллег, живое общение без сцены и микрофонов, обмен опытом и возможность спокойно обсудить профессиональные вопросы. Хотим продолжить проводить такие встр…

❤5

24 Jul 2026, 11:24 UTC355 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

SPB HR BREAKFAST #4 by Газпром ЦПС ОЦЕНКА КОМПЕТЕНЦИЙ: ХАРДЫ И СОФТЫ Команда «Газпром ЦПС» приглашает вас на профессиональный завтрак, посвящённый теме оценки компетенций. Сегодня для многих компаний ключевой фокус — не поиск и адаптация новых сотрудников, а развитие и усиление компетенций уже работающей команды. Именно поэтому всё большее значение приобретают матрицы компетенций, а также оценка hard и soft skills…

❤1

7 Jul 2026, 12:44 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ithrpodcastPhoto

🎙 ОДИН СПЕЦИАЛИСТ, ТРИ НАЧАЛЬНИКА - КАК СТРОИТЬ РАЗВИТИЕ В АУТСТАФФЕ ➿ 85-й выпуск IT HR подкаста by HR API ➿ Как развивать людей, которые формально работают не на тебя. В аутстаффе у L&D сразу три заказчика: клиент, компания и сам сотрудник. Клиенту нужно, чтобы задачи решались, сотрудник хочет расти, компания хочет и то, и другое, и желательно бесплатно. Поди угоди всем. Поговорили о том, как это работает на пра…

💘2🔥2

3 Jul 2026, 09:53 UTC409 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Даже на рынке работодателя компании продолжают вкладываться в HR-бренд Хабр Карьера проводит опрос среди тех, кто отвечает за репутацию компании как работодателя, чтобы выяснить: - к каким бизнес-метрикам привязывают HR-бренд в российских компаниях (и привязывают ли вообще) - какие инструменты работают в 2026 году - как измеряется эффективность брендинговых активностей Бонус за участие — записи с Хабрасеминара, гд…

1 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ithrpodcastPhoto

🎙 HR ЛИДЕР И КОРП. КУЛЬТУРА. КАК МЫ ВЛИЯЕМ? ➿ 84-й выпуск IT HR подкаста by HR API ➿ Не каждую культуру можно изменить, и не под каждую стоит подстраиваться. Говорим о профессиональной зрелости HR лидера, культурном совпадении и о том, как принимать решения, когда ценности компании начинают расходиться с твоими собственными. ➿ Фаина Лернер / IT-HR-эксперт Олеся Ежова / Human Capital Director Катя Иванова / Search&Hi…

❤1

23 Jun 2026, 08:16 UTC417 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интересный кейс на стыке найма и HR-бренда: специально для Авито команда getmatch запустила спецпроект — тестирование IT-специалистов по 7 направлениям, от Data Science до QA. Внутри теста — прозрачная матрица грейдов от Авито и персональная AI-обратная связь каждому участнику. Основная идея в том, чтобы дать возможность кандидату честно оценить свой уровень и полностью снять рутинный этап оценки с рекрутеров. В р…

👍2✍1

17 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC435 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♥️ HR API 2026 — конференция для тех, кто работает с людьми в IT 19–20 июня в Санкт-Петербурге и онлайн соберутся HRD, HR BP, рекрутеры, сорсеры, L&D, DevRel, специалисты по коммуникациям и руководители команд. В программе – 39 докладов, 7 мастер-классов и Фестиваль HR-фейлов: от AI, HR Tech и рекрутинга до DevRel, HR-бренда, обучения, C&B, онбординга, удержания, коммуникаций и управленческих решений. Своим опы…

🤩4🍾1🎉1

11 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC77 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ithrconfPhoto

Стань частью команды HR API 2026 ❤️ (нам нужно еще 2 человека!) Хочешь в самую движуху конференции? Познакомиться с крутыми людьми, сделать конференцию запоминающейся и провести три дня на энергии? Присоединяйся! HR API ищет волонтеров, которые помогут собирать пакеты участников, встречать гостей, поддерживать модераторов в залах и делать конференцию уютной для всех. В ответ — забота и благодарность: 🍏 Обеды, ко…

🤩2

10 Jun 2026, 15:13 UTC341 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня митапим: https://ithrhub.com/events/ithrmeetup_94/

❤4👍1🤩1

9 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ithrconfPhoto

🌐 Кто уже едет на HR API 2026? HR API - это не только программа. Это люди, которые каждый день меняют IT HR, рекрутинг, DevRel, обучение, HR Tech и работу с командами. В этом году на конференции встретятся представители ведущих компаний рынка: • Яндекс • VK • Ozon • Kaspersky • Т-Банк • Авито • Selectel • Positive Technologies • 2ГИС • hh.ru • Контур • BI.ZONE • и многие другие 39 докладов, 7 мастер-классов, фес…

🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ITHRhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IT HR ХАБ” (@ITHRhub), 181 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ITHRhub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.