Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
21 measurements spanning 31 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,293–12,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 20:56
12,384
-14
16 Sept 2026, 14:21
12,398
+6
14 Sept 2026, 19:37
12,392
+5
13 Sept 2026, 04:36
12,387
+15
8 Sept 2026, 11:38
12,372
+4
5 Sept 2026, 05:37
12,368
+10
3 Sept 2026, 12:19
12,358
+8
2 Sept 2026, 08:43
12,350
+1
1 Sept 2026, 09:54
12,349
+15
31 Aug 2026, 08:34
12,334
+16
30 Aug 2026, 06:56
12,318
+3
29 Aug 2026, 06:27
12,315
-1
28 Aug 2026, 05:13
12,316
-1
27 Aug 2026, 06:14
12,317
+4
25 Aug 2026, 05:48
12,313
+6
24 Aug 2026, 07:09
12,307
-9
22 Aug 2026, 13:37
12,316
-7
21 Aug 2026, 01:52
12,323
-6
19 Aug 2026, 23:02
12,329
-4
19 Aug 2026, 07:15
12,333
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3,237 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,364
73.0%
👍
288
8.90%
🔥
98
3.03%
🙏
85
2.63%
👏
70
2.16%
🎉
66
2.04%
🥰
46
1.42%
🫡
45
1.39%
🍌
37
1.14%
😭
25
0.772%
🖕
17
0.525%
👎
16
0.494%
💩
15
0.463%
❤🔥
14
0.432%
🆒
13
0.402%
💯
13
0.402%
💋
8
0.247%
😢
6
0.185%
🌭
3
0.093%
🤮
3
0.093%
4 further kinds
5
0.154%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2024 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To all the aspirants who were asking whether civil services is worth the try?
I would just let you see these pictures, look at the hope that people carry, that you, through your small actions can bring some positive change in their life, that you will listen to their problems even if not all can be solved. If you want to be there on field, listen to public, their issues, their genuine criticism, this service offers h…
Looking at the queries listed in your messages
1. You need guidance on sources I followed for my mains
2. mains test series
3. How to self evaluate mains answers
4. How to prepare notes for mains
Optional
1. sources for paper 1 and paper 2
2. Answer writing strategy
3. Notes making
Will try and answer this one by one on my main channel.
Thank you.
Take care.
Study well.
Hello fellow aspirants
Have been getting queries regarding mains and prelims help..
With all due humility and respect, may I please know what kind of help do you need?
P.S: Serious candidate ensure comments to be productive.
Thank you
As 14 days remain for the upcoming Prelims, You can please go through this.
Times are tough, both at the borders and for you as aspirants.
Stay Strong.
All the very best.
Apart from these i would share summary of some economics books.
This was prepared by my dear friend Gaurav. He is in forest Service now.
This will also help add value to your economics answers.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @priyarani_ias. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ONLY IAS NOTES 2026 @only_ias_notes_2026 · 53,761 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
UPSC FACTS Hindi @upsc_facts_hindi · 32,679 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 September 2026
Shubham Kumar: Strategy and Notes for UPSC(CSE) @shubhamkr_ias · 90,686 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
IASbaba (Official) Telegram Channel @IASbabaOfficialAccount · 76,479 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Priya Rani AIR 69” (@priyarani_ias), 12,384 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/priyarani_ias.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
