2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 18:03
3
no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:17
3
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 22 April 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Links
2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Happy birthday United States of America!
香港國喺香港向各位美國人問好！
我非常慶幸香港人仲可以有機會同美國慶祝國慶，武漢肺炎持續全球肆虐，對於美國不能如往年一樣都有國慶節遊行、去沙灘慶祝、街外搶睇煙火最佳位置感到非常遺憾。
每年嘅7月4號，美國人同親朋好友歡聚一堂，弘揚二百幾年前激勵美國人先輩建國嘅價值理念，例如包括：生命、自由同對幸福嘅追求(All men are created equal)呢啲自由並非美國人所特有。
佢哋嘅價值理念仲體現咗喺好多國家嘅憲法之中，並且寫入得到我哋所有人都承認嘅《世界人權宣言》中。因此，今日美國獨立日(U.S. Independence Day)亦都係我哋全人類、我哋香港人值得共同慶祝嘅慶典。
但係今天亦都係美國一個特殊嘅日子，我香港國對於我哋仲能夠一齊紀念呢個日子感到高興，因為各地嘅美國人，特別係幫助我哋香港嘅外交使團、美國嘅外交人員同埋數之…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @HongKongStateCongress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,276,590 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@HongKongStateCongress named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hongkongstatefco named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
@starfleetofhks named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏛香港國國會” (@HongKongStateCongress), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HongKongStateCongress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
